0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hey I'm not talking about time .the time part I think r right it don't mean its gravity .im talking about gravity having a logical reason .the moon is 1/4 the size of earth and 60% the denity of earth but only 1/6 of earth gravity so If gravity is based on mass the moons gravity should be 60% of earths or at less 1/4 of earth .but it's not
so to me that shows the moons core is working at a different rate meaning gravity has highs and lows not doing with mass but with the working of that mass at that time witch mean bigger is better if at full power
again we have seen with stars blowing up it turn into a 0 like mass body
but with gravity supercharge in stead stopping shows it's to do with the working of the mass not just coz it's there .
when I talk about a active core I'm talking about us making a real life mini core with its own gravity.
u can't just turn something like that on with out it being in control state with rules and safety ...I would be happy to talk to about my gravity idea but not on a blog .coz the truth with the internet people can be who ever and I don't think just anyone should be aball to just test a real active core ..... And yes we can't get to the core .thats my point it's hard to tell but what I'm say is it missing the last peace witch makes it logical as matters and works with it
If I was to talk about it .i would go back to bacis .it would even give a idea what is going on in a black hole coz it works with thing we know work around us .i thought it for the ground up with my learning testing it and it keeps working ..... My theroy about the moon was under current theory's and not on a more logical reason
I know everything about spacetime test r getting results but I thing if they where to take gravity out of spacetime and into a produce of matter .some things was make sense with only being what is gravity the main missing key
... the moon is 1/4 the size of earth and 60% the denity of earth but only 1/6 of earth gravity so If gravity is based on mass the moons gravity should be 60% of earths or at less 1/4 of earth
The images on the left came from a map of Mercury. On the right are ones from the Moon.
Ok it's starting to get hard with out giving In site to my theroy ... But first my core idea I'm not trying to talk much about coz not coz it won't work but I do believe the safes place to test in is in space and maybe with 2 more around earth to balance the afect of there gravity
That should convince any reasonable person that corresponding patterns on the moon and other bodies are not due to the moon colliding with them. However I doubt it will convince MOON TRUTH who has recently gone completely round the bend : late October 2013 they posted the YouTube below claiming the the plot of a Japanese children's cartoon now is confirmation of their moon-hits-earth theory ...
... under my theroy it would also make everything circular and recycling at all levels
Some warning signs of crackpot ...6. Claims discovery of new physical theories, or comprehensive "theories of everything"
Probably unfair to insinuate that someone is a crackpot just because they have a new theory...
I know u r going ask me question ,and that's good but this theory is from the ground up basses on bacis . Going on the simple reason is most likely right reason