Colin leslie dean points out that Godel theorem is the biggest fraud in

mathematical history

everything dean has shown was known at the time godel did his proof but no

one meantioned any of it ie Godels theorem is invalid as it uses invalid

axioms ie axiom of reducibility

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/philosophy/GODEL5.pdflook

godel used the 2nd ed of PM he says

“A. Whitehead and B. Russell, Principia Mathematica, 2nd edition,

Cambridge 1925. In particular, we also reckon **among the axioms of PM**

the

axiom of infinity (in the form: there exist denumerably many individuals),

and the axioms of reducibility and of choice (for all

types)”

note he says he is going to use AR

but

Russell following wittgenstien took it out of the 2nd ed due to it being

invalid NOTE it was not in the 2nd ed which godel used

godel would have know that

russell and wittgenstien new godel used it but said nothing

ramsey points out AR is invalid before godel did his proof

godel would have know ramseys arguments

ramsey would have known godel used AR but said nothing

Ramsey says

Such an axiom has no place in mathematics, and anything which cannot be

proved without using it cannot be regarded as proved at all.

This axiom there is no reason to suppose true; and if it were true, this

would be a happy accident and not a logical necessity, for it is not a

tautology. (THE FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS* (1925) by F. P. RAMSEY

every one knew AR was invalid

they all knew godel used it

but nooooooooooooo one said -or has said anything for 76 years untill

dean

the theorem is a fraud the way godel presents it in his proof it is crap