The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Cells, Microbes & Viruses
  4. Multi-purpose DNA ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Multi-purpose DNA ?

  • 1 Replies
  • 4052 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chimera (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 475
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Multi-purpose DNA ?
« on: 28/05/2005 11:15:21 »
One of the paradigms of modern biology is that DNA and RNA are the code of life, popularly put.

This would seem to indicate that an important function of general coding is maintained, namely that one code produces one result. Always nice if you know what to expect.

Now I read this article about how eyes form, and a little tidbit of information caught my eye, and since it was not the major issue of the article, it was not embarked upon in great detail, but my attention was piqued:

it seems there is a protein in the eye of a duck, that is a kind of opaque glittery affair, with some clear-cut function. That is not it's salient property to me, though, but more the fact that the piece of DNA in the ducks' liver I believe, that creates that protein, already was known to create an altogether entirely different protein, which undoubtedly has some interesting function elsewhere, but that is not the point: how can the system decide when it should do what if DNA/RNA contains all code?

Errrm... are people aware of this phenomenon in other places? What could be the mechanism? Does this have any other consequences we should be aware of?

(Haven't got the article at hand, unfortunately, but if people have any doubts as to the story, I'll go digging...)
Logged
Errare humanum esd.-- Biggus D.
 



Offline anthony

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 65
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Multi-purpose DNA ?
« Reply #1 on: 25/06/2005 05:04:49 »
After the sequencing of the human genome it was determined there were 30,000 human genes. This is far smaller than the size of the human "proteome" - ie the library of proteins/enzymes in the human species. Probably each gene codes for 10 proteins, so 300,000 proteins is a good guess. The human genome was easy to sequence, and the technology was readily available, however, this is not the case for the proteome at the moment. Genes cover only a tiny proportion of DNA in the cell, about 5%, genes are easily recognised by their "START HERE" and "STOP HERE" instructions in the code. The rest of the DNA isn't so easily understood and has many functions and has the historical title of "junk DNA".

So there are 30,000 genes, 300,000 proteins and around 2^300,000 possible interactions between proteins, this is where the true complexity of biology lies, not in DNA. It's rather like the game of "Go" with those white and black counters arrnaged on a grid. The instructions for play are incredibly simple, however play is incredibly complex, determining the games popularity in maths departments worldwide.

To answer your question once a protein is copied from the code it then interacts with other proteins and can be modified. Either shortened, tacked onto another protein, covered in sugars, given a metal ion, loosing a metal ion, coated in lipids, whatever. All this through interaction with other proteins. A cell knows what type of cell it is through the balance of proteins within it and it maintains it's condition once it's set, and this will determine what genes are read within the cell and what happens to the proteins that are read from them.

So it's true DNA is the code of life, but it cannot control each object it encodes, each object is freely interacting with everything else about it, and as I desribed earlier this makes biology incredibly complex. Much more complex than physics.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

What is the blockchain and what purpose does blockchain serve?

Started by scientizschtBoard General Science

Replies: 2
Views: 1171
Last post 30/07/2018 10:57:58
by Ophiolite
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

Started by bhaahBoard General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 1255
Last post 07/12/2018 18:03:15
by bhaah
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

Started by lodhaGBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 4
Views: 1143
Last post 01/04/2019 22:21:22
by Colin2B
What purpose do thorns serve on berry bushes and roses other then protection?

Started by Karen W.Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 35
Views: 30713
Last post 09/04/2009 13:08:52
by dentstudent
Do colours, flavours, and aromas serve any nutritional purpose?

Started by Atomic-SBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 9
Views: 4608
Last post 30/05/2019 19:04:23
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.093 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.