0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You could then show data that suggests the higher the differential temperature between you and your environment the more calories you burn, if this is true then it adds weight to the hypothesis, when and only when there is NO contradictory data to your hypothesis can you begin to suggest it is a theory.
With regard to Vern's statement that 'a single piece of evidence to the contrary kills' I question this. Current flow is widely considered to be the result of a 'flow of electrons'. This contradicts Pauli's exclusion principle as electrons are leptons and therefore not able to 'share a path'. But the concept holds through the most extraordinary logical and natural contradictions.
If you'd care to tell us the quantum numbers involved with electrons moving through a wife
Let me know what you think. Obviously I assume that you too, entirely doubt the validity - which is entirely understandable. And no, it does not require motors - and nor do I claim 'perpetual motion'. Just a new take on current flow and magnetic fields generally.
It's a simple switching circuit -not at all difficult to duplicate. But having posted it - will I then be precluded from getting the paper reviewed in the normal way? is all.
OK - that's what Chris recommended. I'll ask him to post it as I have no idea how to do the circuit diagram and sundry charts. Possibly needs a new subject? Whatever. Will you duplicate it once posted? I'd like that. It also has an over view of my own take on current flow. I'll write to him tonight. Bit scared actually. I'm braced for a howl of protest. But that's good - provided it's replicated and disproved.
Anyway post you work and let us rip it apart. The sad thing is that we all think we have great ideas but most do not work that well.