The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?

  • 45 Replies
  • 22165 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jccc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 990
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #40 on: 07/03/2015 05:11:32 »
Quote from: illusion on 20/01/2013 18:37:21
Most certainly EM and gravitation are related. Both of them are distributed through the same space and obey inverse-square law. Even child can tell that they are somehow related  :D


But informatons... nah.. I'm more like a ether believer  8D

you are right on. gravity is em force. see http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=54194.0
Logged
 



Offline ernst39 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 36
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #41 on: 07/03/2015 17:03:42 »
Quote from: jccc on 07/03/2015 05:11:32
you are right on. gravity is em force

There is a formal analogy between the gravito-electromagnetic (GEM) description of gravitation and the mathematical description of the electromagnetic (EM) phenomena (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism [nofollow]).
In the article "Fundamentals of the Theory of Informatons" (reply #30) it is shown that this analogy perfectly can be explained by the hypothesis that any material object manifests its substantiality (its physical presence) by the emission - at a  rate proportional to its rest mass - of granular  mass and energy less entities rushing away with the speed of light and carrying information about the position, the velocity and the electrical status of their emitter.  Because they carry nothing but information we call this entities "informatons". 
In the frame of that hypothesis gravitational and electromagnetic fields are understood as the macroscopic manifestations of the attributes of the informatons,  and the laws of GEM and Maxwell can be deduced from the kinematics of the informatons.
« Last Edit: 07/03/2015 17:05:57 by ernst39 »
Logged
 

Offline ernst39 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 36
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #42 on: 19/05/2017 10:21:38 »
There is a new version of the article "Gravitoelectromagnetism explained by the theory of informatons" on Research Gate.  (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301891607_GRAVITO-ELECTROMAGNETISM_EXPLAINED_BY_THE_THEORY_OF_INFORMATONS-2 [nofollow])
Logged
 

Offline sandgroper

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #43 on: 03/06/2017 06:38:29 »
Quote from: ernst39 on 19/05/2017 10:21:38
There is a new version of the article "Gravitoelectromagnetism explained by the theory of informatons" on Research Gate. 

I know this is an old thread but...

Gravity is related to mass, space and time. This ought to be a no brainer. Gravity is an acceleration. Gravity is a relative disparity in time and space between two masses. There is no electo-magnetism involved in gravity. The compelling or motivating force in gravity is a effective time disparity created in space by two comparative masses occupying it. Time itself is a vector (or tensor if you prefer) property of mass whose direction points to the centre of mass. This is also a no brainer.

I dont understand why people labour over this. If you need it explained to you, read all about it here --> plus google com/collection/8a4JU
Logged
 

Offline ernst39 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 36
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #44 on: 03/06/2017 08:59:00 »
Quote from: sandgroper on 03/06/2017 06:38:29
There is no electo-magnetism involved in gravity

"Gravitomagnetism is a widely used term referring specifically to the kinetic effects of gravity, in analogy to the magnetic effects of moving electric charge."  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism [nofollow]). 

This doesn't mean that electromagnetism is involved in gravity!
Logged
 



Offline ernst39 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 36
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Are gravitation and electromagnetism related?
« Reply #45 on: 28/01/2018 18:04:46 »
On gravitoelectromagnetism

Gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM) is developed  in the context of classical physics (by O. Heaviside and others).   It widens the scope of Newtonian gravitation by taking into account the kinetics of the gravitating objects.  It is a classical field theory in whose context the “principle of equivalence” and the “principle of  relativity” are valid.

     1. The gravitational field  is set up by a given distribution of - whether or not moving - masses and it is - just like the electromagnetic field - defined by two three-dimensional  intertwined vector fields :  the “g-field”  Eg   and the “g-induction”  Bg . In the context of GEM  the gravitational field (Eg, Bg) is mathematically described by a set of four partial differential equations, the “GEM-equations” (or the “Maxwell-Heaviside equations”) that describe how  Eg    and Bg vary in space due to their sources - the masses and the mass flows - and how they are intertwined.  These equations are invariant under a Lorentztransformation.  The GEM equations nor their solutions indicate an existence of causal links between g-fields and g-induction fields. Therefore, we must conclude that a gravitational  field is a dual entity always having a g- and a b-component simultaneously created by their common sources: time-variable masses and mass flows.

     2. The gravitational field  (Eg, Bg) acts on a particle  in it.  This shows up in a force  FG   that that particle (with rest mass m0 and velocity v) experiences: FG = m0.[Eg  +  (v x Bg)].  This “force law of GEM” is analog to Lorentz force law.

The starting point of GEM differs fundamentally from the starting point of GRT, because space and time doesn't play an acitve role in the description by GEM of the gravitational phenomena and laws.  In the context of GEM,space and time are elements of the description of nature that do not participate in the physical processes.

It has been shown that certain concrete predictions made on the basis of the gravito-electromagnetic description of gravity are perfectly in line with the results of cosmological observations.


References:


1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328582899_The_Maxwell-Heaviside_equations
[nofollow]


2. Antoine Acke:  GRAVITATION EXPLAINED BY GRAVITOELECTROMAGNETISM. (ISBN/ 978-613-9-93065-4)

« Last Edit: 07/11/2018 19:15:19 by ernst39 »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 46 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.