0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I couldn't connect the bolded text with your gravity charge notion. As I recall, you proposed a magnetic monopole as the gravitational charge. That part did not sink in for me.
I have not yet seen the need to name the residual fields that I visualize as gravitons. They would be changing electric and magnetic amplitude potential, but would be too weak to directly interact with anything. Photons moving through these weak fields would find their points of saturation at a slight offset toward increasing field strength of the diminished fields.
No form required; just think, and show us your thoughts. This is speculation, so don't be restrained in your thinking. Feel free to use any ideas you find here; when you go for your Nobel, just give us honourable mention.
More than millions. We are talking around 10^10^123!!Wild eh?
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 21/11/2009 14:08:01More than millions. We are talking around 10^10^123!!Wild eh?I wonder why it is that although we have known this for about 200 years and there is not even one piece of experimental evidence that it is not what is real; we still cling to magical ideas of reality.
If we reduce it even further, there may be no motion at all.
Quote from: Mr. Scientist on 27/11/2009 20:16:03If we reduce it even further, there may be no motion at all.Are you saying that motion does'nt exist? This reminds me of Einstein's world line where every change is not movement but a totally new existence for every Planck unit of time.
Vern if you could mess. me, it would be appreciated. I have a few things to discuss with you. Thnks
I suspect we should be careful of Planck units. We can only logically deduce one Planck unit. That is the constant whose energy is E = hv; we can deduce from that simple equation that the amplitude of electric and magnetic potential is a constant in photons. This is an absolute deduction as real as 1 + 1 = 2. Planck's constant is the energy content of the rate of change of electric and magnetic amplitude over time. If the amplitude reached by this change were variable, it would need be part of the equation. It is not part of the equation. It is a constant. We would then suspect; since we never see a greater amplitude value; that this constant electric and magnetic amplitude for empty space is the maximum that empty space can support.But just because this is real for electromagnetic amplitudes in empty space, it does not even suggest that it may have any meaning at all for other things like time and spatial area.
What are the fundamental factors that demand the quantization of space-time? We have those with the electromagnetic field; we don't hove those with spatial or temporal dimensions.
It is known from relativity that an absolute frame of reference does not exist. It is therefore obvious that the rest of the maximass can exist only in comparison with other observers.
The physical meaning of the formula derives from the ratio of the velocity c of the wavefronts moving in the orbit and the velocity ve of the wave source-electron in the same orbit.We must remember that we are referring to those wavefronts moving along the ideal tube whose axis is the orbit on which the closed path of the electron-wave source lies.Figure 95 shows that "137" wavefronts of wavelength le move in the orbit in a resonance state, and that for each revolution made by the wave source the wavefronts coming from it make "137" revolutions.
But just because this is real for electromagnetic amplitudes in empty space, it does not even suggest that it may have any meaning at all for other things like time and spatial area.
I didn't mean to suggest that space and time can not exist as quantized chunks. They may very well be. It is just that Planck's constant is a completely different animal with an easily discovered cause which would be different for space and time.Cause of Planck's constant: The maximum electric and magnetic amplitude of electromagnetic waves is a constant.This can be derived from E = hv. It says that photon energy is Planck's constant times the rate of change of the electromagnetic field. The change of the electromagnetic field must go to some amplitude. This amplitude is not part of the equation. It must therefore be a constant.
That last one was a little over my head; I didn't quite grasp the meaning of it. 
Photon points moving through the fields of other photons reach their maximum amplitude with the help of the the fields of other photons. The result is that maximum amplitude occurs at an offset toward increasing field strength of the fields of other photons.
In truth without matter or light, space would not exist. They are all connected.