0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

It is an interesting idea. Sometimes I think we have become too quantum concious so that we try to describe everything in terms of quanta. This leads us to Planck time, Planck length, a graviton, etc. But I think the only experimental evidence for the quantum nature of the universe relates to the photon. We know that it is quantized.Now, what could cause the photon to only exist in packets the size of a quantum? Maybe it is simply that electromagnetic waves propagate as saturated points of electric and magnetic amplitude. I explored this notion in a little more depth in a paper ...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please REGISTER or LOGIN

If we allow a quantum of energy to consist of a single wavelength, then it must possess a saturation constant. We use E = hv to describe a quantum of energy-time. Electric and magnetic amplitude are not part of the equation, therefore electric and magnetic amplitude must be constant. Otherwise, h would be a variable....sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please REGISTER or LOGIN proposes a saturation constant and manipulates Maxwell's equations to derive it. Then he proposes the addition of this constant to Maxwell's equations so that they then predict quantum phenomena.

I'm not sure how vernon did his ''message'' to my link and posted it here in this forum to another link, but until i find that out, this derivation that links the Planck Time easily with the Planck Charge in pure latex (easier on the eyes kind of thingy) , so here is the link to the derivation:...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please REGISTER or LOGINFrom this, i have wondered whether anyone here has figured i've been slowly progressing to an idea that the gravitational planck charge is not continuous, but rather fleeting flashes of gravitational charge, as the Planck Charge at a quantized level (must in my own logic) equal or be defined by the existence in a single chronon, also known as the Planck Time.One this derivation has had more consideration for any possible mathematical errors, (if it has any), then i will then decide to produce these charges to be the very essence of what causes a photon as a fluctuation or knot in spacetime to produce some kind of inertial flux. It's like having a photon trying to move through too much ''thickness'' in spacetime. As a thought experiment, we could have two universes in mind. If one universe exhibits the lightspeed as ''c'' as we normally recognize it, and the other universe with a density in the vacuum slightly higher, then wouldn't the photon energy in contrast rather be a ''more restfull'' object than the one which detects the normal value of c? It seems that if there is some kind of added energy (given recently in my derivation of a lower photon-energy expectancy value)then it could make the fluctuation of the electromagnetic field flutter so-to-say within the field, and experience for the first time, time itself, and moving through a real space as well! The gravitational charge then exists for only planck time, whilst the gravitational bodies of large objects that we observe, have constituents which all lead to the same constant of mass.

The electromagnetic saturation constant is the amount of energy available in a given period of time per quantum of electromotive force in a given wavelength.If this is true, then it is most acceptable to believe my plankian derivations that closely relate the nature of the Planck Time and Charge, would mean that their properties to ''flux'' photon energy into matter must also be proportional to the amount of time in the Saturation Constant. This would mean that not only does all ''gravitationally-charged'' matter has a matter in short fleeting flashes of stops and starts at a Planck Time, but the Charge and Saturation of the energy must equivalently equal to the Planck Time .

Quote from: Mr. ScientistThe electromagnetic saturation constant is the amount of energy available in a given period of time per quantum of electromotive force in a given wavelength.If this is true, then it is most acceptable to believe my plankian derivations that closely relate the nature of the Planck Time and Charge, would mean that their properties to ''flux'' photon energy into matter must also be proportional to the amount of time in the Saturation Constant. This would mean that not only does all ''gravitationally-charged'' matter has a matter in short fleeting flashes of stops and starts at a Planck Time, but the Charge and Saturation of the energy must equivalently equal to the Planck Time .Yes; I can see the possibility.

Done; I'm a little slow in the standard notation of maths. All of my experience with arithmetic is in computer programming, mostly C++. I like to understand things by graphical visualization, I guess because of my graphics programming experience.

"If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter-like states and electrodynamics phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted."

And what if aliens showed up and we were talking about science, which we totally would cause we would HAVE to compare ways of doing math and counting and senses and all that, and we told them about the Planck length, and they were all "lolwut? that's arbitrary"?Then what would you say to that? Seriously. Picture yourself for some reason being part of the group of people doing the communicating with the alien's group of people doing their communicating, and that comes up, and they refute this idea. What would your justification be for saying that the shortest amount of time can only go up to 43 decimal places (hope I counted that right)?TL;DR version: assigning inherently arbitrary values that we invented to natural forces is lolworthy