0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Case One: Matter can change into photons. An electron and a positron will annihilate each other when they collide. Two photons come out of the collision. Each photon has the energy of one of the particles. This would necessarily happen if the electron and positron were made of photons. Necessarily means that if this did not happen, it would falsify the concept; Karl Popper can be happy since the concept is falsifiable. Alternatively, we have to assume the two particles hide themselves by some unknown method and generate energy equal to their mass in accord with E = mcc for some unknown reason. The later is philosophically flawed. It violates Occam's Razor.
Case Six: Time slows for a moving object. Time dilation is a natural consequence of the photon construct of nature. The repetition rate of patterns in Atoms must slow when atoms move. This is because the overall distance a photon must move to remain in the pattern is greater when the containing object is moving. Since the photon is already moving at the speed of light and can't move any faster, it uses more time to complete the pattern. The repetition rate of these patterns is the final arbiter of time in all things. So time slows for a moving object. And knowing this, we can also know that the effect of the slowing of time is accumulative for the moving object. We can solve the so called "twin paradox" simply by knowing which twin moved the greater distance relative to the special fixed frame of reference in space. No matter that our instruments can't determine that fixed frame, it still must exist. Instruments can't detect it because all instruments are effected by movement just exactly as they would necessarily be effected if they were made of photons.
Case Nine: The electron has no solid core. All attempts to measure a size for an electron that is smaller than its classic electron diameter have shown that there is nothing there. This indicates that an electron only exists at its electromagnetic diameter. This would naturally and necessarily be the case if the electron were a one-photon particle. There is no philosophically sound alternative.
Case Twelve: The http://photontheory.com/uncertain.html [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register] is a natural consequence of the photon construct of matter as explained by the target of the link. It is caused by the natural tendency of resonance in photons. Resonance is dependent upon the phase relationship between an absorbing target and approaching photon. The approaching photon will bypass an out-of-phase target for an in-phase target even when the in-phase target is some distance away. And since a photon is only potential energy, any sensing of it must convert at least some of the potential energy to actual energy. This changes the photon as is observed in Uncertainty Phenomena. This is naturally and necessarily exactly what must happen in a photon construct for the universe.
Now I'm getting really paranoid and don't know whether to click it or not...
The whole thing about Quantum Phenomena, the absolute cause of it, and there ain't nothing else that does cause it, is that the heart and soul of a photon is the littlest point they is and that point is electromagnetically saturated. It is a magnet as strong as a magnet can possibly be and it is an electric charge as strong as electric can possibly get. And since a single photon consists of two half cycles, each half cycle has its own point.You had to know that so you can know how gravity works. You see, that same Quantum Phenomena is what causes gravity. The way it does cause it is that, the saturated point of a photon reaches saturation as it moves through the diminished small effect of the charge fields of all other photons in the universe. That makes the point get to saturation amplitude closer toward the strongest effect of the combined fields.So, actually, gravity is really just Quantum Phenomena. The root of it is the saturation amplitude of photons. They ain't but just so much amplitude space can support for the electric and magnetic charges of a photon. If you think on it awhile you will see that Planck's constant takes up half of that available amplitude, and gravity takes up the other half. That's how you get gravity out of light. That's how Quantum Phenomena makes gravity happen.
It would be easier perhaps to see photons as 'probabilities' existing everywhere, until observation, that is.Then you could see that as a analogue to your 'virtual photons' and also as a field existing at all times (except when observed:).
Did you see my Edit: I found this site that reports the results of the 2003 experiment.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077353/ [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register] my original thinking about the speed of the propagation of the effects of gravity.
Don't take it to seriously, what i wrote Vern.It's very approximative and I will definitely change my mind an awful lot of times on this one.And I don't think it collide with your ideas.As the energy creating it easily could be seen as waves.Although photons to me have a 'real' duality, both as waves and and as particles.But you said that you saw them as having 'paths' if i got it right?How then do you see their 'particle like' structure.'Gravity' was a result of the photons saturation/interactions with other photons, right?Do you have an idea of how matter might 'appear' from photons too?
Another problem I have though is that if photons somehow create 'matter', how then do you treat motion.
Ok Vern.You said "Motion is simply a group of such patterns moving through space."How do they get trapped in that 'resonant pattern'?It's like there are several different motions, all at the same time.You have the photons 'resonant pattern' moving, then, on a macroscopic plane, you have the motion of that said object. So you have photons creating matter as well as gravity.And you have spacetime wherein this takes place?Or am I looking at it wrongly?
Ok, I will read up on it some more:)But I'm still curious to if you differ between our (3D space and time) and photons/gravity/matter?
Vern can you implementation ground broken experiment for the mainstreams about tired quantum to produce red-shifted Sunís spectrum. It needs few thousand dollars. You can call your friends to help you. I see you have good knowledge in physics. If you are agreeing please send me your CV, or shortly who are you. By E-mail only.Good luck!
If you are agreeing please send me your CV, or shortly who are you. By E-mail only.Good luck!
It seems to me that you would need some sort of gravitational ' electromagnetic field' connecting all spacetime for it to work?Like some sort of supra leading 'magnetic field' that will keep 'things' like Suns and Earths in 'place' not caring for any aberration:)That might work, but if it would be electro-magnetic it seems to me that we should see effects of it in biological material etc.
Vern, i have a theory which can collaborate yours mathematically. Willing to see it?
The main ideas of the paper are:1) An electron is created when a gamma ray of very high frequency interacts with a similar ray under a minimum energy condition. The gamma ray is bent so strongly that it forms a stable resonating circle. An equation to find the diameter of the electron from its mass is derived from three other basic equations. The diameter of the electron is found to be several orders of magnitude larger than previously accepted.2) In terms of electron mass taken equal to unity, by the Photon Theory, the total mass of the proton and that of the neutron are found to agree with past measurements; however, there are two new inner photon shells in each of the particles which have not been acknowledged or named.3) The charge of an electron develops from asymmetry when the photon goes into resonance. There is recent experimental evidence of this. Single photons are now trapped in resonant cavities and found to exhibit electric charge.4) The electromagnetic amplitude available at any one point in space is the maximum value equal to Planck's constant.5) "Massive" objects are comprised only of photons. The mutual attraction of "masses" is explained.6) Wave-particle duality is explained as the observation of maxima of waves, which previously have been assumed to be particles.7) A red shift of certain spectrum lines is described by partial absorption of photons, contradicting the part of Quantum Mechanics, which states that only complete photons can be absorbed. The universe is in a steady-state condition- where photons are being continuously changed into mass and vice versa. This opposes the expansion theory of the universe (the "big bang"). However, it is not the same as The Hoyle Steady-State Theory, wherein mass is created from nothing.9) Ultimately, all mass and energy are effects of the time variant cause, photon action. This does not allow the existence of a massive neutrino. Neutrinos must be mass less.10) The theory exhibits complementarity with Einstein's principle of special relativity except Postulate 2 (inertial frame of reference) and complementarity with Quantum Mechanics except for the item referred in (7) above.