Why is QT paradoxical?

=================

The theory which we call Quantum Mechanics is a very

strange theory. Because when we are talking about mechanics

it means that we can imagine and see this process visual.

But the QM came with no visual aids, no model to picture

in one's mind. Now this theory is a purely mathematical

formalism, difficult to use and impossible to visualize.

It simple gives the right answers to the most complicated

theoretical question. Such situation satisfy maybe 99%

of physicists. But there are few physicists who don’t agree

with this situation. They want to understand QT without paradoxes.

I consider that these paradoxes are connected with only one reason:

" Nobody pays attention on geometrical form of particle".

===============..

Now the physicists follow " pure " mathematicians.

" Since the mathematical physicists have taken over,

theoretical physics has gone to pot.

The bizarre concepts generated out of the over use and

misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny if it were not

for the tragedy of the waste in time,

manpower, money, and the resulting misdirection."-

- said Richard Feynman.

There is difference between the " pure" mathematics

and the mathematics of theoretical physics.

" Pure" mathematics is infinite and the mathematics

of theoretical physics is limited by nature laws.

The " pure " mathematicians have all right to create

and use abstract models ( point, line …etc)

Physicists must use mathematical apparatus in connection

with real object, with real particle.

And they forgot about this fact.

For example.

1.

In thermodynamics particles are " mathematical point",

2.

In QT particles are " mathematical point",

3.

In SRT particles are points.

But according SRT the " mathematical point",

cannot be a firm " mathematical point" .

It means it is a " elastic point",

which can change its form. (??!!).

4.

When this " mathematical elastic point " fly with speed c=1

its form become flat circle.

/ not a " mathematical point" fly with speed c=1./

5.

In QED electron is elastic sphere,

which can change its form. (??!!).

6.

The power, impulse, linear and angular momentum

in physics is also a " mathematical point".

7.

Then one a " mathematical point" /particle/ interact

with another a " mathematical point" / power, impulse /

the physicists say: " The micro-world is paradoxical."

8.

If physicist think about particle as a " mathematical point"

the result can be only paradoxical.

And I am sure if somebody takes into consideration the

geometrical form of particle the paradoxes of QT will disappear.

========..

P.S.

Italy. Railway station.

It was more then two hours till the departure of the train.

I went to the café and ordered a cup of coffee. Soon two men

and a very beautiful, slim woman took place opposite me.

They ordered something to drink and one of the man opened a

case of violin and took out a bow. He began to explain something

about a bow , carefully and gently touching it. Then another man

took this bow and also enthusiastically continued this conversation.

For half an hour the bow was passed from one hands to another

following with enthusiastic discussion.

And the beautiful woman looked at both these men without saying a word.

For half an hour I watched this group with admiration and excitement.

What a class! What a cultural level! What a beauty!

=======================..

And now let's imagine the bow pressed into a "mathematical point"

and the musicians speak seriously about a " mathematical point "

which must produce a sound from a violin. Everybody will say I

describe an idiotic situation. Well, I agree.

But why don’t anybody say it to physicists when they observe the

elementary particle as a " mathematical point " , without paying

attention to its geometrical form.

==========..

P.S.

When Feynman said " I think I can safely say that nobody understands

quantum mechanics. " it was only because nobody took into consideration

the geometrical form of particle.

========================================