The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..

  • 1 Replies
  • 2925 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pure Neutronium (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..
« on: 09/08/2009 10:06:07 »
Of exploring and colonizing the solar system.  All other current or proposed propulsion systems are simply incapable of the speed or cargo capacity needed. 
Logged
 



Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
True or false: Project Orion was our only real hope..
« Reply #1 on: 09/08/2009 12:23:10 »
With reasonable economy and within a reasonable time-frame, probably yes.  With the STS (Shuttle) you're bringing a lot back down each time you send it up, which means that of the total amount of energy used to get the STS and its payload up into orbit, relatively less of it is spent on lofting the payload and relatively more on just lofting the launch vehicle, which then has to come back down again.

With simpler disposable rockets, you don't have the overhead of ensuring that the disposable parts are capable of surviving re-entry and being recoverable, or if they are, the equipment needed to survive re-entry and recovery can be simpler, meaning that they can be less heavily engineered and lighter, which means that for any given amount of launch energy, more of it is available for payload rather than launch vehicle.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is the number 0 the real number 1?

Started by brett siniardBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 28
Views: 6520
Last post 19/02/2018 15:17:20
by Colin2B
Is White Chocolate real Chocolate?

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 19
Views: 8649
Last post 12/02/2021 12:35:10
by searchingscience
Is White Choccy real choccy ?

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 9
Views: 7563
Last post 16/04/2008 09:04:10
by DoctorBeaver
Is fake laughter different to real laughter?

Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 2
Views: 3947
Last post 17/01/2021 20:37:24
by LaurenaS
Is this fools gold or real gold?

Started by SweetcBoard Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

Replies: 8
Views: 4506
Last post 22/05/2018 21:31:11
by Bass
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.102 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.