The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks

  • 34 Replies
  • 22511 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

paul.fr

  • Guest
Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
« on: 21/01/2009 19:37:16 »
Seems strange to post this here, but the sub-heading does say Evolution.

A Mississippi lawmaker has introduced a bill that would require textbooks to include a disclaimer describing evolution as a "controversial theory" and advising students to keep an "open mind" to other explanations for the origin of life.

Rep. Gary Chism introduced the legislation, House Bill 25, earlier this month. The bill has been referred to two committees, Education and Judiciary A.

The proposal, if enacted, would require the State Board of Education to include the 200-word disclaimer on the inside front cover of textbooks that include evolution topics.

"The word 'theory' has many meanings, including: systematically organized knowledge; abstract reasoning; a speculative idea or plan; or a systematic statement of principles," the opening paragraph of the bill states. "Scientific theories are based on both observations of the natural world and assumptions about the natural world. They are always subject to change in view of new and confirmed observations."

"This textbook discusses evolution, a controversial theory some scientists present as a scientific explanation for the origin of living things. No one was present when life first appeared on earth. Therefore, any statement about life's origins should be considered a theory," the proposal continues.

"Evolution refers to the unproven belief that random, undirected forces produced living things. There are many topics with unanswered questions about the origin of life which are not mentioned in your textbook, including: the sudden appearance of the major groups of animals in the fossil record (known as the Cambrian Explosion); the lack of new major groups of other living things appearing in the fossil record; the lack of transitional forms of major groups of plants and animals in the fossil record; and the complete and complex set of instructions for building a living body possessed by all living things."

The textbook disclaimer would end with the following advice: "Study hard and keep an open mind."

Other states have proposed similar disclaimers.

Alabama is currently the only state that requires a disclaimer on evolution be included in science textbooks discussing the topic. The most recent version of the text was adopted by the Alabama State Board of Education in 2005.

Much of the language of the Mississippi proposal has been adopted from the 1995 and 2001 versions of the Alabama disclaimer, according to the National Center for Science Education, an organization which advocates the teaching of evolution in public schools.

In March 2002, the Cobb County School District in Georgia approved a short disclaimer on evolution for the inside front cover of biology and other science textbooks.

"This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered," the label stated.

The issue went to court after four parents filed suit against the district. A federal district court judged ruled that the disclaimers were unconstitutional. The district appealed the decision. The case was referred by an appeals court to a district court for clarification but the district later agreed in a settlement not to make any disclaimers about evolution

http://christianpost.com/Education/Creation_evolution/2009/01/evolution-disclaimer-proposed-for-miss-textbooks-20/
Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #1 on: 21/01/2009 19:38:20 »
    R-soles
    Logged
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 151 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #2 on: 22/01/2009 03:16:18 »
    Y'all aint frrm arand heah: y've only git fhav digits oan each haind.  [:)]
    « Last Edit: 22/01/2009 08:59:53 by RD »
    Logged
     

    Offline _Stefan_

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • 814
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
      • View Profile
      • My Photobucket Album
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #3 on: 22/01/2009 07:44:05 »
    This is the tactic that creationists are using to inject unscientific propaganda into the science classroom.

    If people want more information about this issue, they should contact http://ncseweb.org/
    Logged
    Stefan
    "No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish." -David Hume
     

    Offline Don_1

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6889
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 9 times
    • A stupid comment for every occasion.
      • View Profile
      • Knight Light Haulage
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #4 on: 22/01/2009 08:00:59 »
    As an atheist and evolutionist, I have to agree that much of the evolutionary theory is indeed just that, theory. But much of the theory does have substantial paleontological evidence to back it up.

    Still I would not object to such a disclaimer on one condition, that being that a similar disclaimer on creation should be inserted into all books teaching or professing Creation, including The Bible.
    Logged
    If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
     



    Offline BenV

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1502
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #5 on: 22/01/2009 08:47:10 »
    Quote from: Don_1 on 22/01/2009 08:00:59
    As an atheist and evolutionist, I have to agree that much of the evolutionary theory is indeed just that, theory. But much of the theory does have substantial paleontological evidence to back it up.

    Still I would not object to such a disclaimer on one condition, that being that a similar disclaimer on creation should be inserted into all books teaching or professing Creation, including The Bible.

    Why just on creation?  A disclaimer on the bible would be great.
    Logged
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 151 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #6 on: 22/01/2009 09:11:38 »
    A geological period is named after Mississippi ...

    Quote
    The Mississippian is an epoch in the geologic timescale or a series of the geologic record. It is the earliest/lowermost of two divisions of the Carboniferous period lasting from roughly 359 to 318 Ma (million years ago). As with most other geochronologic units, the rock beds that define the Mississippian are well identified, but the exact start and end dates are uncertain by a few million years. The Mississippian is so named because rocks from this age are exposed in the Mississippi River valley.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippian

    Will the Mississippians be campaigning to have their state's name removed from this blasphemy ?...

    Quote
    James Ussher (sometimes spelled Usher) (4 January 1581–21 March 1656) was Anglican Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland between 1625–1656. He was a prolific scholar, who most famously published a chronology that purported to time and date creation to the night preceding 23 October 4004 BC, [calculated from a literal reading of the Bible].
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Ussher
    « Last Edit: 22/01/2009 09:27:45 by RD »
    Logged
     

    Offline Don_1

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6889
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 9 times
    • A stupid comment for every occasion.
      • View Profile
      • Knight Light Haulage
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #7 on: 22/01/2009 09:51:35 »
    Quote from: BenV on 22/01/2009 08:47:10
    Why just on creation?  A disclaimer on the bible would be great.

    Yes, good point.

    'This book is intended as a model for the manner in which individuals should conduct themselves. Persons and events quoted herein may or maynot be factual. Other versions and theories are available.'
    Logged
    If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
     

    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #8 on: 22/01/2009 10:49:17 »
    I'm waiting for a comment from  Asyncritus about this.
    Logged
     



    Offline BenV

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1502
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #9 on: 22/01/2009 11:34:14 »
    He's been much more selective of late, and admited in another thread that his problem is not with evolution, it's with any science that draws his perception of god into question.
    Logged
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 151 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #10 on: 22/01/2009 13:47:25 »
    A replacement for Asyncritus can be googled from this page ...

     [ Invalid Attachment ]

    * EVO.PNG (19.45 kB, 533x182 - viewed 1520 times.)
    Logged
     

    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #11 on: 22/01/2009 19:04:41 »
    Same old garbage and the usual lack of understanding of statistics and probability.
    Logged
     

    Offline DoctorBeaver

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 12653
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
    • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #12 on: 23/01/2009 18:47:11 »
    Quote from: Don_1 on 22/01/2009 09:51:35
    Quote from: BenV on 22/01/2009 08:47:10
    Why just on creation?  A disclaimer on the bible would be great.

    Yes, good point.

    'This book is intended as a model for the manner in which individuals should conduct themselves...

    Does that apply to the Old or New Testament?
    Logged
     



    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #13 on: 23/01/2009 22:32:16 »
    Bits of both, but there's less blood, guts and bollocks in the NT.
    Don't throw out the moral baby with the bigoted bathwater. Some of the authors really meant it for the best. It's mostly been the interpreters (=politicians) who've ruined the messages.
    Logged
     

    Offline DoctorBeaver

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 12653
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
    • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #14 on: 23/01/2009 23:05:40 »
    The OT is full of smiting!
    Logged
     

    Offline Don_1

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6889
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 9 times
    • A stupid comment for every occasion.
      • View Profile
      • Knight Light Haulage
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #15 on: 24/01/2009 14:31:10 »
    Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 23/01/2009 23:05:40
    The OT is full of smiting!

    Not that I've read The Bible for a very many moons, but from what I recall, thi-smite be true.

    All sex & violence with smiting and begetting all over the place.
    Logged
    If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
     

    Offline DoctorBeaver

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 12653
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
    • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #16 on: 24/01/2009 14:38:37 »
    Quote from: Don_1 on 24/01/2009 14:31:10
    Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 23/01/2009 23:05:40
    The OT is full of smiting!

    Not that I've read The Bible for a very many moons, but from what I recall, thi-smite be true.

    All sex & violence with smiting and begetting all over the place.

    And slaves. Don't forget the slaves.
    Logged
     



    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #17 on: 25/01/2009 00:37:16 »
    They also had big heads because there are so many "begats".
    Logged
     

    Offline DoctorBeaver

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 12653
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
    • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #18 on: 25/01/2009 12:37:05 »
    Quote from: sophiecentaur on 25/01/2009 00:37:16
    They also had big heads because there are so many "begats".

    Someone shoot him - PLEASE!
    Logged
     

    Offline Don_1

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6889
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 9 times
    • A stupid comment for every occasion.
      • View Profile
      • Knight Light Haulage
  • Best Answer
  • Evolution Disclaimer Proposed for Mississippi Textbooks
    « Reply #19 on: 25/01/2009 12:48:58 »
    Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 25/01/2009 12:37:05
    Quote from: sophiecentaur on 25/01/2009 00:37:16
    They also had big heads because there are so many "begats".

    Someone shoot him - PLEASE!


    Your wish is my command

    'Begats'!!!!!!!!!! Doh!!!!!!!
    Logged
    If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...

    Started by MangalmurtiBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 5
    Views: 4702
    Last post 03/10/2018 20:03:37
    by Bored chemist
    When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation

    Started by nismo1Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 3
    Views: 3816
    Last post 29/09/2011 15:07:26
    by nismo1
    The evolution of man "Homo Sapiens" 200 thousand years into the future

    Started by Alan McDougallBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 6
    Views: 16517
    Last post 18/11/2008 18:57:49
    by Alan McDougall
    Can DNA evolution switches in transparent animals change electron energy levels?

    Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Chemistry

    Replies: 1
    Views: 2434
    Last post 09/07/2016 12:37:49
    by puppypower
    The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity

    Started by paul.frBoard That CAN'T be true!

    Replies: 33
    Views: 18834
    Last post 20/02/2009 01:47:43
    by _Stefan_
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.207 seconds with 81 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.