0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What does it take to get someone on this forum to admit something notable has been written??
I'm not letting this thread die until someone challenges me on it.
you all already knew this info about the double slit?
But you can.If the particles you are shooting have an electric charge (eg electrons, protons or ions), you can put a coil around one slit (or both slits), and it will register a pulse if and when a charged particle passes through that slit.
That didn't further the conversation. I described something that has never been written about the double slit and you assume it's wrong because I'm the one that wrote it.
pretend someone you respect wrote it.
I was wrong about coherence in water ..I must be wrong about everything then.
shoot me for being curious. Delete the water thread if it bothers you that much. It's interesting that you were willing to do the experiment though ..meaning you thought there might be something going on to.
No one has challenged anything in this thread because they can't prove it wrong.
I think phase creates the path/channel for the invisible particle in superposition to follow during the double slit experiment.
Which way information not being the cause ..is a big deal
So I got you to read only the first post?
I was hoping it would trick you into reading the rest of the posts to understand it.