The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?

  • 6 Replies
  • 5026 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jrussell (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« on: 28/04/2010 16:18:17 »
a) space and time can no longer be thought of as seperate entities, and it is far more accurate to combine the two into a space-time

b) there is no fixed point in space, ergo, no fixed point in space time

c) it is reasonable to suggest, then, that each moment of 'time' - now spacetime, should be able to be co-ordinated as a point in space and a point in time, albeit one that is moving

my question is this; if we know the speed and distance that has passed between two points in spacetime, and presuming one can break the cosmic speed limit, if we used the co-ordinates of a point in space and time, would we find that moment in time?

further points -

d) an outside observer at some distance could be observing the french revolution as though that were the present, of course if they set out to visit byt the time they got here that would be the past. is it that we could only observe the co-ordinates and never visit, even breaking the cosmic speed limit?

e) if we can visit those co-ordinates, why do satellites not show a continual stream of moments in time and space?

hope that makes sense



Mod edit - I've formatted the subject as a question, feel free to change it to something more accurate.  Please make sure all your subjects are in the form of a question - it makes the forum tidier and easier to navigate.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: 30/04/2010 12:04:47 by BenV »
Logged
 



Offline flr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #1 on: 29/04/2010 19:55:27 »
Quote
b) there is no fixed point in space, ergo, no fixed point in space time

What do you mean by that? Would you give an example?
Logged
 

Offline jrussell (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #2 on: 30/04/2010 09:09:46 »
well, space is not static, it is expanding, and not simply from the edge of the univers, if such a thing exists, but the space in-between objects in space is expanding; therefore there can be no fixed point in space, there is no one 'address' if you will that will be the same at any two points in time
Logged
 

Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #3 on: 30/04/2010 09:19:01 »
Models of the universe can be complicated, and recent ones are using 5 dimensions rather than 4, but there is always (I think) some coordinate system. If we take your 4-D space-time example, which is commonly accepted and consistent with Special and General relativity, it has 4 coordinates which uniquely define positions in space-time. These are not the same as locations in space because of the extra time dimension but are referred to as "events". The 4D equivalent to distance is called an "interval". In flat (Minkowski) space, assumed in special relativity, the 4 axes are orthogonal. In GR spacetime can be curved and the maths (and visualisation)becomes a bit hard, but the principle of a coordinate system remains.
Logged
 

Offline jrussell (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #4 on: 30/04/2010 16:19:12 »
i appreciate that. however, i do believe that if we accept space and time as one and not two factors, then each 'moment' can be defined by co-ordinates of its point in space and time, and perhaps velocity and direction in time. my confusion comes from the conflicting idea, at least conflicting to me, that space is not fixed and is expanding; this is why it is believed there is no 'centre' of the universe - it expands constantly and would have to constantly move to adjust.

so, surely any co-ordinates must be incorrect?
Logged
 



Offline PhysBang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 706
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
    • View Profile
Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #5 on: 30/04/2010 17:13:17 »
There is a way to use whatever coordinate system you wish. However, doing physics in many coordinate systems is incredibly difficult.
Logged
Naked Scientists values: support moderators who try to demean posters by suggesting that they are Catholic, support moderators who ignore homophobic and transphobic threads, support moderators who promote climate change denial.
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Does "spacetime" give you co-ordinates in space and time?
« Reply #6 on: 30/04/2010 17:49:52 »
Quote from: jrussell on 30/04/2010 16:19:12
i appreciate that. however, i do believe that if we accept space and time as one and not two factors, then each 'moment' can be defined by co-ordinates of its point in space and time, and perhaps velocity and direction in time. my confusion comes from the conflicting idea, at least conflicting to me, that space is not fixed and is expanding; this is why it is believed there is no 'centre' of the universe - it expands constantly and would have to constantly move to adjust.

so, surely any co-ordinates must be incorrect?

I think the confusion might be that you're concerned with calculating how things move within space-time.  The equations of general relativity also tell you how space-time itself moves (and expands), and keep track of how things move within this expanding space-time.  So in theory, you should be able to calculate how something moves within space-time while the space-time itself is expanding.  Defining coordinates for something could be done in that case, since you know how the coordinates have to move as well as knowing how the object moves within those moving coordinates.

In practice, these equations are often going to be incredibly complex, so doing the calculations might not be practical.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 24690
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
If you could travel faster than light, could you travel in time?

Started by DmaierBoard Technology

Replies: 13
Views: 14287
Last post 19/03/2020 14:56:52
by Paul25
If the speed of light is constant, time must be constant too?

Started by Chuck FBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 11887
Last post 19/03/2020 14:51:12
by Paul25
If gravity is a warping of time, why are we trying to detect gravity?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 10
Views: 5053
Last post 19/03/2020 14:48:11
by Paul25
Will a bullet fired forward hit the floor at the same time as one fired down?

Started by Edwin Brennan Board That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 8
Views: 10009
Last post 11/11/2008 18:13:07
by lyner
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.259 seconds with 51 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.