The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?

  • 26 Replies
  • 17860 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roger Röhrig

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
« on: 13/05/2009 10:30:02 »
Roger Röhrig asked the Naked Scientists:
   
With the mission to repair the Hubble telescope finally under way, I was wondering if this incredible instrument would react to things closer at home.

Would it be able to spot the footprints left by the astronauts on the moon or can't it focus that closer or would its optic be scorched by the intense
light?

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 15/05/2009 09:27:07 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5064
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 64 times
    • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #1 on: 13/05/2009 12:54:24 »
      "Hubble's keen vision (0.085 arc seconds.)"
    This equates to 500 feet at 250,000 miles,quite inadequate for viewing footprints.

    See http://www.telescope-optics.net/telescope_resolution.htm
     
    « Last Edit: 15/05/2009 09:57:16 by syhprum »
    Logged
    syhprum
     

    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #2 on: 13/05/2009 14:30:59 »
    The Chandrayaan-1 lunar orbiter is, apparently, able to resolve objects of 5 to 10m. Fine enough to see a landing site but no footprints.
    Logged
     

    Offline Vern

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2072
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
      • Photonics
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #3 on: 14/05/2009 15:39:06 »
    Quote from: syhprum on 13/05/2009 12:54:24
      "Hubble's keen vision (0.085 arc seconds.)"
    This equates to 500 feet at 250,000 miles,quite inadequate for viewing footprints.
     
    Very interesting information! I was just watching a news report about the space Shuttle repair attempt for Hubble. It is supposed to improve its image resolution a hundred fold. I wonder what will be the new fine field resolution?
    Logged
     

    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #4 on: 14/05/2009 15:41:45 »
    Quote from: Vern on 14/05/2009 15:39:06
    Quote from: syhprum on 13/05/2009 12:54:24
      "Hubble's keen vision (0.085 arc seconds.)"
    This equates to 500 feet at 250,000 miles,quite inadequate for viewing footprints.
     
    Very interesting information! I was just watching a news report about the space Shuttle repair attempt for Hubble. It is supposed to improve its image resolution a hundred fold. I wonder what will be the new fine field resolution?

    Probably one tenth of an olympic sized swimming pool, almost everthing these days seems to be compared to this new? OSSP measurement - I've heard it used twice today on two seperate news items.
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     



    Offline Vern

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2072
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
      • Photonics
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #5 on: 14/05/2009 15:56:18 »
    But this OSSP unit requires another component to be meaningful. It needs to be OSSP per some distance value. [:)]
    Logged
     

    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #6 on: 14/05/2009 17:13:20 »
    1 OSSP Per 26 miles 385 yards to keep with the same system [;D]
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     

    Offline syhprum

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 5064
    • Activity:
      8.5%
    • Thanked: 64 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #7 on: 14/05/2009 18:50:57 »
    There is no hope that Hubble's resolution could be increased a hundredfold, assuming everything is made perfectly the resolution is determined by the size of the mirror and the frequency of the light it is operating at, Hubble is already at that limit.
    Logged
    syhprum
     

    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #8 on: 14/05/2009 20:00:48 »
    Quote from: Fortran on 14/05/2009 17:13:20
    1 OSSP Per 26 miles 385 yards to keep with the same system [;D]
    So that's an Olympic Size Galaxy, quite a long way away?
    Logged
     



    Offline Vern

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2072
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
      • Photonics
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #9 on: 14/05/2009 22:32:13 »
    Quote from: syhprum on 14/05/2009 18:50:57
    There is no hope that Hubble's resolution could be increased a hundredfold, assuming everything is made perfectly the resolution is determined by the size of the mirror and the frequency of the light it is operating at, Hubble is already at that limit.
    It seems I remember that the CCD's of the early Hubble had a resolution of 800 by 800 pixels. They must do some tricks with those because the images we see are much more detailed.

    I'm not sure what the news cast was claiming was a hundred times better. What ever tricks they use to capture images have probably improved over the last 20 years or so.
    Logged
     

    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #10 on: 14/05/2009 22:41:14 »
    Quote from: Vern on 14/05/2009 22:32:13
    Quote from: syhprum on 14/05/2009 18:50:57
    There is no hope that Hubble's resolution could be increased a hundredfold, assuming everything is made perfectly the resolution is determined by the size of the mirror and the frequency of the light it is operating at, Hubble is already at that limit.
    It seems I remember that the CCD's of the early Hubble had a resolution of 800 by 800 pixels. They must do some tricks with those because the images we see are much more detailed.

    I'm not sure what the news cast was claiming was a hundred times better. What ever tricks they use to capture images have probably improved over the last 20 years or so.

    I'm sure I remember reading that there was some redundancy in the hubble in terms of the 800 x 600 ie 0.48 megapixel - it was known that camera technology would improve thus the resolution was much smaller than a single pixel, by how
    much I do not know but also remember a lot of the processing is done on board
    and improvements in software algorhythms will also improve 'effective resolution'  I think I read about it in Scientific American at some point.
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     

    Offline chris

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 7936
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 272 times
    • The Naked Scientist
      • View Profile
      • The Naked Scientists
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #11 on: 14/05/2009 22:56:44 »
    I am not sure I understand "500 feet at 250,000 miles" and why this is okay for seeing footprints.

    Does this mean that it can spot something 500 feet across at a distance of 250,000 miles?

    How far is Hubble from the moon?

    Chris
    Logged
    I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
     

    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #12 on: 14/05/2009 23:40:26 »
    Quote from: chris on 14/05/2009 22:56:44
    I am not sure I understand "500 feet at 250,000 miles" and why this is okay for seeing footprints.

    Does this mean that it can spot something 500 feet across at a distance of 250,000 miles?

    How far is Hubble from the moon?

    Chris

    Hubble is about 242,648 miles from the moon which others (being less pedantic than I) have rounded up to 250K Miles. I think the 500 feet is either the smallest object hubble can 'see' at that distance or it is the field width of the image (ie like a picture of an object 500 feet across) in which case the smallest object would be around 12 inches, to resolve a footprint you would probably need a resolution better than 1 pixel per centimetre.


    Edit: Here's a piece from Nasa on that very subject

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/11jul_lroc.htm
    « Last Edit: 14/05/2009 23:45:34 by Fortran »
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     



    lyner

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #13 on: 15/05/2009 00:36:53 »
    Once the Lunar reconaissance orbiter is in place the conspiracy theorists will need to step everything up a notch. But will they admit they were wrong? No, it will just involve a further layer of conspiracy.
    I imagine that there was a team of set builders sent a few years ago to construct fake landing sites.
    Logged
     

    Offline syhprum

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 5064
    • Activity:
      8.5%
    • Thanked: 64 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #14 on: 15/05/2009 07:21:35 »
    The Mars orbiter,s have been able to identify the rover landing sites.
    Logged
    syhprum
     

    Offline chris

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 7936
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 272 times
    • The Naked Scientist
      • View Profile
      • The Naked Scientists
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #15 on: 15/05/2009 09:15:32 »
    So the field of view is 500 feet - will a footprint 1/500th the size of that field be visible? Isn't that asking a lot? Isn't that like looking at a photo of a family holiday on the beach and then being able to see a single grain of sand in one corner of the photo? Sounds like a tall order to me.

    Chris
    Logged
    I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
     

    Offline chris

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 7936
    • Activity:
      4%
    • Thanked: 272 times
    • The Naked Scientist
      • View Profile
      • The Naked Scientists
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #16 on: 15/05/2009 09:21:09 »
    I just read the NASA link posted by Fortran. As I suspected it says:

    "There are six landing sites scattered across the Moon. They always face Earth, always in plain view. Surely the Hubble Space Telescope could photograph the rovers and other things astronauts left behind. Right?

    Wrong. Not even Hubble can do it. The Moon is 384,400 km away. At that distance, the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about 60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image."

    So it looks like a footprint is indeed beyond the scope of Hubble's resolving power.

    Chris
    Logged
    I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
     



    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #17 on: 15/05/2009 12:54:14 »
    Quote from: chris on 15/05/2009 09:21:09
    I just read the NASA link posted by Fortran. As I suspected it says:

    "There are six landing sites scattered across the Moon. They always face Earth, always in plain view. Surely the Hubble Space Telescope could photograph the rovers and other things astronauts left behind. Right?

    Wrong. Not even Hubble can do it. The Moon is 384,400 km away. At that distance, the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about 60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image."

    So it looks like a footprint is indeed beyond the scope of Hubble's resolving power.

    Chris

    If it were possible for Hubble to photograph a footprint on the moon I'm not sure conspiracy theorists will take the word of NASA that any picture was genuine, they could suggest the pictures are 'doctored'.  The principle conspiricists have a living to make.  It is impossible to prove who made a print on the moon and when, it is up to each person to decide for themselves whether or not they believe NASA,  I once published an article which rebutted the conspiricists and since none of them could prove me wrong, it is clear the landings happened!
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     

    Offline Roger Röhrig

    • First timers
    • *
    • 3
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #18 on: 15/05/2009 18:34:13 »
    Hello all, great replies so far for the resolution question,
    especially the NASA link puts things into perspective.
    But what about the brightness aspect?
    I'm pretty convinced Hubble's CCD would burn up if the telescope
    would be pointed directly at the Sun, but what about the Moon (or the Earth)?
    Would it suffer any damage?
    Would the CCD be overloaded and produce a completely white picture?

    Roger

    Logged
     

    Offline Fortran

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • 91
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could the Hubble telescope see astronaut footprints?
    « Reply #19 on: 15/05/2009 18:43:59 »
    Quote from: Roger Röhrig on 15/05/2009 18:34:13
    Hello all, great replies so far for the resolution question,
    especially the NASA link puts things into perspective.
    But what about the brightness aspect?
    I'm pretty convinced Hubble's CCD would burn up if the telescope
    would be pointed directly at the Sun, but what about the Moon (or the Earth)?
    Would it suffer any damage?
    Would the CCD be overloaded and produce a completely white picture?

    Roger


    I'd be very surprised if there were no filters, shutters built in, even a system to close the telescope hen being maintained or possibly redirected past the sun.

    As for the moon no, my understanding is that that there is almost no heat reflected just visible light so although the CCD may be saturated it is unlikely to be damaged.

    Not sure how much light hits us from the moon but I'll bet it's less than 1 watt/square metre.
    THats from the whole moon, now consider how much light hits the earth from a a tiny square of that
    probably only a few nanowatts, (to lazy to do the sums) THe moon only looks bright beacuse of the dark background,during the day it's no brighter than sunlit cloud.

    EDIT: Moonlight at earth's surface approx  1mW/M2 (1 thousandth of a watt per square meter).
    THus the total light from the moon entering Hubble would be around 4.5mW  (enough power to
    light a low power LED. (Hubble Mirror 2.4 Metres Radius. Nothing like enough to harm even the most sensitive CCD camera.
    « Last Edit: 15/05/2009 18:59:17 by Fortran »
    Logged
    You are only smart if you are surrounded by fools, so have a bit more patience for those of us that are complete idiots!

    I like this place, if they don't ban me I'll stay here.
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    Would an array of digital camera sensors be cheaper than a large telescope?

    Started by Wes BullockBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 5
    Views: 4166
    Last post 21/10/2010 16:35:12
    by imatfaal
    What colour should the James Webb Space Telescope sunshield be painted?

    Started by CliffordKBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 1
    Views: 2927
    Last post 04/02/2012 01:56:28
    by wolfekeeper
    How will the TESS space telescope find nearby Earth-like planets?

    Started by alfa015Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 1
    Views: 1166
    Last post 15/04/2018 22:03:01
    by chris
    Have you seen NASA's World Wide Telescope (free download) ?

    Started by neilepBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 7
    Views: 8764
    Last post 28/09/2010 20:10:59
    by LeeE
    What image resolution will the James Webb telescope capture?

    Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 2
    Views: 4604
    Last post 06/09/2011 17:03:10
    by imatfaal
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.163 seconds with 80 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.