The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?

  • 26 Replies
  • 12900 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1185
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #20 on: 30/07/2010 21:10:03 »
Geezer, you have never used bipolar RF power transistors, they are very static sensitive, not to mention load sensitive, heat sensitive and also have that lovely pink ceramic casing that carries the tag Beryllium Oxide - Caution Toxic. Only good thing was that when installed they really work well.

Valves are so hard to damage because they have a lot of surface on the anodes, and they will happily run till bright cherry red on overload, whilst the bipolar dissipates all it's heat in a tiny bit of silicon around 5 by 5mm, that has about the same heat density as the surface of the sun in the worst case.
Logged
 



Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #21 on: 30/07/2010 21:52:22 »
Quote from: SeanB on 30/07/2010 21:10:03
Geezer, you have never used bipolar RF power transistors, they are very static sensitive, not to mention load sensitive, heat sensitive and also have that lovely pink ceramic casing that carries the tag Beryllium Oxide - Caution Toxic. Only good thing was that when installed they really work well.


No. I was thinking of something more like a 2N3055 which, I suspect, has about the same RF response as a slug [:D]

Yes, power density has a lot to do with it, but don't forget that "tubes" are intrinsically current limiting and they are dealing with relatively small currents whereas power transistors are dealing with relatively high currents and the only thing (within the transistor itself) that limits the current is the current gain.
« Last Edit: 31/07/2010 07:59:53 by Geezer »
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1185
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #22 on: 31/07/2010 10:38:40 »
Geezer, I worked on equipment that was poorly designed, and had a switching transistor that was poorly heatsinked, and badly driven. Peak current was 40A and average was 10A, well beyond your common 2N3055. I used to select the transistors based on BE saturation voltage, as a few mV here made a difference ( along with selecting a 2N2219A driver that had a high gain and would saturate with the limited drive) between surviving a while or going short circuit in worst case or merely unsoldering itself at best. Eventually I got a good batch of BUX40 that would survive, the batch was at the top end of spec for Hfe and most did survive.

A 2N3055, depending on who made it, often has a gain roll off at under 10kHz, not what you would like in an amplifier. I did use some as active loads, by soldering leads onto then and dropping them into a ceramic cup ( old tea cup) filled with cold water. Driven with a 555 timer and used to test power supplies for load stability, they generally worked well until all the water had boiled off, then glowed white hot and burnt out.

Logged
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #23 on: 31/07/2010 21:25:18 »
Ah yes! The 3055 would not be the ideal choice for an output stage.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline tommya300 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 654
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #24 on: 01/08/2010 03:02:25 »
Quote from: Geezer on 31/07/2010 21:25:18
Ah yes! The 3055 would not be the ideal choice for an output stage.

Can economics dictate and dominate the use of the 2n3055, when the application is just for a PA system? The vocal speaking bandwidth needed is just to accomadate 1KHz +/- 10KHz. Or for real cheap sounding Ghetto Blasters.
Logged
 



Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1185
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #25 on: 01/08/2010 16:36:07 »
Sadly you can get cheaper and nastier than the 2N3055, all you need is to look at those that come in a TO220 package, where the cost of the package is greater than the cost of the die inside. Especially if you are buying an "off spec" device as well.


I do remember having some that were sold as off spec, many were so bad they could not be operated at 20% of the ratings, and were all uniformly right at the bottom of the gain range for the type.

I still have a few dozen NOS germanium transistors, some point contact but most are alloyed.

Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21981
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Why did Vacuum Tube Technology tolerate heavy loading on the finals of an amp?
« Reply #26 on: 01/08/2010 17:43:13 »
Quote from: SeanB on 31/07/2010 10:38:40
Geezer, I worked on equipment that was poorly designed, and had a switching transistor that was poorly heatsinked, and badly driven. Peak current was 40A and average was 10A, well beyond your common 2N3055. I used to select the transistors based on BE saturation voltage, as a few mV here made a difference ( along with selecting a 2N2219A driver that had a high gain and would saturate with the limited drive) between surviving a while or going short circuit in worst case or merely unsoldering itself at best. Eventually I got a good batch of BUX40 that would survive, the batch was at the top end of spec for Hfe and most did survive.

A 2N3055, depending on who made it, often has a gain roll off at under 10kHz, not what you would like in an amplifier. I did use some as active loads, by soldering leads onto then and dropping them into a ceramic cup ( old tea cup) filled with cold water. Driven with a 555 timer and used to test power supplies for load stability, they generally worked well until all the water had boiled off, then glowed white hot and burnt out.


You had something the size of a 2n3055 glow white hot? What were you powering it with?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is "Space" distinct from "nothingness"? (and the Vacuum)

Started by geordiefBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 36
Views: 4204
Last post 30/06/2019 22:47:32
by pensador
Can matter in a vacuum create dark energy and dark matter effects?

Started by GoscienceBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 8726
Last post 10/05/2011 23:37:24
by yor_on
Which new space technology will be the most useful for space exploration?

Started by bearnard1212Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 113
Last post Today at 14:44:35
by bearnard1212
Why does light travel at the speed of light? (in a vacuum).

Started by AirthumbsBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 47
Views: 24737
Last post 30/07/2011 09:13:54
by MikeS
Could "vacuum" bombs be used to fight fires?

Started by another_someoneBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 9684
Last post 01/08/2007 16:11:57
by another_someone
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.133 seconds with 48 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.