The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. John Titor Hoax
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

John Titor Hoax

  • 3 Replies
  • 5226 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ultima (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 488
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • My Homepage
John Titor Hoax
« on: 04/04/2005 11:25:31 »
Just wondering if anyone has looked at the John Titor time traveling hoax from 2001, it's quite elaborate [:D]. With John Titor going into a fair bit of detail about how his machine works etc.

The following are the main sites about John Titor, which interestingly are all DNS registered by dummy companies with blank indexes by the same person:

http://johntitor.strategicbrains.com/
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com
http://www.johntitor.com

With a book being sold, with profits going to "The John Titor Foundation" it looks like John Titor aka some guy out in the world is getting rich.

Plus John Titor.... In Terminator John was the guy who came back from the future to save the world from WWIII [:D]

The best part is looking at how completely people can get sucked in…


wOw the world spins?
Logged
wOw the world spins?
 



Offline gsmollin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 749
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: John Titor Hoax
« Reply #1 on: 06/04/2005 00:15:48 »
I'm accepting venture capital for my new company that will be making perpetual motion machines. Before you scoff at this, let me explain the source of their power- the never-ending-gullibility of the public. Now it doesn't sound so far fetched, does it?
Logged
"F = ma, E = mc^2, and you can't push a string."
 

Offline chimera

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: John Titor Hoax
« Reply #2 on: 06/04/2005 02:23:32 »
Yeah, I took a look at it about a year ago. Abso-lu-te horse manure, but it looks like someone is having a ball indeed.

Even did a bit of backtracking of who it could be (the poster of the JT messages), and I think it's an old gamer, because there used to be a game that could literally have served as a kind of script for this hoax.

Pretty lame way of making a buck, tho. Also strikes me as typically American, in a way. It does take a lot of 'belief' in the supernatural, and I really think this would not have been more than a fancy anywhere else.

The percentage of Americans believing 'openly' in fantastic things is quite astonishing. UFO's, the lot. Tens of millions of possible customers for you-name-your-miracle.

It seems superstition and religion are closely tied in to the human psyche...
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 

Offline mr_bumpkin

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: John Titor Hoax
« Reply #3 on: 21/04/2005 17:12:50 »
I just got done reading a bunch of those sites.   Had me going for a while, to be honest.  

2 holes:    
1.   How would time travel to a similar dimension change anything about the time paradoxes?    If he's here, it's safe to say a virtually identical copy of him landed in his own timeline.  

2.   Common misconception about the idea of similar dimensions where certain world events vary:    You forget genetics and the mechanics of birth.    If your parents had sex on a different day, or any number of factors,  a different sperm and egg could have combined leading to a different child being born than you.

His theory about millions of worlds with radically different versions of you on them having actually been observed by travelers is improbable.    Odds are most of those worlds wouldn't have a version of you in them at all.

A 2% difference between worlds in 1975 would lead to a much much more massive difference by 2036, because so many things are so totally butterfly effect intensive.
Logged
 
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

What would you say to Henry VIII in say 1540AD ? or John Capri in 2340AD?

Started by allan marshBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 11252
Last post 10/10/2014 20:37:05
by yor_on
Does aspirin interact with St. John's Wort?

Started by Morag Selkirk Board Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 12109
Last post 14/02/2009 22:02:19
by DrN
John Ross pioneering chemist

Started by jeffreyHBoard Famous Scientists, Doctors and Inventors

Replies: 3
Views: 4244
Last post 08/09/2019 15:44:05
by Bored chemist
St John's Wort

Started by Ian33Board Complementary Medicine

Replies: 8
Views: 15550
Last post 11/06/2008 19:52:57
by Bored chemist
Victim of an Adult Site Blackmail Email Hoax?

Started by chrisBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 35
Views: 18005
Last post 02/12/2020 21:30:48
by chris
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.095 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.