The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?

  • 4 Replies
  • 2806 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« on: 31/01/2013 12:31:01 »
Studying a substance produced by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) has revealed a powerful new therapeutic anti-viral avenue.

Read the whole story on our website by clicking here

  
« Last Edit: 31/01/2013 12:31:01 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« Reply #1 on: 31/01/2013 14:32:40 »
It sounds a lot like computer viruses which are often programmed to disable the antivirus programs. 

So, the idea is to flood the cells with this binding site, giving the virus false targets to bind to?  Assuming that one can get the protein fragments into the cells.

Perhaps also non protein drugs could be produced to bind this viral protein.

If this one protein is so critical for pathogens to bind to, I could imagine an approach to gene therapy in which the protein itself is altered, and thus the diseases that attack that protein would need to re-evolve to attack the modified protein.  Potentially it could make humans or livestock much more disease resistant.

Would there be a version of the beclin-1protein/gene from other animals, perhaps even non-mammals that would be equally effective, but difficult for human or livestock diseases to attack, without bringing in the risk of more zoonotic diseases?  And, thus one could splice the different version of the gene into the genome.
« Last Edit: 31/01/2013 14:45:50 by CliffordK »
Logged
 

Offline schneebfloob

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 49
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« Reply #2 on: 31/01/2013 18:22:06 »
"The Texas-based team discovered that the HIV-1 Nef locks onto just one part of the beclin-1 protein, so they produced a soluble, synthetic version of this small region."

Whilst this is really interesting I can't help but wonder how long it will take HIV to worm its way around this. It binds to a 'small region' of a protein receptor. How long until it mutates to bind to a different region of the same protein? This is obviously having a direct impact on the survival of HIV, it will introduce a selection pressure and HIV is extremely responsive to such things.
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6408
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« Reply #3 on: 31/01/2013 18:39:11 »
It might,
However, that may mean that the virus would have to develop a whole new protein from scratch for the new binding site, something that would not be easy to do.

That would not be nearly as easy for the virus to do as modifying one of its own proteins so that it is no longer a target for a drug.

In fact, that would be an advantage of using natural proteins to make the fake receptors as it would be impossible to for the virus to differentiate between the real and fake receptors.  If a drug was used to block the HIV-1 Nef binding agent, then it might be possible for the HIV-1 Nef to curcumvent the drug and still bind to beclin-1.

Another possible adaptation would be for the virus to start over-producing its receptor blocker to overwhelm the "fake" receptors.
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7661
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 248 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Do viruses hold the key to their own undoing?
« Reply #4 on: 19/02/2013 20:45:48 »
Actually, it's more clever than that; because the virus is switching down the rate of autophagy within the cell by deactivating an activating molecule. What the beclin-derivative peptide does is de-repress the autophagy rate, increasing the processing and virus dismantling. So it a positive effect on cell physiology, rather than a direct anti-viral effect.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Viruses and Bacteria.. What's the line between living and non-living?

Started by SeanyBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 2
Views: 12692
Last post 06/01/2009 12:32:41
by Seany
Can Viruses or malware elude hard disk format and operating system reinstall?

Started by DrQuincyBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 6
Views: 8978
Last post 27/02/2008 16:39:58
by another_someone
Are long-dormant frozen viruses and bacteria being released by global warming?

Started by manicgeekBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 3
Views: 4835
Last post 28/12/2007 17:06:03
by another_someone
Do antihistamines reduce the chances of catching mosquito born viruses?

Started by thedocBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 1
Views: 1793
Last post 09/07/2016 13:32:05
by exothermic
Any thoughts on (vanishing) glaciers as repositories for viruses and bacteria?

Started by DiscoverDaveBoard Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

Replies: 2
Views: 3604
Last post 26/02/2010 18:32:57
by Spannerman
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.