0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Today i realized that V V/c c in the FitzGerald Lorentz equation for gamma for calculating length contraction & ticking dilation might be wrong. I have for a while realized that the electrostatic & electrodynamic attraction & repulsion in atoms & tween atoms & tween molecules is due to the action of photaenos not photons. Photons travel at c kmps in empty space or at a reduced value c' kmps in space that has photaenos in it. All of space has photaenos, hencely c (the maximum possible speed of propagation of a photon throo the aether) is never realized anywhere. In that there V V/c c it might well be that (1) c is the limiting value for the speed of a particle throo the aether, & (2) V might never reach c, & (3) V/c might never reach 1. But i think that (1)(2)(3) are suspect. I might come back to that later.But as i said this whole LC stuff & gamma stuff, being based on the action of photons, must now be seen as very suspect. It is due to the action of photaenos.Now, whether the c in V/c is the speed of propagation of a photon or the speed of propagation of a photaeno might make no difference to gamma & LC if those two speeds have the same value. But they dont have the same value. A photon is limited to c or c', & a photaeno is limited to say 5c or praps 5c' (as shown by Gasser). Photaenos make em radiation, photaenos are em radiation, & em radiation is photaenos. Photaenos are emitted by the central helical body of a photon, photaenos are a part of every photon.Electrons & quarks etc are confined photons, & confined photons emit photaenos in a similar way to free photons. Except that half of the photaenos from a confined photon are emitted inwards where they annihilate, leaving just the positive halves of the photaeno (or just the negative halves) being emitted, which results in what we call charge (Williamson). The positive halves & negative halves emitted by free photons cancel, giving zero nett charge (but not zero nett photaenos). Anyhow, all interactions are em interactions & all em interactions are due to photaenos (needs work).So i am thinking that gamma might need to be based on V/5c times V/5c. Or V/5c' times V/5c', based on photaenos (& photons) being slowed due to photaeno congestion (ie due to the presence of other photaenos). I suppose that the speed of a particle throo the aether is limited to 1c' not 5c'.Anyhow this makes gamma & LC & TD more complicated. Still thinking.
Why do you bother making up this nonsense?
If I remember right that is a very tricky question Mad. " how does EM radiation radiate." But it was some time ago, I'll check it up https://www.quora.com/How-do-things-radiate-electromagnetic-radiation?share=1I also seem to remember that you can discuss it in terms of near fields and far fields.
I'll get back to this one Mad, I just wish JP still was here. I think he was the one getting into how that worked.
Found this Mad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_fieldWhat you should do is to look into the talk side of it if you're interested in how people think about it.JP had a very good explanation as I remember, but I can't find it.