I guess then that is the trick to know when we are quoting physics or conjecturing.

So.

Discussion on black holes physics or conjecture.

Conjecture. But it's more towards physics than towards conjecture, because of many reasons, theoretical and experimental. Theoretical from General Relativity, which is a strong physical theory, not just speculation, and experimental because there are oservational evidences of the existence of black holes, even if we still don't have that certainty. For the subject of FTL, instead, it's

*all another story*, it's totally conjecture.

Discussion on big bang physics or conjecture.

Similar to the previous, but more conjecture.

Discussion on the universe(infinite or not)physics or conjecture

I would say much more conjecture than the previous (and infact I'm not particularly interested in that subject).

Discussion on FTL physics or conjecture.

See up.

So I guess we come full circle.

You say FTL not possible. Physics.

I say why not.Conjecture.

No, you haven't said that, you have said that I don't know if it's possible or not to overcome light speed, and here you are wrong, because actually I know it very well, it's what (universally recognized) physics says, so it's

on you to show us why you can make the statement that I don't know if it's possible or not to go FTL...