The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Graviton emission and absorption?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Graviton emission and absorption?

  • 5 Replies
  • 7318 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Kryptid (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5708
  • Activity:
    87.5%
  • Thanked: 239 times
    • View Profile
Graviton emission and absorption?
« on: 07/12/2005 21:28:04 »
Most people here are most likely familiar with how an atom absorbs a photon. A photon with energy X is absorbed by an electron in orbit around an atom. This electron, now with energy X added to it, jumps to a higher energy state. After another photon with energy X is emitted by that electron, it falls back into its lower energy state once more.

But, once that electron absorbs the photon, what prevents it from re-emitting that same energy as a graviton with energy X instead of a photon with energy X? Neither photons nor gravitons have properties such as lepton number or electric charge which must be conserved. Both of these particles are pretty bare as far as conserved properties are concerned. My guess is that it would have to do with the spin differences between the two particles.

On another note, can an electron in orbit around an atom theoretically absorb a graviton and re-emit it in a similar fashion that some electrons absorb and re-emit photons?

Is there any way to stimulate an excited atom with excess energy X to emit a graviton with energy X?
Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: Graviton emission and absorption?
« Reply #1 on: 07/12/2005 21:57:36 »
Maybe because there isn't actually any such thing as a graviton?
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3384
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Graviton emission and absorption?
« Reply #2 on: 07/12/2005 23:25:46 »
Remember always that the energy levels for emission and absorption have to fit into a classical system even though they are quantised. That is,  electron energy levels and orbit dimensions together with the energy changes between orbits are just as if they were classical non quantised particles.  Quantum theory just overlays this fuzzes it up with uncertainty and places defined values for angular momenta to produce the precise energy levels.

The graviton may be a bit wierd and hypothetical but it does fit into the particle mengerie quite well and seems as least as plausible as other particles that have been suggested theoretically and subsequebtly identified.  The big problem is that the gravitational energy effects in atoms are so tiny that they are totally undetectable with current technology.

I'm not even sure that quantised gravitational interactions are likely to be obseved much in materials as dense as neutron stars which are only a little bit bigger than a black hole with the same mass.  Even then such observations would be very difficult at astronomical distances.



Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: Graviton emission and absorption?
« Reply #3 on: 08/12/2005 01:17:54 »
Isn't it hypothesised that releasing gravitons would take an incredible amount of energy? Far more than we can currently generate?
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3384
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Graviton emission and absorption?
« Reply #4 on: 08/12/2005 09:39:48 »
No.  They are like photons and can have very low energies at low frequencies as most gravitational related phenomena are.  Remember the energy of a photon is Plancks constant times the frequency of the radiation. You don't see processes involving individual photons much below 1GHz.  The lowest I can think of at the moment is the 1.4Ghz hyperfine hydrogen line sometimes called the 21 cm line.  I suppose NMR is another case that reaches down into low radio frequencies at low fields but that is a real exception.

Now think of gravitational processes, like things orbiting each other  even a pair of neutron stars in close orbit can only manage a few KHz.  OK we can detect the loss of energy by graviton emission by the decay rate of the orbits but we can't detect the gravitons  - yet, although the latest gravity wave detectors are thought to be getting pretty close to managing it.

An interesting aside is, I tend to wonder if the latest discoveries involving "dark matter" and "dark energy" are someting to do with the basic background radiation of gravitiational waves that must exist in the universe rendering gravitiational fields inneffective at very low values.

This would work in the same way as  the atoms in the air in the room don't all drop to the floor under gravity because they are all batting aroud too fast because they are at room temperature or it is difficult to cool things out in the universe down below a couple of degrees kelvin because the cosmic microwave bacground would warm them up.  The only natural things that are cooler than this are isolated largish black holes and they require violent compressive processes to make them.

Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
« Last Edit: 08/12/2005 09:56:10 by Soul Surfer »
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: Graviton emission and absorption?
« Reply #5 on: 08/12/2005 12:41:50 »
I was reading an article on particle accelerators recently & I'm sure it said something about the production of gravitons requiring far more energy than we can achieve.
And isn't 1 of the problems with GUT that we have no means of testing anything to do with bringing gravity into the model as the energy requirements for such an experiment are way beyond our capabilities?
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How can a graviton escape from a Black Hole?

Started by FredBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 9980
Last post 05/02/2009 14:04:39
by ...lets split up...
What is the relationship of the Higgs Boson to the graviton?

Started by @/anticBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 3409
Last post 07/07/2012 10:20:31
by Soul Surfer
Does dark matter and the graviton exist?

Started by IzzieCBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 2619
Last post 22/03/2018 08:16:04
by guest45734
How does physics explain the graviton?

Started by Chemistry4meBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 53
Views: 15770
Last post 17/03/2009 19:18:33
by Vern
What would be the implications of the Graviton having a non zero mass

Started by syhprumBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 9
Views: 2706
Last post 30/03/2016 22:44:04
by Bill S
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.156 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.