0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.
These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.
The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves. This is how it goes!
It it also easy to realize that outside the visible universe the is an area, where is really much more energy than the visible universe has all together and the energy some where out there is much denser than than it is in a visible universe.
Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.
You say, space start expanding faster same time when quasars born!
Because there born quasars, there start moving more energy between expanding photons and that energy get photons expanding faster!
With his ability to "think outside the box" I wonder what he'd come up with if he could come back to life now and see all the new knowledge we have acquired, all the new theories that have been devised, since his death.
It came as a result of his dissatisfaction with the quantum condition in Bohr's orbit theory and his belief that atomic spectra should really be determined by some kind of eigenvalue problem. For this work he shared with Dirac the Nobel Prize for 1933.
The fact that redshift can be interpreted in two ways is a subtle but important point. When objects are close to Earth, their redshifts should be interpreted as coming from Doppler shifts due to relative motion. When objects are far from Earth, their redshifts should be interpreted as coming from the cosmological stretching of space. Be sure that students understand the concept of the stretching of space, because they will need it to understand the big bang in the next section.
If we placed some measuring instruments at a precise distance of each other in outer space, shouldn't they too be expected to have a growing distance due to 'expansion'? We could try to send two satellites equipped with lasers for that exact measurement perhaps?
Inflationary bubbleThe scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.
Analysis of the radio tracking data from the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft at distances between 20–70 AU from the Sun has consistently indicated the presence of a small but anomalous Doppler frequency drift. The drift can be interpreted as due to a constant acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10−10 m/s2 directed towards the Sun. Although it is suspected that there is a systematic origin to the effect, none has been found. As a result, there is growing interest in the nature of this anomaly.
This link from JukriS is an article about stuff that can not be within the known universe. Observation of speeds place a great attractor well outside the known bounds.Quote from: JukriS linkInflationary bubbleThe scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.
Cosmic string in the cracks between domains. Millions of light years long and denser than a neutron star.
No, it's a totally different beastie.
I'm still trying to figure how strings can be semi-local. The edit box won't even accept it without the dash 
Some of the animations are interesting. The best 1 is to scroll down to where it says "The full simulation volume (t = 20 - 2000, isosurface = 1/2) " and click on the link.
Quote from: DoctorBeaverSome of the animations are interesting. The best 1 is to scroll down to where it says "The full simulation volume (t = 20 - 2000, isosurface = 1/2) " and click on the link.Yes; very interesting; I had not encountered the notion of local strings before.
Neutriinos explode and radiate energy waves
Quasars have been observed in born at the same time as the space began to expand an accelerating pace! It is thus seen how the energy started to become less high-density energy an accelerating pace, but still thought-state expansion and began to expand an accelerating rate? and this theory is based on the observation obtained from particles that have energy! The particles themselves are not changed over the entire period of less energy, high-density, when light stretches of red moves in general!
QuoteNeutriinos explode and radiate energy wavesWhat!? Where did you get that idea from?
Space began to expand with an accelerating rate of 8 billion years ago? When the universe was 6 billion years old?
I was referring to exploding neutrinos emitting energy. I have never heard of them exploding and I do not see how they can as they are fundamental. What do they explode into? They have no constituents.
Vern - I agree they're slippery little buggers.
QuoteSpace began to expand with an accelerating rate of 8 billion years ago? When the universe was 6 billion years old?Where did you get that idea from? Space has been expanding since the moment of the Big Bang. If it hadn't expanded prior to 8 billion years ago, how did quasars form 11 billion years ago?
Where did you get that idea from? Space has never been expanding.
You cant see, heard, taste, smell or feel space and you BELIEVE, that space expanding!Are you some religious or what!Where did you get that idea from? Particle dont radiate energy?
Looks like I'll have to go back and learn Year 11 physics/astronomy again. 
So if what you say is true...What do you mean exactly by 'energy changing'?
Is this your own theory?