The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?

  • 28 Replies
  • 14514 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #20 on: 27/04/2012 02:26:30 »
Quote from: Airthumbs on 27/04/2012 01:20:31
So to sum this all up, Engine breaking is good for fuel economy and will help your breaks last longer?

Yes. In fact, you could save a lot of money by only using the engine as a brake (as long as you only want to go down hills).
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline Nizzle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 963
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Extropian by choice!
    • View Profile
    • Carnivorous Plants
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #21 on: 27/04/2012 06:32:27 »
Quote from: Geezer on 26/04/2012 18:16:13
Quote from: Nizzle on 26/04/2012 06:56:57
[joke]How about full throttle in reverse gear for reducing stopping distance in emergency cases?  ::) [/joke]

Actually, that would reduce your stopping distance if you could ever get the tires to spin backwards - it would work like a dragster in reverse.

I know it works in theory, but don't try to shift in reverse when doing anything above 20 Km/h, unless you have a somewhat decent amount of money you were otherwise going to throw away anyway :)
Logged
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Most poems rhyme,
but this one doesn't
 

Offline Mazurka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #22 on: 27/04/2012 16:29:25 »
The current advice in the UK is to slow down when approaching junctions using the brakes, rather than relying on engine braking. 

This is not for any physical/ mechanical reasons, but because your brake lights let other road users know that you are decelerating...
Logged
 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #23 on: 27/04/2012 19:46:42 »
Quote from: Mazurka on 27/04/2012 16:29:25
The current advice in the UK is to slow down when approaching junctions using the brakes, rather than relying on engine braking. 

This is not for any physical/ mechanical reasons, but because your brake lights let other road users know that you are decelerating...
tap pedal & light worx, but how if 4 fluid circulations in tranny & engine?
Logged
 

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5064
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 64 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #24 on: 27/04/2012 20:14:55 »
"Actually, that would reduce your stopping distance if you could ever get the tires to spin backwards - it would work like a dragster in reverse."
No it would not spinning the wheels would lead to reduced adhesion the best braking effect is acheived when the wheels are are still rotating at a rate appropriate for the speed of the vehicle.


Logged
syhprum
 



Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #25 on: 27/04/2012 20:37:39 »
Quote from: syhprum on 27/04/2012 20:14:55
"Actually, that would reduce your stopping distance if you could ever get the tires to spin backwards - it would work like a dragster in reverse."
No it would not spinning the wheels would lead to reduced adhesion the best braking effect is acheived when the wheels are are still rotating at a rate appropriate for the speed of the vehicle.




That's true when only a braking force is being applied, but when the wheels are spinning in the opposite direction, you are applying a thrust in a direction opposite to the direction of travel. It works like a reverse thruster of sorts. (It probably would make the vehicle incredibly unstable too!)
« Last Edit: 27/04/2012 21:59:45 by Geezer »
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline CZARCAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 686
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #26 on: 28/04/2012 15:15:22 »
does the engine/tranny fluids experience a beneficial overflush due to downgearing?
Logged
 

Offline CycleGuy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 13
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #27 on: 04/08/2015 03:03:54 »
Quote from: syhprum on 27/04/2012 20:14:55
"Actually, that would reduce your stopping distance if you could ever get the tires to spin backwards - it would work like a dragster in reverse."
No it would not spinning the wheels would lead to reduced adhesion the best braking effect is acheived when the wheels are are still rotating at a rate appropriate for the speed of the vehicle.

Actually, the best traction is achieved with some wheel slippage. Racers use this knowledge all the time. The problem is, after you reach this maximum traction:wheel slippage ratio, the traction falls off, which puts you into a slide (in a turn) or just smokes your tires (in straight line acceleration) or puts you into a skid (when braking). The trick is to ride as close as possible to the ideal ratio, without going over it.
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/5838/why-does-a-tire-produce-more-traction-when-sliding-slightly [nofollow]
« Last Edit: 04/08/2015 03:12:59 by CycleGuy »
Logged
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1379
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 55 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it better to use the engine to decelerate?
« Reply #28 on: 05/08/2015 18:10:04 »
Quote from: lunar11 on 19/04/2012 20:55:16
When I am driving my car and approach traffic lights when they are red, I often change down gears and allow the engine to 'do the braking' hence preserving my brakes. However, when changing down gears and subsequently slowing down the RPM (revolutions per minute) increase, though I am not pressing the accelerator. Will this still increase my fuel consumption, eventhough I am slowing down.
Should I avoid doing this practice and just apply the brakes earlier and wear them out sooner?

On virtually all modern cars, revving the engine up like this uses NO fuel at all; there's a fuel cut off that kicks in when you have your foot off the accelerator and when the revs are just above idle.

If you're slowing down, what you should do is keep the highest gear you can so as to keep the revs above about 1000 rpm and start slowing as early as possible.

It's surprising how much fuel you will save doing this-it can improve your mpg by maybe 3 or 4.

Using the brakes usually means your foot isn't on the accelerator, so the same thing applies, however the fuel cut-off will be happening for a shorter time.

You can even do this with automatics, if you use the gear selector, but I wouldn't recommend you try it if there's someone behind you or on a bend; braking can be a bit abrupt!
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

What does "torque" mean in a engine?

Started by chrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 26
Views: 26954
Last post 16/08/2009 01:20:45
by krytie75
The best space simulator in history - Space Engine

Started by goldenfortBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 1278
Last post 02/07/2019 15:15:31
by chris
What alternative compressed gas source could run this "Green Steam Engine?"

Started by Karen W.Board Technology

Replies: 8
Views: 7083
Last post 15/06/2008 16:05:22
by lyner
Can thermal mass of piston engine change dynamically for improved Carnot cycle?

Started by peppercornBoard Technology

Replies: 2
Views: 4010
Last post 02/11/2010 10:43:56
by peppercorn
Could a S.I. engine use inlet manifold air temp to control the charge mass-flow?

Started by peppercornBoard Technology

Replies: 11
Views: 7523
Last post 08/09/2010 11:32:25
by peppercorn
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.204 seconds with 59 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.