0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It is not always the quest but, it is what you learn from the quest. Many many inventions have come from this quest that have helped change the world or had lead to others that have. I myself have 4 inventions that have come from this quest. One I am presenting for contract with the US military, but it has many other uses as well. (it is not a weapon) PS Bored chemistThat is a blanket answer. You didn't truly answer the question.
BTW, the US military have done some monumentally stupid things in their time but even they are not gullible enough to buy a perpetual motion machine.
effectively centrifical drag
Just assuming a force such as gravity would cause some interference that could be eliminated by taking it beyond such a field.
Let's assume that Perpetual Motion is possible ---- then Perpetual Motion is possible. QEDYes, but just say it was. AAAAAAARRRRGGGGHHHHH
The objection to PM is summarised by the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.1st law essentially says that energy can neither be created or destroyed2nd law essentially says that heat flows from hotter to cooler (often summarised as 'entropy increases')Any system of PM must achieve 'over-unity' - ie you get more out than you put in. That is impossible according to the above laws.
If we based our whole lives on that statement there would be no point in getting up in the morning.
Quote from: Bikerman on 24/11/2008 16:45:52The objection to PM is summarised by the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.1st law essentially says that energy can neither be created or destroyed2nd law essentially says that heat flows from hotter to cooler (often summarised as 'entropy increases')Any system of PM must achieve 'over-unity' - ie you get more out than you put in. That is impossible according to the above laws.“We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up until now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.”Quote By Max Planck father of Quantum physics 1858 - 1947
Greetings Bikerman I see you are well versed. Very good for you might be able to see what I have truly been saying. Each action in a wheel system works by angle gravity and direction. Also each action overbalances a wheel. Now this is the basic theory for a perpetual wheel. Now in thousands of attempt that have been done they would move and then balance before another action can take place. This is an obvious and typical problem and used to show the impossibility of perpetual motion. Now lets take a system where each typical movement and expected but added together. movement reaction to another typical movement reaction, which react to another typical movement reaction creating a continuous overbalance to keep spinning and keep shifting until it breaks or something from the outside stops it. Each and every action by itself lays within the known laws of physics. But together since they react to each other setting them in motion perpetuating the reactions in a closed system. Now how can that break the laws of physics? Logic say it shouldn't but the physicist says it does. Under these circumstances if proven a new understanding will have to occur, no matter how hard the physicist says no. So under what I wrote here. How can you say it breaks the laws of physics?
Can you draw a cukoo on a cloud, perhaps.
But let's have some numbers from you. If there is enough energy to overcome the losses - plus some to spare, you must know where it is coming from and have an estimate of its value.Presumably you do understand the concept of energy and work.
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 25/11/2008 22:22:51But let's have some numbers from you. If there is enough energy to overcome the losses - plus some to spare, you must know where it is coming from and have an estimate of its value.Presumably you do understand the concept of energy and work. Well here are some numbers 20%. Out of a 100 lbs of weights in a wheel I keep 20% greater advantage. This is the same as 20 lbs value to the descending side 100% of the time constant spin. This is the numbers that count the rest is trivial.
That's not numbers - that is words. 20% greater than what? Sketch your device and, as I said, I will point out your error (and yes, there will be an error - there ALWAYS is in these cases).
Greetings Bikerman I have 20% more weight constant on the descending side of the wheel under constant shift of the total weight of the weights in the wheel. Since this is my secret and until all protections are in place. I can not show you what it is. Nor do I ask for money either so I am not a scamer. I work under an honest approach but personal design. Well all and all this is what Bessler had to deal with as well. But his was ready and the people just wanted it for free. Bessler could not afford to do that so he died with his secret and I may be the person who found it.
Greetings Bikerman A wager would be breaking the rules. But the real truth is. If I am correct a £1000 would as valuable like the penny you just didn't pick up for it wasn't worth the bother. Not to mention it would open up an opportunity for someone to take such a breakthrough for so little. 
Until you have a working machine nobody will believe you.Stop posting; start building
The problem everyone will encounter with most systems planned and dreamt up is in the fact that they all have common problems; wear on moving parts which contact other parts, friction and gravity.Why does everyone assume that perpetual motion must be a stable and uniform motion?