The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The total rest energy of all the matter in the observable universe
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
The total rest energy of all the matter in the observable universe
0 Replies
1367 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
emaroun
(OP)
First timers
2
Activity:
0%
The total rest energy of all the matter in the observable universe
«
on:
30/11/2012 16:09:29 »
What does the Lambda-CDM model say about the initial mass-energy of the universe and what does Maroun say?
We were hoping to find the quantity of the initial mass of the cosmos through “Einstein’s radius of the universe”:
r = (constant#r) / ( d ^ 1/2 ) … (1)
(constant#r) = c / ( 4 pi G ) ^ 1/2
r: Einstein’s radius of the universe
d: Density of the space of the universe
c: The speed of light constant
G: The Newtonian gravitational constant
pi = 3.14159
and by favoring a sphere universe, the volume of the universe ( V ) is given by the formula:
V = 4/3 pi r^3 … (2)
Finally, we get the final result by applying the formula:
m = V d … (3)
m: The mass-energy of the universe
Cosmology substitutes Planck length as the initial radius of the universe ( r0 ) in eq #1, remember that r0 = 10^-35 m.
As a result d0 = 10^97 kg/m^3
And V0 = 10^-105 m^3
This makes m0 = 10^-8 kg, or a consequence equals Planck mass
So the outcome of m0: The initial mass of the universe from Einstein’s radius of the universe is wrong and makes no sense because the quantity 10^-8 kg is too big for the subatomic scale universe, but we get correct results by applying the current radius of the universe ( r2 ) which approximately equals around 10^25 m.
Substituting r2 in eq #1 gives a final mass of m2 = 10^52 kg.
m2: The estimated total mass-energy of the observable universe
Anyway, I did the clean work in physics and cosmology, and I found a formula that applies at the subatomic and the large scale at the same time, a formula that sets m0 and m2 in one theory that can be called the theory of everything.
In contrast with the Lambda-CDM, my theory works everywhere and at any moment. Maroun’s equations share the same results with the modern theories on the large scale universe, but we know that the Lambda-CDM fails in the subatomic scale.
I found out that:
m2 = 10^52 kg.
m0 = 10^-38 kg.
This is by using my discovery of the general formula of the universe.
m = constant ( t ^ 3 ) ^ 1/2
constant = c^3 / G * (1/t2)^1/2
t: Time which is determined through the interval [ t0, t2 ]
t2: The instant age of the universe at this moment according to the big bang theory
t0: Planck time constant
Remember that r0 = c t0
- What is the amount of energy released in the Big Bang?
I value Dr. Gerald Schroeder opinion, and I keep in mind that the Jews are the first masters of the Bible after God: when a Jewish master explains science, you will understand that cosmology does not contradict the Bible.
I hope this was good introduction !
Maroun complete picture of the universe & the equations of all times (a solution for the initial state of the universe).
Maroun general formula of the cosmos unifies the subatomic universe with the large scale. Through my equations, where I consider the law of conservation of energy, you can calculate the quantity of the total observable mass-energy of the universe at any moment (this includes dark matter and dark energy). The universe has a constant amount of total mass-energy (EC) that is equal to the total observable mass-energy at this moment (which is known as the “age of the universe”). It is true that the universe has a constant amount of mass-energy, but virtually, the physical quantities of the observable universe are changing and here I introduce a set of equations to estimate them.
Sincerely,
Essam Maroun
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...