The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. What things can block x-ray imaging at airport customs?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

What things can block x-ray imaging at airport customs?

  • 40 Replies
  • 357471 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sabali (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
What things can block x-ray imaging at airport customs?
« on: 26/11/2011 12:23:59 »
I'm writing a book about a group of criminals and just wanted to be really factually accurate.
So far I;ve heard Lead can , and carbon paper. if anyone can add to these two or expand on my question with a answer I would greatly appreciate it.

thanks
« Last Edit: 18/05/2013 21:06:59 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #1 on: 26/11/2011 13:00:44 »
Very dense materials generally block x-rays well.  Lead and tungsten are frequently used.  Of course, if you put these in your luggage at an airport, you'd be pulled aside for "extra screening," since having a chunk of lead in your luggage is a sign that you're trying to hide something.
Logged
 

Offline sabali (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #2 on: 26/11/2011 13:13:10 »
Thanks , Do you know alot about lead ?
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #3 on: 26/11/2011 13:43:48 »
A few millimeters of metal isn’t necessary enough to block X-rays :
you can see the truck's engine, as well as the illegal immigrants in the back ...


http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=6326.msg254272#msg254272

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_X-ray
« Last Edit: 26/11/2011 13:48:07 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline sabali (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #4 on: 26/11/2011 15:32:47 »
i suspect  those x ray machines are alot more powerful then the tiny ones that scan packages.
thats just logical.

im interested in hiding something concealed within a package
Logged
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22000
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #5 on: 26/11/2011 15:59:37 »
RD, that's a backscatter image, so the xrays don't need to go through the engine to image it.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline sabali (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #6 on: 26/11/2011 16:06:24 »
hey bored chemist i sent you a personal message :)
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #7 on: 26/11/2011 16:52:33 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/11/2011 15:59:37
RD, that's a backscatter image, so the xrays don't need to go through the engine to image it.

They do need to pass through the metal bodywork of the truck for the engine to be visible,
(bodywork could be Aluminium rather than steel)


 [ Invalid Attachment ]

* stretched-truck.jpg (106.12 kB, 800x300 - viewed 272207 times.)
« Last Edit: 26/11/2011 17:05:12 by RD »
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22000
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #8 on: 26/11/2011 16:54:49 »
If they didn't passsthrough that then they wouldn't be a lot of use for this purpose. The point is that the skin of the truck is quite thin.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline sabali (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #9 on: 26/11/2011 17:11:31 »
check your inbox mate :)
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #10 on: 26/11/2011 17:34:55 »
As mentioned, the x-rays will pass through different substances at different rates, thus giving an image of what is inside of the container.  Presumably if something isn't showing up well, the intensity or exposure time can be increased.  Or they will do a physical inspection of the questionable object.

The biggest concern is to make one object appear like another.  

I.E. semi-liquid explosives could be put into toothpaste and shampoo bottles, which is why those items may be restricted from carry-on bags.  Of course, a detonator stuck to a toothpaste tube might show up in the scans.

Years ago I took a 110V/220V transformer to Europe with me which was a block of steel & copper wires weighing about 10 or 20 lbs.  But, even so, it probably had a very distinctive look in the X-Rays.  Modern laptop power supplies invariably take 110/220V, and thus all one needs is the proper plug adapters.

A well supplied terrorist undoubtedly would get access to a fluoroscopy machine for "testing" purposes.
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 273 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #11 on: 27/11/2011 10:38:34 »
The x-rays have definitely gone through the people because their lungs look nice and dark in the pictures. I'm very impressed at the quality of that image - it's good enough to do diagnoses of TB almost. I wonder if that's part of HMRC's cost-cutting initiative - save money by screening people and trucks on the way into the country...
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22000
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #12 on: 27/11/2011 10:50:10 »
Knowing the HMRC they are more likely to use the technology to assess the quality and hence the true value of the bananas.
I agree that they xrays go through the people (twice), but, again, that's hardly news.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1185
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #13 on: 27/11/2011 20:09:33 »
The whole truck scanner does use a very high power source, to get the detected signal out of the noise floor. Note there is no driver inside, as otherwise he would be regularly exposed to a very high dose of very ionising radiation. not good for the hidden passengers, and probably quite capable of fogging any undeveloped film inside the truck, possibly even possibly erasing flash media ( bye bye truck engine management, and any electronics on board the truck) in the path.

Airline scanners hopefully are not as high powered, as they do not need to penetrate a few inches of steel plate.
Logged
 

Offline damocles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #14 on: 27/11/2011 21:31:46 »
The principle of X-ray examination is that different atoms reflect or absorb X-rays differently. So the main thing that X-rays show up is the atomic composition of whatever material they pass through/fail to pass through/reflect off. In most situations X-rays pass easiest through light atoms (hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen), and with more difficulty through heavier atoms (phosphorus, sulfur <iron, nickel, copper <silver <gold , mercury, lead)

The most favourable likely thing for your international criminals to have in their package would be uncut diamonds (carbon), and to disguise them by mixing in with a pack of scorched almonds or similar (also mostly carbon & oxygen). The only thing I am not sure of is whether the x-ray scanner would pick up suspicious diffraction rings or spots from the crystalline nature of the diamonds which would not be so clearly produced by the chocolates. Similarly most drugs are not detectable by X-ray machines, but they do have sniffer dogs at airports!
Logged
1 4 6 4 1
4 4 9 4 4     
a perfect perfect square square
6 9 6 9 6
4 4 9 4 4
1 4 6 4 1
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22000
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #15 on: 28/11/2011 18:47:58 »
OK, so I know that the manufacturer's website is hardly an unbiased opinion but it seems that the Xray dose isn't very big.
http://www.saic.com/products/security/vacis-xpl/
My guess is that the driver isn't in that vehicle because he is talking to Customs about his cargo.
Once they see the image they will want to talk at more length.

I'm fairly sure that x ray scanners don't produce diffraction images because it would need monochromatic Xrays and the image would be horrible convoluted.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline damocles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #16 on: 28/11/2011 20:50:24 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/11/2011 18:47:58
I'm fairly sure that x ray scanners don't produce diffraction images because it would need monochromatic Xrays and the image would be horrible convoluted.


The most common/simplest type of X-ray generator has an electron beam at several kV impinging on a metal target -- often copper. It therefore provides not a monochromatic source, but certainly a line spectrum with few lines, and CuKα dominating. While it is very likely that a scanner image would be too convoluted for diffraction spots or rings to be detected, I would not be totally sure of that.

The brochure that can be downloaded from the linked manufacturer's site says, inter alia,

Quote
Powerful imaging performance

The VACIS XPL system’s switched-energy X-ray source simultaneously screens vehicles at two
different energies, displaying organic threats such as explosives, stowaways and drugs in a
different color to help inspectors quickly evaluate the vehicle’s contents. The system also
provides conventional high-resolution black-and-white X-ray images to help inspectors
identify metallic threats such as guns.
The system can image passenger cars and light trucks from roof to pavement and bumper to
bumper, allowing the entire vehicle to be quickly and efficiently screened.


"Two different energies" implies a fairly efficient monochromator, and effectively a pair of monochromatic scans. I think the real issue about detecting diffraction would come with spatial resolution and convolution rather than wavelength convolution. Diffraction spots are much weaker than a direct through-beam or a specular back-scatter, and their presence would not generally be welcome in an imaging procedure anyway (they would tend to blur and confuse the image).
Logged
1 4 6 4 1
4 4 9 4 4     
a perfect perfect square square
6 9 6 9 6
4 4 9 4 4
1 4 6 4 1
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22000
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 511 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #17 on: 28/11/2011 21:24:24 »
""Two different energies" implies a fairly efficient monochromator, and effectively a pair of monochromatic scans."
Or it implies two different acceleration voltages and "optimistic" writing.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #18 on: 29/11/2011 09:15:59 »
Quote from: damocles on 27/11/2011 21:31:46
The most favourable likely thing for your international criminals to have in their package would be uncut diamonds (carbon), and to disguise them by mixing in with a pack of scorched almonds or similar (also mostly carbon & oxygen).
[...]
Similarly most drugs are not detectable by X-ray machines, but they do have sniffer dogs at airports!

Diamonds (and drugs) are non metallic.  So, as long as the airports are using simple metal detectors for people, then it would be possible to carry them on (or in) one's body.  The new whole-body scanners may not be at a high enough power to pick up non-metallic stuff in the GI tract.
Logged
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Things that block x-ray imaging at airport customs ?
« Reply #19 on: 29/11/2011 14:11:32 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/11/2011 21:24:24
""Two different energies" implies a fairly efficient monochromator, and effectively a pair of monochromatic scans."
Or it implies two different acceleration voltages and "optimistic" writing.


I believe most airport X-ray baggage scanners use a wide bandwidth source and a dual energy detector, which allows the separation of the high and low-energy X-rays.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How does bleach bleach things?

Started by thedocBoard Chemistry

Replies: 1
Views: 4626
Last post 23/10/2012 16:30:09
by thedoc
How does "silica gel" keep things dry?

Started by chrisBoard Chemistry

Replies: 7
Views: 15869
Last post 22/12/2006 11:20:37
by daveshorts
Why does cling film cling to things?

Started by chrisBoard Chemistry

Replies: 1
Views: 5130
Last post 19/11/2010 11:06:48
by imatfaal
..." and the winner of the most absorbent things is..............."

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 27
Views: 19848
Last post 13/05/2007 06:52:01
by Karen W.
Do we know that Dark Matter and Dark Energy are different things?

Started by Fluid_thinkerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 3509
Last post 02/04/2009 12:51:13
by Vern
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.272 seconds with 83 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.