0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Some things in the world don't act like they should in classical mechanics. In general, evidence for GR proceeds by showing the relativistic effects that go beyond what one expects in Newtonian mechanics. According to GR, Newtonian mechanics is mostly right.
Is it acceptable to sweep aside experimental evidence that is described in terms of Classical Mechanics with statements like "According to General Relativity, that's clearly wrong!" without providing sufficient explanation (or any explanation) for the observation in terms of General Relativity?
Would it be reasonable for Old Newtonians to conclude that New Relativists who are unable, or unwilling, to explain the observed phenomena, either in terms of Classical Mechanics, or General Relativity, are simply talking through their hats?