Can we build a new Reality Theory?

  • 89 Replies
  • 21586 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« on: 17/11/2009 14:15:44 »
I have some ideas about what is the true nature of the universe. Others here have other notions. I wonder if we can start with a few postulates and create a new vision of reality. Can we find that principal that John Wheeler talked about when he said, "Some principle uniquely right and uniquely simple must, when one knows it, be also so obvious that it is clear that the universe is built, and must be built, in such and such a way and that it could not possibly be otherwise."

As a first postulate I suggest Maxwell's idea.

Postulate: The final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field.
« Last Edit: 11/12/2009 18:35:29 by Vern »

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #1 on: 17/11/2009 14:42:03 »
I have some ideas about what is the true nature of the universe. Others here have other notions. I wonder if we can start with a few postulates and create a new vision of reality. Can we find that principal that John Wheeler talked about when he said, "Some principle uniquely right and uniquely simple must, when one knows it, be also so obvious that it is clear that the universe is built, and must be built, in such and such a way and that it could not possibly be otherwise."

As a first postulate I suggest Maxwell's idea.

Postulate: The final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field.
I have a theory that can explain cause of Bang !

*

Offline Don_1

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6890
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • View Profile
    • Knight Light Haulage
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #2 on: 17/11/2009 14:51:46 »
I have some ideas about what is the true nature of the universe. Others here have other notions. I wonder if we can start with a few postulates and create a new vision of reality. Can we find that principal that John Wheeler talked about when he said, "Some principle uniquely right and uniquely simple must, when one knows it, be also so obvious that it is clear that the universe is built, and must be built, in such and such a way and that it could not possibly be otherwise."

As a first postulate I suggest Maxwell's idea.

Postulate: The final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field.
I have a theory that can explain cause of Bang !

So have I, Lino Lil at No. 18!!!
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #3 on: 17/11/2009 14:55:02 »
What do you mean Mr.don_1_2_page no.18 ??

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #4 on: 17/11/2009 14:58:40 »
R u making fun of me ?
When I will publish than I need to look at your face LOL.

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #5 on: 17/11/2009 15:10:42 »
Now boys; behave. Let's be diplmatic and reasnable within ourselves when considering each others theories.

:)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #6 on: 17/11/2009 15:13:33 »
Now boys; behave. Let's be diplmatic and reasnable within ourselves when considering each others theories.

:)
sir, why don't you use physics Journals to publish ??
http://journals.aip.org/

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #7 on: 17/11/2009 18:59:12 »
Let me attempt this on a logical path.

Vern and myself a photon-theory only enthusiasts. Many have been following luxon theory and how Verns vision incurs with mine very admirably, after all that complicated imaginary stuff to reconcile within my cranium.

He has shown that the irreducible singularity is an electromagnetic force. I agree.

He believe there is no Higgs Boson. I set it down to an energy gradient in the potential gravitational vector, whilst vern internally and forensically illustrates a geometry-occurrance within the structure of a photon.

Then i had to involve vortex's in my math as to ''compress'' all the essential ingredients together, so i was trying to answer verns qoutation ''it all happens by magic,'' but obviously not so :)

So let's debate this stuff first.

Myself and Vern are considering in writing a thesis between us on a new reality proposal, and a whole new ensemble of math to decribe it. By removing the gravitational singularity, many current quantum problems can inexorably be solved.

 [8D] 777th post. Two days ago i had 666 and freaked out a little. No girly screams though... [::)]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #8 on: 17/11/2009 19:51:06 »
Now boys; behave. Let's be diplmatic and reasnable within ourselves when considering each others theories.

:)
sir, why don't you use physics Journals to publish ??
http://journals.aip.org/

Simply down to money.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #9 on: 17/11/2009 19:53:19 »
By your theory vern magnetic charge inside a photon i effected by a curvature, or it dissipated until it follows a linear path again. The is a prediction well-worth noting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #10 on: 17/11/2009 19:58:14 »
May be we can begin with the one reality we have postulated. That only photons comprise the universe. We can see how far we can get with that notion and still remain self consistent.

Given the postulate, we might wonder why the electromagnetic field always presents itself in quantum chunks. I have proposed that it is because empty space can support only so much electric and magnetic amplitude. I suspect that is true because electric and magnetic amplitude is not part of the equation for quantum energy.

hv describes quantum energy. It contains only a constant and the rate of electromagnetic change over time. If the electric and magnetic amplitude reached during the change were variable it would need be in the equation.

Now, is that reasoning valid?
« Last Edit: 18/11/2009 03:46:39 by Vern »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #11 on: 17/11/2009 20:06:09 »
By your theory vern magnetic charge inside a photon i effected by a curvature, or it dissipated until it follows a linear path again. The is a prediction well-worth noting.

In the hypothetical universe under consideration nothing exists except electric and magnetic amplitude change. This change is equal and opposite in a photon, so a photon is charge neutral.

However when the path of a photon is bent, the electric and magnetic change can not be equal and opposite on both sides of the path. There is less area on the inside of the curve. This imbalance shows up as charge and mass.

When there is no entrapment mechanism to hold the bent path, the path straightens and continues on as a massless photon.
« Last Edit: 17/11/2009 20:11:10 by Vern »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #12 on: 18/11/2009 03:25:38 »
Quote
hv describes quantum energy. It contains only a constant and the rate of electromagnetic change over time. If the electric and magnetic amplitude reached during the change were variable it would need be in the equation.

Now, is that reasoning valid?


If that reasoning is valid, we immediately see that there are some obvious realities that have not yet been stated in physics. The numerical value of the electric and magnetic amplitude limit that empty space can sustain is one.  This number should be significant. It would be a primary constant from which Planck's constant derives. It would be the primary cause of the quantum nature of the universe. It would be the originating factor in the mental affliction we call Quantamania.(newly coined word) It should free us from the need to identify everything in terms of quanta.

« Last Edit: 18/11/2009 03:37:49 by Vern »

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #13 on: 18/11/2009 08:30:13 »
May be we can begin with the one reality we have postulated. That only photons comprise the universe. We can see how far we can get with that notion and still remain self consistent.

Given the postulate, we might wonder why the electromagnetic field always presents itself in quantum chunks. I have proposed that it is because empty space can support only so much electric and magnetic amplitude. I suspect that is true because electric and magnetic amplitude is not part of the equation for quantum energy.

hv describes quantum energy. It contains only a constant and the rate of electromagnetic change over time. If the electric and magnetic amplitude reached during the change were variable it would need be in the equation.

Now, is that reasoning valid?
Mm... deep. Too early in the morning. I will think about this hard though.

Thnks Vern
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #14 on: 18/11/2009 08:33:25 »
Quote
hv describes quantum energy. It contains only a constant and the rate of electromagnetic change over time. If the electric and magnetic amplitude reached during the change were variable it would need be in the equation.

Now, is that reasoning valid?


If that reasoning is valid, we immediately see that there are some obvious realities that have not yet been stated in physics. The numerical value of the electric and magnetic amplitude limit that empty space can sustain is one.  This number should be significant. It would be a primary constant from which Planck's constant derives. It would be the primary cause of the quantum nature of the universe. It would be the originating factor in the mental affliction we call Quantamania.(newly coined word) It should free us from the need to identify everything in terms of quanta.



my thoughts ineditely after reading the post above
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Dimi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 112
  • Prone to rambling
    • View Profile
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #15 on: 18/11/2009 08:52:06 »
Let me start by saying,

Perhaps there was no such thing as big-bang, that life itself existed FOREVER, we are applying Human concepts that something MUST start from somewhere, by implying it starts - gives it an implication it must end, life starts and ends. But the universe never started, it was just THERE to begin with (Or rather to not-begin with...), perhaps the earth was made via big-bang, but not the universe. Could be just a giant contradiction :)

Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth?

This being said, reality is such a bore :P I have discovered my truth, I make my reality the way I want it - and to me, existance is just is. (Intened wording)

Everything is just in a state of energy, it is knowlegde that shapes what our perspective of things are.

Though, I seem to be lacking energy to go on my ramble :) Back to violin practice.
The devil came to me in my sleep and asked me to work for him

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #16 on: 18/11/2009 12:01:51 »
Then maybe we can add another postulate, since we forbid the magic that could have produced a Big Bang.

Quote from: Opening Paragraph
Postulate: The final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field.
Postulate: Space and time are invariable. Space is empty nothingness. Time marches on from past to future and does not vary the rate of its progress.



Now with just these two postulates, we already see that any universe that can exist within that scenario will exhibit relativity phenomena. And if we were as mathematically adapt as Henri Poincare, we could create the equations that describe how any object existing there must distort in order to gain spatial movement. We would be able to write out the Lorentz Transforms just as Poincare and Lorentz did.
« Last Edit: 18/11/2009 12:10:54 by Vern »

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #17 on: 18/11/2009 12:11:39 »
Let me start by saying,

Perhaps there was no such thing as big-bang, that life itself existed FOREVER, we are applying Human concepts that something MUST start from somewhere, by implying it starts - gives it an implication it must end, life starts and ends. But the universe never started, it was just THERE to begin with (Or rather to not-begin with...), perhaps the earth was made via big-bang, but not the universe. Could be just a giant contradiction :)

Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth? ***

This being said, reality is such a bore :P I have discovered my truth, I make my reality the way I want it - and to me, existance is just is. (Intened wording)

Everything is just in a state of energy, it is knowlegde that shapes what our perspective of things are.

Though, I seem to be lacking energy to go on my ramble :) Back to violin practice.

Indeed there are many other contending theories. One off the top of my head is the Ekpyrotic Theory or Steady state, but i would almost hunch there was almost certainly a beginning of time, and therefor space as well, and since math is very strict, it seems the most plausible theory to entertain for many reasons.

Very true. I once made a similar verbal deduction of logic that something cannot simply come from nothing, which possibly means this ''nothingness'' was actually the ''everything-ness'' that was ever really required.

So what was it? A potential sea of information, because i myself would tend towards this.


Edit: *** ANSWER: ''Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth?''

Actually, the universe is what is called ''self-contained'' and since the universe encompasses everything then earth itself is also an ingredient of the big bang, no matter how miniscule :)
« Last Edit: 18/11/2009 12:14:14 by Mr. Scientist »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #18 on: 18/11/2009 13:24:03 »
Quote from: Mr. Scientist
Edit: *** ANSWER: ''Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth?''

When the Catholic Priest first proposed The Primevial Atom the idea was that the material universe sprang from one point and swelled into empty space. Now, the notion seems to have developed to have space and time being created in the event. It takes a magical religious mind to conceive a nothingness even more void of stuff than empty space. Yet, that is what is advocated; astonishingly some folks actually believe that.



*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #19 on: 18/11/2009 14:33:07 »
Quote from: Mr. Scientist
Edit: *** ANSWER: ''Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth?''

When the Catholic Priest first proposed The Primevial Atom the idea was that the material universe sprang from one point and swelled into empty space. Now, the notion seems to have developed to have space and time being created in the event. It takes a magical religious mind to conceive a nothingness even more void of stuff than empty space. Yet, that is what is advocated; astonishingly some folks actually believe that.



why don't people use physics Journals to publish ??
http://journals.aip.org/


*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #20 on: 18/11/2009 14:48:48 »
Quote from: Mr. Scientist
Edit: *** ANSWER: ''Correct me if I am wrong, but the Big Bang is about the creation of the UNIVERSE - not the earth?''

When the Catholic Priest first proposed The Primevial Atom the idea was that the material universe sprang from one point and swelled into empty space. Now, the notion seems to have developed to have space and time being created in the event. It takes a magical religious mind to conceive a nothingness even more void of stuff than empty space. Yet, that is what is advocated; astonishingly some folks actually believe that.



why don't people use physics Journals to publish ??
http://journals.aip.org/



Costly in time and also because dogma has now plauged the unversatility of the academic trained mind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #21 on: 18/11/2009 14:49:42 »
But hopefully when myself and Vern finalize a theory we can agree on, academic publishing will not be a problem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #22 on: 18/11/2009 14:53:10 »
But hopefully when myself and Vern finalize a theory we can agree on, academic publishing will not be a problem.
What ?
you both are working together ?
If I were to be a Physicist I would never work with other LOL.
I don't like to share the ideas esp. Physics !
don't take it personal.
but I am talking about myself !

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #23 on: 18/11/2009 16:14:49 »
Mr. Scientist and I have different views. However we can contribute to a combined effort. Schrodinger hated Quantum theory and thought it was completely irrational, but he contributed much to it.

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #24 on: 18/11/2009 16:46:02 »
Mr. Scientist and I have different views. However we can contribute to a combined effort. Schrodinger hated Quantum theory and thought it was completely irrational, but he contributed much to it.
Well, I love team work too..
But it might suit for you guys but Not me .. I always remain lonely.
Good luck Bro's of Physics !

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #25 on: 18/11/2009 18:23:21 »
When you contribute so as to advance the state of the art of physics, you will always be contributing to someone else's work. We still stand on the shoulders of giants like Newton, Maxwell, Poincare, Lorentz, and even Einstein, though his assumption of variable space-time was wrong. His arithmetic correctly describes material distortions in flat space-time.

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #26 on: 19/11/2009 01:57:04 »
When you contribute so as to advance the state of the art of physics, you will always be contributing to someone else's work. We still stand on the shoulders of giants like Newton, Maxwell, Poincare, Lorentz, and even Einstein, though his assumption of variable space-time was wrong. His arithmetic correctly describes material distortions in flat space-time.
I always looked by standing on the shoulder of giants.WOW these giants really give me a clear view of how cool the world of physics really is ..!!

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #27 on: 19/11/2009 03:36:12 »
The neat thing is that when we study these giants of physical reality and understand their discoveries, we can then advance the understanding a little further. But we are on the fringes. There is an unlimited variety of paths to the future. One of those represents reality; the unlimited amount of others represent false starts.

We plod along making mostly false starts. Then we back up and try another path. After thousands of such we gain insight into what is real in nature.

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #28 on: 19/11/2009 06:38:18 »
But hopefully when myself and Vern finalize a theory we can agree on, academic publishing will not be a problem.
What ?
you both are working together ?
If I were to be a Physicist I would never work with other LOL.
I don't like to share the ideas esp. Physics !
don't take it personal.
but I am talking about myself !


We differ in some of our views, but this could be cleverly orchestrated when written down, as point where we agree and where we have suspicions on each others contentions, whether mathematical or not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #29 on: 19/11/2009 06:39:13 »
Mr. Scientist and I have different views. However we can contribute to a combined effort. Schrodinger hated Quantum theory and thought it was completely irrational, but he contributed much to it.
Well, I love team work too..
But it might suit for you guys but Not me .. I always remain lonely.
Good luck Bro's of Physics !

Thnks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #30 on: 19/11/2009 09:48:48 »
The neat thing is that when we study these giants of physical reality and understand their discoveries, we can then advance the understanding a little further. But we are on the fringes. There is an unlimited variety of paths to the future. One of those represents reality; the unlimited amount of others represent false starts.

We plod along making mostly false starts. Then we back up and try another path. After thousands of such we gain insight into what is real in nature.
Have you guys met each other in real ?
How can you trust a person from online ?
I know its subject but How do you know each other ?
Just asking !!

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #31 on: 19/11/2009 10:49:34 »
What is to trust? I suspect there is no secret knowledge that one might stumble upon like finding a bag of gold so that it must be secreted lest it be stolen. Discovery, in physics, is open; there is no secret. We all openly discuss how we see nature's rules. Most of the time we are wrong. Sometimes we make enough sense that others agree for a while; usually even the agreed upon ideas must be abandoned for newer ones that make more sense.


*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #32 on: 19/11/2009 11:10:23 »
What is to trust? I suspect there is no secret knowledge that one might stumble upon like finding a bag of gold so that it must be secreted lest it be stolen. Discovery, in physics, is open; there is no secret. We all openly discuss how we see nature's rules. Most of the time we are wrong. Sometimes we make enough sense that others agree for a while; usually even the agreed upon ideas must be abandoned for newer ones that make more sense.


All the time I am talking about me .. PLEASE don't take it personal.
Ok !
so,
What do you think about real life of Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn ?
Hahn copied ! meitner's theories and got credit to Hahn !!
Both worked as a team ! but, due to Hitler Meitner got to leave German.
All the data than copied by Hahn !!
in fact all work was done and discovered by Meitner. She used to send all calculations to Hahn through letters.
so, finally Hahn cheated and gave credit to himself for all team work.

Ok I am not talking about you guys I am talking about my self.
History thought me !

In 1944, Hahn received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for the discovery of nuclear fission. Some historians who have documented the history of the discovery of nuclear fission believe Meitner should have been awarded the Nobel Prize with Hahn

   
« Last Edit: 19/11/2009 11:15:31 by Kiran The King Kai »

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #33 on: 19/11/2009 11:11:56 »
Mr. Scientist and I have different views. However we can contribute to a combined effort. Schrodinger hated Quantum theory and thought it was completely irrational, but he contributed much to it.
Well, I love team work too..
But it might suit for you guys but Not me .. I always remain lonely.
Good luck Bro's of Physics !

Thnks.
Mr.scientist don't take it too personal what I said but it was always about me.
Have you met each other ?

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #34 on: 19/11/2009 11:20:04 »
After the war, Meitner, while acknowledging her own moral failing in staying in Germany from 1933 to 1938, was bitterly critical of Hahn and other German scientists who had collaborated with the Nazis and done nothing to protest against the crimes of Hitler's regime. Referring to the leading German scientist Werner Heisenberg, she said: "Heisenberg and many millions with him should be forced to see these camps and the martyred people." She wrote to Hahn:
Meitner's Grave in Bramley

    "You all worked for Nazi Germany. And you tried to offer only a passive resistance. Certainly, to buy off your conscience you helped here and there a persecuted person, but millions of innocent human beings were allowed to be murdered without any kind of protest being uttered ... [it is said that] first you betrayed your friends, then your children in that you let them stake their lives on a criminal war and finally that you betrayed Germany itself, because when the war was already quite hopeless, you did not once arm yourselves against the senseless destruction of Germany."[16]

Meitner and Hahn were lifelong friends.[17]

Meitner became a Swedish citizen in 1949, but moved to Britain in 1960 and died in Cambridge in 1968, shortly before her 90th birthday.[1] As was her wish, she was buried in the village of Bramley in Hampshire, at St. James parish church, close to her younger brother Walter, who had died in 1964. Her nephew Otto Robert Frisch composed the inscription on her headstone. It reads "Lise Meitner: a physicist who never lost her humanity."

According to the psychologist David Keirsey, she was an intj[18], a set of people who have the least emotional, most rational personalities.

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #35 on: 19/11/2009 11:21:35 »
Vern and mr.scientist I know only you guys in this forum.
could you guys plz help me in choosing my physics career ??

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=26830.0;topicseen

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #36 on: 19/11/2009 12:07:59 »
By now you must know of my distaste for Quantum theory, including M and String. I consider them to be ridiculously stupid at their foundation. However you will have to study them; you can only avoid reaching the same conclusion as I by accepting magic as reality. Energy transforms to mass by magic, for example. The magic of virtual particles pops up and saves the theory, for example. Observation magically causes wave function collapse to bring a superimposed state into reality, for example.

So I would say, learn it well, but know that it is not what is real in the universe. But we welcome you to contribute to what can possibly be real in the universe. So far we have:

Postulate: The final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field.

and

Postulate: Space and time are invariant.

Now, you can add a contender for another postulate, or you can speculate about nature within the two postulates. We have so far, that these two postulates alone demand all relativity phenomena including time dilation.
« Last Edit: 19/11/2009 12:38:27 by Vern »

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #37 on: 19/11/2009 12:13:35 »
Mr. Scientist and I have different views. However we can contribute to a combined effort. Schrodinger hated Quantum theory and thought it was completely irrational, but he contributed much to it.
Well, I love team work too..
But it might suit for you guys but Not me .. I always remain lonely.
Good luck Bro's of Physics !

Thnks.
Mr.scientist don't take it too personal what I said but it was always about me.
Have you met each other ?

Personal? I think you're a sound guy.

Don't get paranoid friend :L)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #38 on: 19/11/2009 12:15:19 »
Would you like to be part of this? I know you could create the diagrams for both my own and verns contentions...


...Oh God, i do hope me and vern see eye to concerning the gravitational charge-need in this theory he has advocated for many years :) He's a good guy too. Very patient.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #39 on: 19/11/2009 12:18:31 »
Vern and mr.scientist I know only you guys in this forum.
could you guys plz help me in choosing my physics career ??

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=26830.0;topicseen

This is a choice that depends soley on what your own preferences are. If you know you have excelled in area's where you think devolopment is required, then you have made a more wiser choice, than to base it on ideologies from other who's methods and understandings maybe antiquated and synonymously weak.

So - dependance and help can have a fine blue line. This is my advice :) Do what feels right, not what necesserily others may contend.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #40 on: 19/11/2009 12:28:07 »
Would you like to be part of this? I know you could create the diagrams for both my own and verns contentions...

...Oh God, i do hope me and vern see eye to concerning the gravitational charge-need in this theory he has advocated for many years :) He's a good guy too. Very patient.

It is difficult for me to get a clear view of the gravity charge you propose. It was about twenty years into searching for what could possibly cause the phenomena of gravity that I realized that the extended fields of a photon would be too weak to react with matter.

Then I realized that if this were so, and the electric and magnetic amplitude of photons is a constant, the diminished photon fields would contribute to that saturation amplitude. The result would be gravitational phenomena.

Now, although the arithmetic demands it, I have yet to see anyone offer confirmation of my contention that photons exist as saturated points of electric and magnetic amplitude.

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #41 on: 19/11/2009 12:34:30 »
Would you like to be part of this? I know you could create the diagrams for both my own and verns contentions...

...Oh God, i do hope me and vern see eye to concerning the gravitational charge-need in this theory he has advocated for many years :) He's a good guy too. Very patient.

It is difficult for me to get a clear view of the gravity charge you propose. It was about twenty years into searching for what could possibly cause the phenomena of gravity that I realized that the extended fields of a photon would be too weak to react with matter.

Then I realized that if this were so, and the electric and magnetic amplitude of photons is a constant, the diminished photon fields would contribute to that saturation amplitude. The result would be gravitational phenomena.

Now, although the arithmetic demands it, I have yet to see anyone offer confirmation of my contention that photons exist as saturated points of electric and magnetic amplitude.

If you could vern, could you amplify the things which make it difficult so i may answer them as honestly as possible, because there is nothing worse than being confused.

Quick example/ it took me a year top comprehend your electromagnetical cycle componants of the photon... :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #42 on: 19/11/2009 12:44:12 »
I guess I have trouble keeping pieces of the puzzle in mind while going through long paragraphs that don't directly contribute to the puzzle.

We need the notion condensed to a concise paragraph. I can search back through your postings and see if I can do that, or you might try. [:)]

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #43 on: 19/11/2009 12:55:01 »
Well, straight off the top of my mind the bolded parts can be given an explanation to hopefully satisfy this:

It was about twenty years into searching for what could possibly cause the phenomena of gravity that I realized that the extended fields of a photon would be too weak to react with matter

Not if it has a gravitational couping, which was why, inexorably, i invited it into your interesting curved hypothesis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #44 on: 19/11/2009 13:08:11 »
I couldn't connect the bolded text with your gravity charge notion. As I recall, you proposed a magnetic monopole as the gravitational charge. That part did not sink in for me.

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #45 on: 19/11/2009 13:21:17 »
I couldn't connect the bolded text with your gravity charge notion. As I recall, you proposed a magnetic monopole as the gravitational charge. That part did not sink in for me.

HGi vern again_ lol

Basically you agree a photon produces a gravitational field?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶

*

Kiran The King Kai

  • Guest
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #46 on: 19/11/2009 16:16:19 »
photon produces a gravitational field?

guys where are you >?<

What light got to do with gravity ?

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #47 on: 19/11/2009 17:23:52 »
I couldn't connect the bolded text with your gravity charge notion. As I recall, you proposed a magnetic monopole as the gravitational charge. That part did not sink in for me.

HGi vern again_ lol

Basically you agree a photon produces a gravitational field?

Yes; and I proposed the mechanism for that.

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #48 on: 19/11/2009 17:27:17 »
Quote from: Kiran The King Kai
What light got to do with gravity ?

Light, as in the electromagnetic field, is the only source of gravity in a photon-only universe.

Light is one of multiple different sources of gravity in currently accepted theory.

*

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1451
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Re: Can we build a new Reality Theory?
« Reply #49 on: 20/11/2009 01:53:49 »
I couldn't connect the bolded text with your gravity charge notion. As I recall, you proposed a magnetic monopole as the gravitational charge. That part did not sink in for me.


Basically you agree a photon produces a gravitational field?

Yes; and I proposed the mechanism for that.
Cool - because that means in an elementary-sense that we actually do agree on the use of gravito-EM relationships. We have very little idea's actually  which clash. :)
HGi vern again_ lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZGcNx8nV8U

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶