0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
quote:Originally posted by McQueen(2) Similarly QM holds that electrical energy is conveyed by electrons. The generally accepted and wrongly held view , is that an electrical conductor resembles a tube filled with ping pong balls , when more ping balls are added at one end they are pushed out at the other end. This is false , electrons in a conductor are separated by a distance of more than one hundred thousand times their diameter. Which in real life terms is like a billiard ball trying to hit another billiard ball 6Kms away . To sum up the chances of this happening are slight. Again while observations show that electrical energy in a conductor is established at the speed of light , the observed velocities of electrons in a conductor carrying a current under a difference of potential is on the order of hundredths of a millimetre per sec. Compare this with the speed of light , at 300,000 Km/sec !! In nature all types of energy are mediated or conveyed by photons , this ranges from heat , light , electromagnetic radiation , you name it , are all carried by photons . What makes electrical energy any different ?
quote:Originally posted by McQueen(3) QM maintains that the photon is both a particle and a wave depending upon the way in which it is viewed. This is a totally false view of the photon and will be discussed later.
quote:Originally posted by McQueen(4) Because of the QM wave –particle duality view of the electron , the QM theory of electromagnetic radiation is weird. It states that a photon can follow an infinite number of paths and that its position and energy “crystallize” only at the point where it is detected or absorbed. Surely better alternatives exist than this ?That’s all for the moment but I will be following this up !
quote:Originally posted by McQueenThere exist several inconsistencies in the present quantum mechanics theory on subjects dealing with electromagnetic phenomenon , electric currents and the propagation of electromagnetic waves and above all the theory of wave-particle duality. These inconsistencies may be enumerated as follows:(1) When dealing with electromagnetic radiation QM holds that it is the oscillation or jiggling of electrons and ions within the crystal lattice of a conductor that causes electromagnetic radiation. This has been specifically disproved by the photoelectric effect wherein it is found that the photoelectric effect is not caused by the orbit of electrons around an atom giving off an electromagnetic wave in a continuous manner which causes electrons to escape the metal surface as is found in the photoelectric effect but rather that light of different energies causes electrons to give off photons of a specific energy which when absorbed by the electrons on the light sensitive plate , impart enough energy to these electrons to enable them to escape from the surface of the light sensitive plate. Thus electromagnetic radiation is not caused by the oscillatory motion of electrons but rather by the emission of photons. So although Maxwell’s theory works well in giving a description of the manner in which large numbers of photons behave ,it is intrinsically wrong because it attributes EM to causes other than the observed causative factors of EM.
quote:Energy not transmitted by photons:sound, thermal energy (conducted not radiated), radioactivity (alpha and beta particles) and some others. In fact, any energy transfer involving KE.Therefore, i don't think that your point is valid in the first place.
quote:Experiments (many of them) have shown that light travels in all possible paths. Take Youngs Double Slit experiment. The results cannot be comprehended in any other way. How else could a single photon interfere with itself other than by travelling through both slots? If it doesn't travel through both slits, then why does the interference not occur when using a single slit?
quote:Thus electromagnetic radiation is not caused by the oscillatory motion of electrons but rather by the emission of photons.
quote:Ok- so you are saying that the electron emits a photon to cause electromagnetic radiation. But as all electromagnetic radiation consists of photons, surely the oscillating electron also emits a photon to cause the electromagnetic radiation?What is the difference in the model that you are theorising?
quote:Originally posted by McQueenquote:Ok- so you are saying that the electron emits a photon to cause electromagnetic radiation. But as all electromagnetic radiation consists of photons, surely the oscillating electron also emits a photon to cause the electromagnetic radiation?What is the difference in the model that you are theorising?Right , the electron in its orbit , (always for the moment ignoring Schrodinger who is no longer essential ) emits photons , most of these photons are necessarily virtual photons. This is known as self interaction of the electron as exemplified by the Lamb Shift observed in the Hydrogen atom. Thus there is an experimental basis for the existence of virtual photons. Basically what this means is if virtual photons exist then the wave-particle duality so beloved by QM does not exist ! If wave particle duality no longer exists ( and the wave-particle duality by De Broglie was based on the presumption that the photon was both a particle and a wave , as observed (a) by Thomas Young and (b) by Einstein) much of QM is obsolete. The main point here is that if EM consists of photons , then Maxwell ‘s theory is no longer extant , it is a defunct theory.P.S See my model of the photon at ...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN