The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?

  • 19 Replies
  • 124853 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

This topic contains a post which is marked as Best Answer. Press here if you would like to see it.

Elbe Coetzee

  • Guest
Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« on: 30/10/2008 09:04:56 »
Elbe Coetzee  asked the Naked Scientists:

Hi there, Chris,

I absolutely love your program with Redi on 702.  I always listen to talk radio when I drive between appointments and your program is so interesting and delightful.  By the way, you have a very pleasant and easy so listen to voice, it often sounds as though you're about to smile or giggle.

I love the politeness of the English, the heritage and history of England, even the weather.  My husband and I are going to live in Reading for a year and a half, we're both looking forward to the experience.  Living amongst our 'own' people, Africa indeed is a tough continent!

Do 'chinese-type' people see the same 'amount' - vertically & horizontally etc. as 'big-eyed-people'?

Kind regards

Elbe Coetzee
Centurion
Pretoria

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 30/10/2008 16:05:39 by chris »
Logged
 



blakestyger

  • Guest
Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« Reply #1 on: 30/10/2008 09:20:20 »
The shape of the eye is the same for all, regardless of the shape the of the aperture the lids make. So, yes, they do the same visual field as Westerners.

A year and a half in Reading eh? With good behaviour and some luck you'll be out after 12 months!
Logged
 

Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« Reply #2 on: 30/10/2008 10:09:50 »
As blakestyger said, the aperture of the skin around the eye makes no difference to the height or width of the field of vision. Even the aperture of the iris makes no difference to these factors. It merely controls the amount of light entering the eye.

So you love our weather eh! Do us all a favour and take it back to Pretoria when you go home, and please bring some of your weather over with you when you come.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 

lyner

  • Guest
Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« Reply #3 on: 30/10/2008 13:24:31 »
Cats' eyes, on the other hand, have pupils which become vertical slits in bright light (as opposed to our round ones).
I have a theory that this is to preserve vertical resolution and also depth awareness even when the eyes are 'stopped down'.
What do you think?
Logged
 

Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« Reply #4 on: 30/10/2008 14:35:06 »
The aperture of a lens makes no difference to it's angle of view.

Look at these two pictures, they are identical in every respect, same camera, same lens (set at 50mm focal length), same camera position, same lighting, but in one shot the lens was stopped down to just f4.5 and in the other all the way down to f32.



The only visible difference between them is in the depth of field.

The top pic, taken at f32 has a greater depth of field but has not lost any of height or width of the angle of view of the lower picture which was taken with the lens openned up to an aperture of f4.5
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 



Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
« Reply #5 on: 30/10/2008 15:33:44 »
A change in the height and width of the angle of view would only be affected if the distance from the lens to the focal plane and/or the size of the focal plane sensor were to be altered.

In the case of a camera, the rear element of the lens remains static, therefore the distance between the lens and focal plane is always constant. The focal plane, being either the celluloid film or digital sensor, does not change in size. The same is true of the eye, except the eye has just the one static lens element where the camera has several, and the sensor in the eye is the retina.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 

Marked as best answer by on 06/12/2019 20:28:09

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8883
  • Activity:
    4%
  • Thanked: 138 times
    • View Profile
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #6 on: 31/10/2008 18:32:22 »
    I think males with heavy brows will have their field of view restricted by them.
    To extend the photographic analogies above, it would be like a too-long lens hood causing vignetting.
    The brow ridges of course protect the eyes from blows to the head, (why they are a male feature), but the trade-off is they do restrict the upper field of view: If a heavy-browed male wishes to look at the top shelf magazines he will have to tilt his head back when others need only move their eyes.
    « Last Edit: 31/10/2008 18:42:44 by RD »
    Logged
     

    Offline LeeE

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3382
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
      • View Profile
      • Spatial
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #7 on: 01/11/2008 14:40:56 »
    If the vertical slit in cat's eyes worked like a pin-hole camera, without a lens, it would increase the horizontal resolution, but as there is a lens it shouldn't make much difference.

    I say that it shouldn't make 'much' difference because the amount of spherical (do organic lens generally have spherical curves?) and chromatic aberration increases with the amount of curvature, so reducing the area of the lens that is used effectively makes the lens 'flatter' and reduces these aberrations.

    The image from vertical slit irises should therefore have slightly less horizontal aberration, and slightly more vertical aberration, than a round iris.  Ultimately though, the retina needs to be sensitive enough to make use of the info.
    Logged
    ...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8883
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 138 times
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #8 on: 01/11/2008 15:12:19 »
    We perceive our entire field of view as equally sharp, but only the central field  (about 2o ) is sharp on the retina (fovea),
    the eye moves to place different parts of the scene over this sharp central area,
    the brain builds up a picture of the scene using this high-resolution information.

    Quote
    The fovea comprises less than 1% of retinal size but takes up over 50% of the visual cortex in the brain.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea

    The distribution of neurology in retina and brain has evolved to match the limitations of the lens, (poor edge resolution / chromatic abberation).

    Spherical "abberation" is not a problem in the eye because the retina, (analogous to film in a camera), is hemi-spherical, (unlike flat film).
    « Last Edit: 01/11/2008 15:17:24 by RD »
    Logged
     



    Offline LeeE

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3382
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
      • View Profile
      • Spatial
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #9 on: 02/11/2008 13:04:08 »
    Quote
    Spherical "abberation" is not a problem in the eye because the retina, (analogous to film in a camera), is hemi-spherical, (unlike flat film)

    Doh! - of course - thanks.
    Logged
    ...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
     

    Offline changz

    • First timers
    • *
    • 9
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #10 on: 02/11/2008 17:29:27 »
    Just to follow up on this question. If all eyes see about the same field of vision, evolutionarily speaking, why are larger eyes generally more attractive in most cultures around the world than otherwise?
    Logged
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8883
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 138 times
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #11 on: 02/11/2008 20:14:57 »
    Having large eyes, relative to the size of the face, is a feature of infants.

     [ Invalid Attachment ]         source

    The emotional response to large eyes so readily triggered that the large eyes of a cartoon animal can trigger
    an emotional response in some people: it's not a human, it's not even realistic, but still some people will go "awhh".

    * sadpuppy.jpg (26.52 kB, 666x477 - viewed 71420 times.)
    « Last Edit: 02/11/2008 22:02:36 by RD »
    Logged
     

    lyner

    • Guest
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #12 on: 02/11/2008 21:25:01 »
    Quote
    If the vertical slit in cat's eyes worked like a pin-hole camera, without a lens, it would increase the horizontal resolution, but as there is a lens it shouldn't make much difference.
    'Fraid not: the bigger vertical aperture would lead to a higher acuity in the vertical.
    "Angle of first diffraction zero is inversely proportional to aperture"

    This applies to a hole or a lens. The lens merely changes the position of the image. But I wasn't concerned with the diffraction limit.
    What I was referring to is the depth of focus which would be more sensitive when focusing on horizontal edges  (i.e. vertical spatial frequencies)  then on vertical ones.
    Or are we agreeing? Can't be sure.
    « Last Edit: 02/11/2008 21:27:39 by sophiecentaur »
    Logged
     



    Offline LeeE

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3382
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
      • View Profile
      • Spatial
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #13 on: 03/11/2008 00:36:31 »
    I think we're disagreeing [:D]

    There's no diffraction in a pin-hole camera - the size of the 'pin-hole' you'd find in a pin-hole camera is zillions of times larger than the wavelength of light.

    If resolution increased with aperture size in a pin-hole camera you could do away with the aperture entirely - it would be just like just holding the film towards what you were trying to photograph, without using a camera at all.
    Logged
    ...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8883
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 138 times
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #14 on: 03/11/2008 01:13:55 »
    Diffraction does noticeably soften the image with large f-numbers, e.g. f22 on a 50mm lens, i.e. a 2.3mm aperture.
    So the diffraction with a pinhole (say 0.25mm) is severe: the resolution of pinhole images is very poor because of diffraction.
    (Pinhole images do have "infinite" depth of field though)


     [ Invalid Attachment ]

    http://www.pinholephotography.org/

    * St%20Marks%20Square%20vsml.jpg (37.3 kB, 900x754 - viewed 62812 times.)
    « Last Edit: 04/11/2008 14:03:42 by RD »
    Logged
     

    Offline LeeE

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3382
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
      • View Profile
      • Spatial
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #15 on: 03/11/2008 16:11:43 »
    Well, I've got to admit that I was only aware of the 'circle of confusion' issues and didn't know about the diffraction effects.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinhole_camera#Selection_of_pinhole_size
    Logged
    ...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8883
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 138 times
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #16 on: 04/11/2008 14:00:08 »
    The optimum aperture for a typical camera lens, (i.e. which produces the sharpest overall image), is usually f8-f11. Using a smaller aperture, say f22, reduces the resolution from this optimum, i.e. small apertures (large f-numbers) soften / blur the image by diffraction.
    Logged
     



    Offline rosy

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1015
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
    • Chemistry
      • View Profile
    Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #17 on: 04/11/2008 15:30:22 »
    Quote
    I think males with heavy brows will have their field of view restricted by them.
    My pa, who was doing a PhD (or possibly it was a post doc) using lasers had to have a visual field eye test. The optician got all worried that his visual field had been damaged until he observed that the thing at the top of what he could see was undoubtedly eyebrow so probably the effect was physiological rather than pathological...
    Logged
     

    Offline antony96

    • First timers
    • *
    • 3
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Naked Science Forum Newbie
      • View Profile
    Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #18 on: 18/04/2018 14:34:54 »
    My pa, who was doing a PhD (or possibly it was a post doc) using lasers had to have a visual field eye test. The optician got all worried that his visual field had been damaged until he observed that the thing at the top of what he could see was undoubtedly eyebrow so probably the effect was physiological rather than pathological...
    Logged
     

    Offline Colin2B

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ********
    • 4459
    • Activity:
      15.5%
    • Thanked: 377 times
      • View Profile
    Re: Do people with Chinese-type eyes see less in the vertical direction?
    « Reply #19 on: 18/04/2018 15:03:17 »
    Quote from: antony96 on 18/04/2018 14:34:54
    My pa, who was doing a PhD (or possibly it was a post doc) using lasers had to have a visual field eye test. The optician got all worried that his visual field had been damaged until he observed that the thing at the top of what he could see was undoubtedly eyebrow so probably the effect was physiological rather than pathological...
    @antony96 , welcome to the forum.
    Can I ask why you have copied a previous post and posted it as your own?
    Did you mean to quote it and then comment? If so you will find a quote function in the ‘actions’ drop down top right of the post.
    I hope you enjoy the forum and are able to participate in any threads that interest you.
    Logged
    and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
    the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    Why will the same situation cause some people to choose a fight response and other to choose a flight response?

    Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 1
    Views: 2873
    Last post 08/08/2016 23:31:55
    by evan_au
    Why Do People Wave at and Wave From Boats ?

    Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 5
    Views: 9836
    Last post 14/07/2018 09:20:33
    by Colin2B
    Why are more people right handed than left handed?

    Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 4
    Views: 5494
    Last post 12/01/2018 07:12:19
    by Monox D. I-Fly
    Why Are Some People Short-sighted and others Long Sighted ?

    Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 7
    Views: 7009
    Last post 21/10/2018 15:56:56
    by Catastrophe
    How many people answered "annoyed "?

    Started by Eric A. TaylorBoard General Science

    Replies: 15
    Views: 7364
    Last post 07/12/2010 00:06:40
    by Geezer
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.208 seconds with 84 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.