0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Obviously fusion isn't well understood
probably makes it hard to build a fusion reactor.
So much money is wasted on this GR crap
my patented idea for a method using fusion lasers that produces energy does nothing but make me poor
current physics is not real
pompous asses who steal money from you and give it to each other.
by you.The grown ups understand it well enough.
Please concisely without reffering to your extenisve studies explain the boat analogy being wrong, where and how.
yours is probably hard right wing hatred of music.
There is a lot of swearing in music
Alright bored chemist I'll be the adult here since we've gotten into a monkey sh1t throwing fight.Please concisely without reffering to your extenisve studies explain the boat analogy being wrong, where and how.By the way, I've read about quantum mechanics since string theory was introduced. If I wanted to I could make long answers like yours describing the photon an reitterating what someone else has said. You and I come from different circumstances I can tell, my background is more music then what yours is probably hard right wing hatred of music. There is a lot of swearing in music I'll give you that. Musicians like me are more bound to discuss space in an open manner where you only refer to things that you have studied without any innovation. If you want to discuss the matter more maybe talk about string theory and how it applies to what your talking about, crossing different ideas to come up with ne ones.
[You are] reitterating what someone else has said. You and I come from different circumstances I can tell, my background is more music
if all the matter in the galaxy was tied together by these GR ropes
if all the matter in the galaxy was tied together by these GR ropes and there is no frame of reference what keeps everything from pulling together into the middle? For example, lets say the earth is a truck, tugging on a rope(its gravitational pull) tied to a tree which is the wall of the universe. Without a frame of reference or a singular universe, the truck pulls on other objects, eventually tugiing them all into a big pile. Soon enough her comes other galaxies to join the pile. Yikes!
Since fusion is r'd by quantum mechanics and relativity I m going to make my own guess at it. When two hydrogen atoms collide with enough force to cause fusion they vibrate emitting a bright light sort of like a loud sound wave from a car crash.Obviously fusion isn't well understood which probably makes it hard to build a fusion reactor. This is a great shame for everyone and for me personally since my patented idea for a method using fusion lasers that produces energy does nothing but make me poor meanwhile the GR people are kissing each other's butts and handing out 3/4 a million dollars to some schmuck for describing the postulate's of Einstein. So much money is wasted on this GR crap I can't stand it!Don't really care to hear from the pompous GR people on this website, just trying to warn any young feeble minds out there that current physics is not real and to stay away from what seems like an open door to the intelligent. It is actually a very close minded group of pompous asses who steal money from you and give it to each other. Repugnance!
The universal data tells us that positive charge prefers to attach to higher mass, compared to the negative charge.
preponderance of evidence, in terms of universal observation.
What we observe minimizes the free energy; proton and electron.
The sun, which induces fusion, does so due to the impact on gravity onto positively charged mass
Positive change and its special symbiosis connection to mass, makes positive charge naturally closer to General Relativity; GR.
It is easier to hit a fixed target compared to a moving target. In old school H-bombs they chemically react deuterium with lithium to form static salt crystals.
In continuous reactors, instead of single use pulse reactors; H-bomb, we need the same static strategy, but in a more robust and rugged form that can invoke some GR activation energy; pressure.
No, it does not."prefers to attach to" would mean "releases more energy when allowed to attach to" and the spectroscopy of hydrogen and antihydrogen sow that is not the case.There is no "Quote from: puppypower on Yesterday at 13:16:12preponderance of evidence, in terms of universal observation.about it.It's just that we happen to live in a universe made of matter.It's hypothetically possible that somewhere in a far away antimatter rich part of the universe a left handed version of PuppyPower is making exactly the opposite claim- based on identical data.
You seem to be putting "GR" into things at random in your post
the affects of mass and GR
of pressures or GR.
GR needs to dominate SR.
What you seem to forget was matter and anti-matter formed not too long after big bang, when pressure and the affects of mass and GR were extremely high. The lab results do not use the same conditions of pressures or GR.
Again, the preponderance of the universal data shows that positive charge is most often connected to the heavier mass to form the proton.
shows that positive charge is most often connected to the heavier mass to form the proton.
This extra time aspect is reflected in the increased frequency of matter and energy in the center of gravity, where reference time is slowest.
If we compare an electron and proton, the electron displays higher entropy
Reference time; t1 is slowest in the center of gravity, but the frequency of matter and energy becomes the fastest in the core; t2. These are two opposite time affects. SR does not have this extra time aspect; t2, or else space travel would be limited since matter would phase change at high speeds as vibrations increased due to t2. If we accelerated via a fast moving circle then t2 would appear as pressure.
The proton lowers mass potential via fusion, while electron lower potential via higher entropy as SR; faster orbital electrons.