Certainly it is very apparent that the Fibonacci and the Golden Mean seem to be solidified principles from both the micro levels (For instance: "clock cycle of brain waves;" the "human genome DNA" and even at the "atomic scale.") as well at the macro level.

"Adolf Zeising wrote in 1854 of a UNIVERSAL LAW "in which is contained the ground-principle of all formative striving for beauty and completeness in the realms of both nature and art, and which permeates,... all structures, forms and proportions, whether cosmic or individual, organic or inorganic, acoustic or optical; which finds its fullest realization, however, in the human form.".

Thus indeed! I believe that two spatial and mathematic patterns are very relevant to the physics discussion.

However, the observation of these phenomena, as well, even the subsequent mathematical sentences describing them as evidential, fail to explain HOW these patterns are produced. As well! WHY these patterns are evident relative to the functionality of "things." Furthermore the question of "WHAT" (processes or functionalities) produces these relevant and consistent patterns is not so transparent or explained either.

The principles of science compel us to go beyond just the mere observation of a phenomenon or pattern. We tend to observe things followed by a seeming complacency; as if merely witnessing "patterns" is sufficient.(Thus: Casual acknowledgment due many times to mans inability to understand or comprehend the reasons behind the patterns). What I am saying is that the precepts of science encourage one to go beyond 'just' observing but to seek to explain and define the "WHY,HOW and WHAT" relative to the observations. We all know that the Fib. and Golden Mean are observed relative to scientific and mathematical scrutiny. Yet! Have we defined why these patterns are found ( what is driving these consistent phenomenon)? Have we expressed fully ( through scientific and mathematical language) the answers to these questions, fully and appropriately?

The occasional( or frequent) allusions to architecture ( and other man-made... "art") as expressions of these patterns do not do justice to such profound mathematical principles as consistent. Neither references to the "Parthenon" nor the combined imagery(art) as found on google ( related to the "golden mean")really contributes to or expound upon the phenomenon themselves as evident all around us. Save archaic reminiscing.

When we see a golden rectangle drawn as a 1-dim image (geometric shape) we proclaim that such is a human discovery and that it is very interesting( to say the least!). We then redundantly "talk about it" by discussing 'rabbits/sunflowers/flower pedals." We the draw the pattern out as it is written mathematically( 1 1 2 3 5 ......). We admire it! Some go so far as to revere it (mysticize it) without knowing much about it. Why do we take such a lackadaisical approach? Such is more convenient than REALLY applying ourselves toward discerning its relevance.

A 1-dim. rectangle 'scribbled' on a sheet of paper tells us nothing; save the elegance of it. We extend our 1-dim view a little farther by 'chopping the first rectangle off' so as to view a smaller version of the same thing ( the same PHENOMENON) We "develop methods" and then "incorporate" these trivial methods so as to: Draw another shape!? I see this as scientific and mathematical tangency. We are not progressing toward a more complete and reconciliatory understanding of it. It would seem that we are relegating the phenomenon. Why?

(Note: One large rectangle changes to a smaller rectangle to a smaller…into infinity. Does this smack of “mirror to mirror” …”continual symmetry?”)

I perceive that one of the reasons is found in that we have taken a seeming 1-dim approach to the problem ( Almost all inclusively; whether scientifically, intellectually or mathematically). We need to begin applying "A" principle that is innate to humankind. This would be accomplished if we realize that any object, idea or thing viewed is better explained by taking a 3-dim approach. ( Perhaps even a multi-dim. approach). Is it possible to understand these phenomena more effectively by departing from the a set way of thinking about the problem" and begin to study them from more broad, and unorthodox perspectives? Is it possible to define the underlying principles ( followed by applications of principles so derived) by changing our perspective(s) and becoming RESOLVED to figure the problem out. If we are decided in this regard then perhaps a more robust view of these patterns is warranted. Perhaps we need to start looking at the golden rectangle from a more 3-dim. mindset. (From many different angles and many different orthodox/unorthodox..relative veiws)

The golden rectangle, as drawn and observed on paper, remotely leads one to any resolute understanding of it. It is merely a 1-dim. representation consisting of thin lines and empty space. Yet what is REALLY happening through the thickness of the rectangle? How is the "space" inside the lines, and as separated by other lines,defined? What explains the relativity of' the "mass lines" ( or argumentatively "mass numbers" relative to the fib. sequence) relative to the empty space? We are starting to alter our predisposed way of seeing the picture and now are beginning to "think" of the problem more 3.dim.

What would the golden rectangle look like if it were "drawn" or even animated in a 3-dim. way? We already know ( right?). W have concluded that it would look something like a sunflower or flower pedals ( mathematically numbered). Or: Perhaps it would look like something/EVERYTHING else. Perhaps we would describe what it looks like and subsequently derive from the observations and experiments something called TOE..The Theory of Everything!

This is the point!

In no way have we explained nore defined appropriately a phenomenon that seems to demonstrate itself irrefutably relative to everything. In no way does reverence for an 'undefined mysterious geometry'("UMG"...lol) or pattern produce any solid explanatory results. In no way does mathematics fully translate the phenomenon into their language, methodologies and equations. So where do we look for the answers? This seems to be a quandary of epoch proportions. This regardless of how humans in many ways relegate its importance relating to (literally) an understanding of the universe and nature physic.

: There is a very unique and insightful way to start looking at these phenomena. There is a way to start looking at the problem from a new ( revolutionary?) perspective.

This thread is designed to present the TOE way of looking at the problem.

I will present some things ( in brevity) with regard to the golden ratio in succeeding posts. I will show a unique way ( language) as well that when utilized assists us in 'visualizing" the fib sequence through: Mathematics! I will introduce a unique 'mathematical language'( full of terms, expressions and information) derived from discoveries innate to spatial temporal reasoning and many years of arduous study into the "mirror effect."

Questions

-From where does the FIB. Sequence originate."( "from where from what place")?

-Why is it discovered "virtually everywhere"(TOE) and relative to "virtually everything"(TOE)

-How does this "sequence' occur?

-How does this sequence relate to everything? (TOE)

-HOW and WHY is the sequence... sequestered? (Two slit experiment!)

-What is the phenomenon exactly and what results in its dissemination (infinitely) throughout the universe?

- Does IT explain TIME? Those " Sequence"("seconds"), minutes and hours that we sit at our tables in silent introspection trying to comprehend it?

-When did these phenomenon's first "become" what they are; as relevant to both the earth as well the universe?

-What is being "said" by the phenomenon ( if it could speak). What "statements" would be made by the phenomenon if described and understood?

- What story or history would it reveal to us, anthropomorphically speaking?

Is the Golden ratio to be discovered within whole language systems; Languages and alphabets comprised of letters, accompanied by corresponding sounds.. Is Language representative of an intelligent means, utilized by human thinkers, to translate both light photon and sound INFORMATION to qualitative symbols and meaning?

This thread will also introduce new patterns(many) that will, on their own merit, speak further on our individual and collective.....TOE.... pursuit.

Look closely at the accompanying picture illustrations. I will begin to explain the picture in proceeding posts.