The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Do we scale models properly?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Do we scale models properly?

  • 12 Replies
  • 5793 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Do we scale models properly?
« on: 12/05/2012 07:01:34 »
OK - so I still play with toy trains. Get over it!

Here's the thing:

In the US, and most of Europe, a common model scale is HO, and the scale ratio from the real thing is 1:87. Due to a lot of history, the UK (mostly) landed on OO, which has a ratio of 1:76

Now, 1:76 against 1:87 does not seem like that much of a difference, but when you compare the same original modeled in both scales side by side, the difference seems to be far greater.

Is our perception of scale based on volume? If so, should we cube the difference in ratios?


Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #1 on: 12/05/2012 08:22:34 »
You're in luck.

All you need to find is 1/76 scale models of the 4'1" or 4'0" gauge railways, and they should come out just about right.  [;)]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rail_gauges#Medium_gauge

MetricStdCountryRR1/87 width1/76 width
1,435 mm4 ft 8 ˝ in   About 60% of Worlds RailwaysStandard Guage16.49mm18.88mm
1,245 mm  4 ft 1 inEnglandMiddleton Railway, pre 188114.31mm16.38mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inWalesPadarn Railway (1842–1961)14.01mm16.04mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inWalesSaundersfoot Railway (1829–1939)14.01mm16.04mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inScotlandGlasgow Subway, Falkirk (1905–1936)14.01mm16.04mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inEnglandFurzebrook Railway (c.1830–1957)14.01mm16.04mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inEnglandRedruth and Chasewater Railway (1826–1915)14.01mm16.04mm
1,219 mm  4 ft 0 inNew ZealandWellington tramway system: electric trams, system closed 1964.14.01mm16.04mm
Logged
 

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #2 on: 12/05/2012 17:23:21 »
Ah yes, but (most) UK models are built to OO scale, but the track is really HO scale! It's not a big deal really, but it does look a bit unrealistic.

It's been that way for about sixty years, and it wasn't really a problem, because the UK railway system was isolated from Europe, so there were very few instances of mixed equipment operating on both sides of the channel. However, that situation is rapidly changing.

I have proposed to the UK community that it adopt a "sliding scale" based on the age of the prototypes so that OO would, over time, merge into HO. It's already half way there because of the track.

My proposal was not appreciated!
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #3 on: 14/05/2012 01:20:27 »
Well, this one really lit up the switchboard! :)
 
It's really intended to be a (sort of) serious question about how we perceive things. Does using a one-dimensional ratio really give a true sense of what we perceive, or do we in fact perceive "scale" as more of a three dimensional ratio?
 
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #4 on: 16/05/2012 07:24:55 »
Yes & No

You may be right, for a space filling model, perhaps one should judge it by volume.

Consider a 50% model of a 10x10x10 cube (very exciting, I know), with a total volume of 1000 units.

If you go by length, then the resulting 50% model would result in a 5x5x5 cube, with a total volume of 125 units, or 1/8 of the above, or (˝×˝×˝).

If you tried to make it half the volume, then the length of side would be 6e6f440da4aacca706144efe69411cc1.gif x L
Or, about  0.7937 x L, or nearly 80% of the original length.

So, setting three proportional cars next to each other.  The one that is 50% of the volume would be 80% of the length of the original.  The one that is 50% of the length of the original would be only about 12.5% of the original volume.

Which is best?

Apparently it gets much more complicated when making model aircraft, because lift is a function of Wing area (square), Cord Length (linear), and Velocity (Should velocity be reduced?).
Volume, and in many senses, mass, of course, is a cubic measurement.
Is drag proportional to the fontal area (a square)?

Anyway, to calculate the aerodynamics of the scale model, you have to incorporate linear measurements, square measurements, and cubic measurements. 

Large ships, of course, have a "hull speed" which is a linear measurement.  Yet displacement, and most other quantities are cubics.


Logged
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #5 on: 16/05/2012 16:46:38 »
This reminds me of the experiments that show that people tend to misjudge the amount of liquid in glasses depending on the shape of the glass.  They tend to overestimate the amount in tall, skinny glasses as opposed to short, wide glasses. 

I guess what this means is that people (at least somewhat) extrapolate volumes from linear dimensions. 
Logged
 

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #6 on: 16/05/2012 17:31:28 »
Yes - it's a bit weird.

For example, a 10% increase in scale (linear) does not sound like very much, but when you compare a two 3-D models, the difference seems much greater, which probably is not surprising because the volume has actually increased by 33%

As Clifford points out, dimensional scaling is only one aspect of the problem. Physical effects can't really be scaled.


Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #7 on: 17/05/2012 03:39:12 »
Yikes!  If the physics scaled linearly you'd be in trouble.  To run your model train, you'd have to use ~1/87th of the power needed to drive an actual train!  From a back of the envelope calculation (~1000 horsepower full sized train, 1/100th scale locomotive, and google conversion from hp to watts) you'd be running at ~7500 watts!
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #8 on: 17/05/2012 04:13:12 »
Quote from: JP on 17/05/2012 03:39:12
Yikes!  If the physics scaled linearly you'd be in trouble.  To run your model train, you'd have to use ~1/87th of the power needed to drive an actual train!  From a back of the envelope calculation (~1000 horsepower full sized train, 1/100th scale locomotive, and google conversion from hp to watts) you'd be running at ~7500 watts!
Ahhh...
All you need is Tim the Toolman Taylor...  to build you a super powered 7.5 KW micro bullet train  ;)
Logged
 



Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #9 on: 17/05/2012 04:29:09 »
Quote from: JP on 17/05/2012 03:39:12
Yikes!  If the physics scaled linearly you'd be in trouble.  To run your model train, you'd have to use ~1/87th of the power needed to drive an actual train!  From a back of the envelope calculation (~1000 horsepower full sized train, 1/100th scale locomotive, and google conversion from hp to watts) you'd be running at ~7500 watts!

I think the rails would glow red hot and fuse! And 1000HP is a conservative estimate. The real things can produce several thousand kW. Scaling 3000kW by the cube of the 87 ratio gives about 4.5W which is actually pretty close to the power output of the electric motor in the model.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 

Offline Geezer (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #10 on: 17/05/2012 04:35:25 »
I may have to complain to the NMRA that they are misrepresenting HO scale by more than a few orders of magnitude.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force ćther.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1185
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #11 on: 20/05/2012 14:49:40 »
I saw a train model for sale near me, but at 1.7m long the loco is a little big to fit in my room. The price is a big ouch too, around 1200 pounds.
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8975
  • Activity:
    75.5%
  • Thanked: 882 times
    • View Profile
Re: Do we scale models properly?
« Reply #12 on: 02/06/2012 10:42:18 »
To properly scale the wind resistance, you would need to operate the model in a fluid other than air...
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are we now taking part in a large scale field trial of the Oxford vaccine?

Started by Colin2BBoard COVID-19

Replies: 4
Views: 226
Last post 02/01/2021 11:05:48
by alancalverd
QotW - 09.04.26 - Do magnets remove lime scale from water pipes?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 72
Views: 85289
Last post 16/11/2015 12:53:24
by vhfpmr
Is there a scale for gravity versus the speed of time in General Relativity ?

Started by gemBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 2636
Last post 16/04/2010 19:44:27
by gem
How does altering a smart phone's gray-scale on help with battery life?

Started by McKayBoard Technology

Replies: 3
Views: 14134
Last post 29/12/2014 21:50:34
by zacsaturday
Can you recommend a small-scale hydroelectric turbine generator?

Started by esseffgeeBoard Technology

Replies: 3
Views: 2525
Last post 05/10/2015 11:07:38
by ProjectSailor
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.696 seconds with 67 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.