The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. Question of the Week
  4. QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)

  • 9 Replies
  • 9405 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DodgeyDamo (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« on: 11/03/2009 07:38:26 »
I'd like to know 'Why are Australian snakes SO Toxic?"
 
If we assume that the LD50 tests on mice would have similar outcomes for humans, then what makes Australian Elapid snakes so toxic in comparison to Vipers/Colurbids?

Would it be fair to say that the toxins and venom delivery systems (fangs) of Vipers are more "efficient" that that of Elapids and therefor from a Evo-Bio-Geographical view, has the absence of Vipers from Australia (an effect of Wallace's line?) "saved" our lovely Elapids from being "outcompeted? The main problem with this, that I can see, is that Elapids and Vipers happily(?)coexist in Asia and Africa......

I also thought it may be due to climate...Australia has undergone major climate change since it separated from Gondwana, and has dried out considerably since....so I thought maybe Australian snakes evolved a kind of

'envenomate that prey item so much, it dies then and there, therefor Taipan doesn't have to spend energy looking for where its final resting place may be" which I thought may have had some kind of selection pressure for our Joe Blakes, but America and Africa have also undergone massive climate change over the past few million years....

Or is it that Australia extant/extinct Fauna take/took more venom to kill?

Thanks Guys
DodgeyDamo [O8)]
« Last Edit: 22/03/2009 21:57:30 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #1 on: 11/03/2009 07:45:40 »
See if http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=1006041000146 helps. [:)]
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #2 on: 12/03/2009 21:05:02 »
As stated in that article, co-evolutionary factors may play a part. However, Australila is mostly desert and consequently prey is comparitively rare compared to other regions on Earth. The snake would need to ensure that if it bit the bite would kill.

Sidewinders that live in deserts also have highly effective venom.

It is not true in all cases, but I think it may be 1 of the factors involved.
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #3 on: 13/03/2009 04:27:16 »
It's just as well that they can't swim across the ditch!
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #4 on: 13/03/2009 04:59:29 »
But they could hitch a lift with a boatload of illegal immigrant Bruces.
Logged
 



Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #5 on: 13/03/2009 05:03:35 »
Nah, they'll all be dead by the time they've arrived. [xx(]
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #6 on: 13/03/2009 05:05:14 »
They'd probably get lost & arrive at Norfolk Island.
Logged
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #7 on: 13/03/2009 12:13:04 »
And maybe by concentrating the venom more, they waste less water
Logged
 

Offline DodgeyDamo (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #8 on: 20/03/2009 04:30:06 »
Chemistry4me thanks for the link...but I didn't agree with much of what was posted there...

Doctor Beaver and Madidus_Scientia thanks for your replies.

Madidus_Scientia >> The water/cost is a point I hadn't thought about...interesting....but many(?) vipers also live in desert regions...with "less concentrated(?)" venom. And also some Elapids not only produce a more toxic venom but they also produce more of it when envenoming their prey....so any water saved by concentrating the venom would be lost by over production....     

Doctor Beaver >> prey is comparatively rare in Australia's desert...but up to 50 species of small terrestrial (bite sized) mammals went extinct from these areas due to the introduction of Cats/Foxes/Rabbits and the eradication of Dingoes and Aboriginal people. Rabbits obviously not a direct threat to mammals but huge numbers provided prey base for foxes which ate everything as they spread through the continent....Dingoes and Australian Aboriginal peoples killed and ate cats thus keeping their numbers to a minimum...untill they themselves were killed by white pastoralists... and also it has only been in the last million years or so that Australia has had any deserts...historically its pretty much always been hotter and wetter....Wouldn't this equate to more prey availability thus negating selection for higher venom toxicity?

But on the other hand, most Australian snakes diets contain a relatively high proportion of skinks and amphibians.....both abundant in arid Australia (Yes we have desert frogs...)  so the absence of presence/absence of mammals shouldn't matter too much anyway.....!

I think Current distributions of prey density in Australia are very skewed away from what what would have been the norm for much of the time elapidae was evolving in Australia...so I don't think that lower prey density could have been a driving force for the evolution of such a high proportion of highly toxic serpentines in Australia... 

Does anyone know of any studies into the efficiency/costs of elapidae vs viperdae venom?

 [O8)]
Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 09.03.29 - Why are Australian snakes so toxic? (Elapids vs Vipers)
« Reply #9 on: 21/03/2009 22:28:01 »
Quote
...but up to 50 species of small terrestrial (bite sized) mammals went extinct from these areas due to the introduction of Cats/Foxes/Rabbits and the eradication of Dingoes and Aboriginal people. Rabbits obviously not a direct threat to mammals but huge numbers provided prey base for foxes which ate everything as they spread through the continent....Dingoes and Australian Aboriginal peoples killed and ate cats thus keeping their numbers to a minimum...untill they themselves were killed by white pastoralists... and also it has only been in the last million years or so that Australia has had any deserts...historically its pretty much always been hotter and wetter

Facts of which I was unaware. Thank you for enlightening me.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

QotW - 15.08.24 - Why do major keys sound happy and minor keys sound mournful?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 8956
Last post 05/04/2018 03:06:55
by Monox D. I-Fly
QotW - 08.04.06 - Better to drink wine than to drink nothing?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 24
Views: 33237
Last post 07/04/2018 12:49:50
by Bored chemist
QotW - 18.08.02 - Why are non-stick pans non-stick?

Started by Adam MurphyBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 4
Views: 2006
Last post 11/08/2018 17:51:43
by wolfekeeper
QotW - 10.03.28 - Is a human bite worse than a dog bite?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 14471
Last post 13/01/2019 09:40:37
by chris
QotW - 11.03.06 - How do pain medications target pain?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 7
Views: 12866
Last post 18/01/2018 21:08:11
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.158 seconds with 59 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.