The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
LCS concept instead of SR
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
LCS concept instead of SR
1 Replies
700 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
xersanozgen
(OP)
Sr. Member
261
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
LCS concept instead of SR
«
on:
07/06/2017 12:19:53 »
LCS concept instead of SR
How was the LCS concept generated?
We had wanted to analyze the motion of two photons -
that they were emitted at the same moment but opposite directions
- according to their source and by SR mentality (Please examine the figure at attachment):
Lorentz transformations (Coordinates of a photon according to new position of its source):
x’ = (c – v) t / (1 – v²/c²)½
t’ = (1 – v/c) / (1 – v²/c²)½
Confirmation : x’/ t’ = c
If we consider reverse option : The photon travels toward + x while the source goes to - x (use the parameter v by negative mark); or the photon at the direction - x, source at + x (use the parameter c by negative mark).
x’’ = (- c - v) t / (1 – v²/c²)½
t’’ = (1 + v/c) / (1 – v²/c²)½
Confirmation: x’’/ t’’ = - c
Well. We find the coordinates of the photons (that travel toward +x and –x directions) while their source (that has uniform motion) goes toward +x. And we provided confirmations of these calculations:
x / t = x’ / t’ = Ι x’’ / t’’ I = c
Already the aim of theory SR and Lorentz was this result: The relative velocities of light are same and fixed value according to any moving body that has uniform motion.
Yes, these results are mathematical successful performance of Lorentz and SR.
However this calculation indicates that; t’’ > t’
The source’s or moving body’s clock/chronometer has to show two number of time simultaneously for providing the fixed value of light’s velocity.
But this result is impossible.
Earlier example was on the Earth; the source was in a train/rocket and its speed (v) is relative value according to rails/world. The times t, t’, t’’ represent a single/same moment in accordance with entity of photon. In this experiment train’s clock had to show two or three different numbers of time, simultaneously.
If we prefer an outer and sequential reference frame (solar system or the Sun). The orbital motion of the Earth can be supposed a uniform motion for small distances. And resultant speed of train will be the value V(earth) +/- v. On this experiment, train’s clock is obliged to show 5 or 6 different numbers of time, simultaneously.
..........
We can go on by other sequential reference frames. All relative values of light’s velocity are fixed value c (according to each one of all sequential reference frames). But, the source’s relative speed will get different values.
At last, we will arrive / consider the most external reference frame (space)
*
.
Why did NOT we consider this major reference frame at the beginning? Is it anthropocentric attitude or captivity of locality?
* Here is alternative/new theory for light kinematics: the concept of LCS (Light coordinate system)
«
Last Edit: 20/06/2017 15:21:01 by
xersanozgen
»
Logged
Are you a naked scientist or a romantic scientist?
xersanozgen
(OP)
Sr. Member
261
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Re: LCS concept instead of SR
«
Reply #1 on:
08/06/2017 13:49:59 »
Briefly, if we consider most external reference frame (that is just the space or LCS),
we can analyze space time
(Asknown, the theory SR does not allow to analyze space-time because of async data).
The relative velocity of light is already the value c again according to space.
Of course, the values of other actors' speeds must be adapted according to space.
And It must be considered that the top limit of increasing/decreasing speed for the distance between two moving bodies/actors is 2c.
The positions of actors are marked on the space; an actor cannot be used like a marking point. Naturally, the space has not markability; however we have a possibility to use a sheet of paper instead of space/LCS for analyzing.
So, we don't need like a theory SR; we can analyze space-time due to LCS concept. I realized *an analyzing example to calculate the age of universe (Result: 19.3 Gyrs). In this study, it is indicated that observational data are coincided with calculated data.
*
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhyEs..26...49E
«
Last Edit: 09/06/2017 08:58:22 by
xersanozgen
»
Logged
Are you a naked scientist or a romantic scientist?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...