0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
As is shown in fig. 3 as result of microwave energy with frequency , the nitrogen atom should receive a momentum great enough, and as result of this gain, it will pass through hydrogen atoms in a symmetrical position, on the other face of hydrogen atoms plane. It is possible to accept as real this nitrogen atom change of position? If we keep the proportion and translate the phenomena to the real world it is similar to saying that a fly knock a car and the car is forced to leave the road. If a correlation between effects of microwaves and X-ray photons is made, other vexatious problems appear looking in the frame of quantum mechanics. An X-ray photon is able to liberate electrons from a material. Why X-ray is not able to liberate an entire nucleus? Why a microwave field is able to move an atom but is not able to liberate an electron from a material?
The text was posted in order to observe the difference between effects of quite equals photons over different atomic species. The actual explanation for ammonia molecule inversion is without any meaning. A microwave does not have enough energy to move an atom. The resonance phenomena (as is studied in experimental classical mechanics and electronics) has nothing to do with ammonia masers. It is impossible for a atom to resonate and to emit only one photon back. When the atom (or even an electron ) resonate, this means a oscillating movement around a equilibrium position. This means at every oscillation a photon of lower energy is emitted. Practically at a excitation with a microwave photon, it should appear as result a spectrum of microwave and radio (megahertz, and kilohertz) photons. Does this happened?NO.In this case please provide a mechanism for this resonance or leave it aside.
In the same time it is impossible physically for a atom to make a quantum salt from a position to another symmetrical position. If the quantum electron salt ,, can be accepted" the atomic salt NO.Why the same resonance does not work in infrared domain (using eventually other molecules)?
It is imppossible for a atom to resonate and to emit only one photon back. When the atom (or even an electron ) resonate, this means a oscillating movement around a equilibrium position. This means at every oscillation a photon of lower energy is emitted.
It's generally the microwave spectrum that deals with rotational levels ; vibrational levels are in the IR.
Up to date I have found a single book which recognise a situation not really pleasant for actual science. The book is Electronics through experiments by E T Glass, 1966 Centrex Publishing company- Eindhoven. In the Overview is writthe:A distinction may be made between macrocosmic electricity
, which employs as working hypothesys arbitrarily divisible electric charges, electrical and magnetic dipoles and certain experiences relating to the properties of materials, and microcosmic electricity, which uses ,,unit particles" as working hypotheses. The real nature is unknown. In describing the majority of hitherto essential phenomena in electricity, however, the terms ,,electron" has been found to be an extremely useful working hypothesis, valuable for development. [/b] The entire electricity and magnetism is build on this ,,working hypothesis".
But, now a new hypothesis is already formulated and is more consistent with experimental reality. Of course there are a lot of persons interested in maintaining actual working hypothesis form various reasons. Some of them are already known physicists with a consistent number of published papers or books; other are teachers close to the retirement, etc. How would they admit that a peaked unknown Romanian without perfume of Harvard or Cambridge is able to change a entire edifice of physics?I have put the experimental proofs that the electron working hypothesis is a fake but the reaction of forum readears was completely different from the expectations. Instead of repeating the experiments (banal experiments made home), and after that to contest or to admit the reality of proposed experiments, great part of them speak without sense (using the same old hypothesis). A microwave is not able to move any molecule from a material. A microwave transfer a specific energy only to electrons and therefore the heating effect appear. The same thing is valid for IR. A IR photon (which a particle) is not able to rotate a molecule as result of impact with this.
BC, the next post (again a on off switch post and few neurons ) will clear you some ideas about charge acceleration and radiation (especially microwave).
The real electronic has nothing to do with quantum hypothesis.