0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The problem is that "whirly photons" are usually introduced to match previous experimental results and we can always invent theories to match experiment after the fact.
I haven't seen a "whirly photon" model that predicts new results that we can experimentally check to verify the theory.
Two-photons-whirl can explain the relation between hadron’s mass and hadron’s spin in a rather trivial way. Two-photons-whirl can explain inertia in unprecedented way.Two-photons-whirl theory can explain why stars explode (currently, explanation for that does not exist, only assumptions)Two-photons-whirl theory can explain and simply, accurately and precisely derive relativity and gravity, that is, it can unify the physics. That cannot be done with any other theory.That what enables the two-photons-whirl theory explains the observed and measured rotational velocity distribution of bodies which constitute galaxies. Without the need for any misterious matter-forms.That what enables the two-photons-whirl theory explains the accelerated universe expansion, without the need for any misterious forms of energy.And, the two-photons-whirl theory is simple, acurate, reasonable, easily comprehensible, and it can explain everything. One man cannot write all that. One man can set the clear bases for that, and make several crucial steps. And that can then be developed by much, much less number of men than the number of them who were/are engaged on the investigation and development of the current branches of fundamental physics.