The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?

  • 3 Replies
  • 3204 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pushkar (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 15
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?
« on: 23/03/2010 07:12:40 »
can the results of general theory of relativity be accurately derived without discarding the concept of Euclidean flat space


MOD EDIT - Please make the subject a question.
« Last Edit: 23/03/2010 10:08:11 by BenV »
Logged
 



Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?
« Reply #1 on: 23/03/2010 08:54:38 »
Which results? Many results of GR cannot be derived explicitly at all because the equations that result are too complex and have no analytical solution, even with simple metrics. Many "results" can be observed via numerical analysis on suitably powerfiul computers though. This does not give so much insight perhaps but does produce answers.
Logged
 

Offline Farsight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 396
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?
« Reply #2 on: 23/03/2010 13:19:25 »
I don't think so, pushkar. There's a paper called Inhomogeneous Vacuum: An Alternative Interpretation of Curved Spacetime which is interesting, see http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ChPhL..25.1571Y. This is more reasonable than people generally appreciate, because Einstein did talk about inhomogeneous space and curvilinear motion rather than curved spacetime per se:

"This space-time variability of the reciprocal relations of the standards of space and time, or, perhaps, the recognition of the fact that “empty space” in its physical relation is neither homogeneous nor isotropic, compelling us to describe its state by ten functions (the gravitation potentials gμν)..."

But there is an issue. When you move away from the idea of curved spacetime and think in terms of inhomogeneous space instead, you find that you need something to cause this inhomogeneity. Then you find yourself with curved space, and all you've done is swapped one geometry for another.
Logged
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 12 times
    • View Profile
Can general relativity be derived without discarding Euclidean flat space?
« Reply #3 on: 23/03/2010 13:24:39 »
Quote from: pushkar on 23/03/2010 07:12:40
can the results of general theory of relativity be accurately derived without discarding the concept of Euclidean flat space
*Space* could be flat in a *curved* spacetime. You intended exactly "space" or "spacetime"?
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Can anything be "still" in space?

Started by SeanyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 31
Views: 11606
Last post 31/12/2017 16:56:38
by jeffreyH
Is "Space" distinct from "nothingness"? (and the Vacuum)

Started by geordiefBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 36
Views: 1733
Last post 30/06/2019 22:47:32
by flummoxed
We Know The Extent Of The Sun, What Is The Extent Of Space Time?

Started by TitanscapeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 5908
Last post 27/04/2008 23:10:10
by turnipsock
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 6534
Last post 04/05/2009 00:21:43
by Vern
Is a stationary object in space really stationary?

Started by chintanBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 19
Views: 7500
Last post 04/05/2017 17:19:48
by Yahya
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.176 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.