True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..

  • 1 Replies

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline Pure Neutronium

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
    • View Profile
Of exploring and colonizing the solar system.  All other current or proposed propulsion systems are simply incapable of the speed or cargo capacity needed. 


Offline LeeE

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3382
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..
« Reply #1 on: 09/08/2009 12:23:10 »
With reasonable economy and within a reasonable time-frame, probably yes.  With the STS (Shuttle) you're bringing a lot back down each time you send it up, which means that of the total amount of energy used to get the STS and its payload up into orbit, relatively less of it is spent on lofting the payload and relatively more on just lofting the launch vehicle, which then has to come back down again.

With simpler disposable rockets, you don't have the overhead of ensuring that the disposable parts are capable of surviving re-entry and being recoverable, or if they are, the equipment needed to survive re-entry and recovery can be simpler, meaning that they can be less heavily engineered and lighter, which means that for any given amount of launch energy, more of it is available for payload rather than launch vehicle.
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!