The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?

  • 9 Replies
  • 7275 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JOHN Gamel

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
« on: 28/09/2009 16:30:03 »
JOHN Gamel  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Chris,

Just got back from my workout here in Budapest, and - as usual - I listened to your old newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/ [nonactive] the whole time. KEEP UP THE FABULOUS WORK. As I was sweating away, two thoughts came to me that might be of interest to you.

Perhaps you can tell me the fatal flaw in this idea for a perpetual motion machine?

Consider an air-filled cylinder that is closed at one end and contains at the other end a very, very heavy and smooth-fitting cylinder. Now, when you immerse this cylinder in water with the piston end up, the weight of the piston will compress the air, reducing its buoyancy in water. Then, when you turn the cylinder over so the piston end is down, its weight will "pull" on the air, increasing its buoyancy. Finally, mount several of these cylinders on a chain and mount the chain on two sprockets so that as those on one side rise, those on the on the other side descend, while at the top and bottom each cylinder will be rotated 180 degrees.

If this apparatus is immersed in water, why won't the greater buoyancy of the cylinders whose pistons are pointed down cause the chain to turn, thereby generating a perpetual motion machine?

I eagerly await your answer, since this has been puzzling me since my college days.

John Gamel

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5066
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 64 times
    • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #1 on: 28/09/2009 17:08:46 »
    Mechanical perpetual motion machines that depend moving balance points, turning things over etc always fail because the power adsorbed by these operations always exceeds the power generated.
    Logged
    syhprum
     

    Online Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 21339
    • Activity:
      100%
    • Thanked: 486 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #2 on: 28/09/2009 18:25:39 »
    Friction in the cylinders, viscosity of the gases and of the water.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    Offline Turveyd

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • 25
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #3 on: 28/09/2009 23:37:16 »
    It will slow down and stop eventually likely on it's side.


    It's simply not possible to do.

    Logged
     

    Offline Geezer

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8314
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 7 times
    • "Vive la résistance!"
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #4 on: 29/09/2009 00:34:53 »
    I'm confident this will work and I will be happy to help you secure a patent for this wonderful invention. My fees are very reasonable.

    To retain my services in this matter, please send a large suitcase stuffed with used pound five pound notes to:

    Honest Geezer, Attorney at Law.
    C/O HMPS Pentonville

    « Last Edit: 29/09/2009 01:30:27 by Geezer »
    Logged
    There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
     



    Offline John Gamel

    • First timers
    • *
    • 2
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #5 on: 30/09/2009 10:08:30 »
    I understand that friction of the piston and resistance of the water will tend to slow the machine down, but the fundamental question is this:

    Will the cylinder be more buoyant when the heavy piston is pointed down than when it is pointed up?

     If the answer is yes, then (in theory at least) such resistance can be overcome by making the cylinders larger or the pistons heavier.

    Problem is, I don't know how to calculate buoyancy in this setting. Any engineers out there want to give it a try?

    John Gamel
    Logged
     

    Offline Vern

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2072
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
      • Photonics
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #6 on: 30/09/2009 13:56:46 »
    Quote from: John Gamel
    Will the cylinder be more buoyant when the heavy piston is pointed down than when it is pointed up?
    Yes; it will be more buoyant, however, work will be required to reverse the piston. If we disregard all losses, the amount of work required to reverse the piston will exactly equal the amount of work you might get when the piston is pointed down.
    Logged
     

    Offline Geezer

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 8314
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 7 times
    • "Vive la résistance!"
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #7 on: 30/09/2009 19:57:01 »
    Dearest Mr Gamel,

    Pay no attention to these "scientists". They are only trying to steal your brilliant invention.

    I am offering a special Halloween discount during October. You will be able to retain my services for a mere suitcase stuffed with used US dollar bills. This is a one time offer that I am sure you will not want to miss.

    My associate, Mr Neil, will be happy to conduct the transaction on my behalf at Finsbury Park station. My associate should not be difficult to identify. He will be the rather sheepish individual hanging around on the platform.

    Very humbly,

    H. Geezer
    « Last Edit: 30/09/2009 20:28:27 by Geezer »
    Logged
    There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
     

    Offline neilep

    • Withdrawnmist
    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • ********
    • 20783
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 51 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #8 on: 30/09/2009 20:48:50 »
    From the desk of sheepy

    Pursuant to the above post and direction from H Geezer Attorney At Law.
    Sheepy has asked me to extend his congratulations and invites ewe to meet him at the above locale at 2am. He will be the one wearing............well...he'll be the sheep eating some chips and not looking dodgy at all in his mackintosh and sun glasses reading the Financial Times !

    Mr Sheepy invites your attendance and looks forward to conning doing business with ewe.


    Secretary to above sheepy.




    Logged
    Men are the same as women, just inside out !
     



    Offline The Craftsman

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • 10
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Why wouldn't this perpetual motion machine work?
    « Reply #9 on: 04/10/2009 16:32:27 »
    How about a perpetual fountain?  It's not a machine but it does display perpetual motion.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z6UJbwxBZI [nofollow]
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    What are "energy" and "work" ?

    Started by The ChampBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 108
    Views: 53760
    Last post 31/12/2018 20:54:40
    by yor_on
    What is a transistor? How does a transistor work?

    Started by chrisBoard Technology

    Replies: 9
    Views: 18396
    Last post 12/01/2010 01:48:55
    by Geezer
    Why do we have a jet stream, and how does the jet stream work?

    Started by Joe L. OganBoard The Environment

    Replies: 4
    Views: 8275
    Last post 03/06/2020 22:30:12
    by evan_au
    What are neutrinos and how do neutrinos work?

    Started by chrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 8
    Views: 10081
    Last post 08/01/2014 09:27:20
    by evan_au
    How do holograms work? How are holograms made?

    Started by JollyBoard Technology

    Replies: 11
    Views: 12467
    Last post 19/12/2015 00:42:04
    by Jolly
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.229 seconds with 63 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.