The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light

  • 6 Replies
  • 3693 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jimijimi81 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« on: 18/07/2009 19:28:23 »
what would happen if u had a MASSIVE rod of unbreakable material, like many light years long.    and then say u swung it like a bat ,, and u where superman (or goku) so ya could.

SURLEY the end of the rod would travel MUCH fatser than the speed O'light yeh? breakin that E=MC2 law.

Jimi
« Last Edit: 18/07/2009 19:55:18 by jimijimi81 »
Logged
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3384
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #1 on: 18/07/2009 19:59:46 »
Long rods are never rigid or unbreakable they bend and break. All solids are extrememly soft and weak when it comes to the sort of forces involved inlarge scale ideas like that.  As you sweep the light of a torch round the room (or up into the sky the beam bends so the light stays at the same speed
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline jimijimi81 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #2 on: 18/07/2009 20:08:25 »
hang on,,  ill be a bit more specific...  theorecticly,, if one obtained or created a material with enourmous tensial streanth and ragitity.. enough to withstand the forces involved...   then go into outer space,, and swung this rod aorund in a circle... the end of the rod many many light years away will travel at tremndous speed. the end of rod which u are holding would have only of traveled a metre of two... but the other end, the galaxies away would have taken the same time to go in full circle BUT the distance it has traveled would be MENTAL....

if not a rod then a HUGE galaxy sized disc,,
Logged
 

Offline exton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #3 on: 18/07/2009 23:09:11 »
At size scales of the kind that you have in mind, *all* materials are sort of "springy". If you take a rod whose length is the same as the diameter of the galaxy, and you try to whip it around, what will happen is that it will bend; there's no such thing as a perfectly rigid material. In fact, with the size scales you're thinking of, swinging a rod - even a really rigid one - is a lot more like swinging a string.

Instead of thinking of physical objects as being solid and continuous, think of them in terms of the atoms that they're made of. When you push an object, you push the atoms that your hand comes into contact with, and those atoms push the ones near them, who then push the ones near them, and so on. In that sense, force takes time to transmit through a material; you can't swing a rod at one end and have the other end respond immediately. The rod will always bend, and on a cosmic length scale, it'll bend at least as much as is necessary in order for no part of it  to ever move faster than the speed of light.
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3384
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #4 on: 18/07/2009 23:28:36 »
A rod of any material of any thicknes a few thousand miles (let alone millions or light years) long would rapidly collapse under its own self gravitation into a blob.

You seem to be completely unaware of the real world scale of things strengths and forces.  The question is totally irrational
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline exton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #5 on: 19/07/2009 02:22:26 »
I think it's a perfectly reasonable question; it only seems irrational if you already know the answer.

If gravity is that important to your sensibilities, you could think of a similar, but functionally equivilant, question - what if you had a really giant sphere, and had sufficient force to shove it really hard into something else. When it collides with that something else, is the signal of you shoving it traveling faster than the speed of light?

The same misconception is still at work - forces don't travel instantaneously through materials. In every day life, when you wave around a rod, or push a sphere, or anything else, the entire object appears to move all at once. But that's not what actually happens, and the difference is only obvious when you consider things that you don't worry about every day - like galaxy-spanning rods (or galaxy-spanning spheres, if you like).
Logged
 

Offline jimijimi81 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
SUPERMASSIVE ROD faster than the speed of light
« Reply #6 on: 20/07/2009 04:30:25 »
thanks mate
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

If we put a mirror millions of light years away and reflected earth, could we see what earth looked like millions of years ago?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 9
Views: 11520
Last post 20/05/2018 00:53:37
by raf21
What is "light" pressure?

Started by sorincosofretBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 34
Views: 27677
Last post 13/02/2018 19:46:54
by Bill S
What is a halogen light bulb? What halogen is used and why is this better?

Started by chrisBoard Technology

Replies: 4
Views: 9476
Last post 02/02/2010 11:17:45
by Mazurka
Is solar energy the same as light energy?

Started by FeliciaBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 19724
Last post 19/03/2020 15:17:27
by Paul25
What is Time? If there was no light would Time cease to be?

Started by londounkmBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 291
Views: 99968
Last post 27/06/2020 13:55:35
by Bill S
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.161 seconds with 51 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.