What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?

  • 1733 Replies
  • 320237 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #500 on: 09/10/2013 10:37:36 »
Many religious scientists have attempted to reconcile science and religion, but I suspect Don Quixote's  proposed"paradigm shift" is an attempt to turn the clock back to an essentially medieval view of reality in which materialist science infringes on God's prerogative to alter reality in any way He sees fit.
I'm sure he'll deny it, but that's the way it comes across. Medieval mysicism & magic substituting for materialism. For 'science', read 'alchemy and incantation' ;)
« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 10:43:45 by dlorde »

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #501 on: 09/10/2013 10:43:28 »
I'd write more cranky responses, but the Northern lights are going crazy here!
I wish I could see them from here, but we're too far south in the southern UK...

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #502 on: 09/10/2013 17:32:24 »
Question: Why can you never trust an atom?

Because they make up everything!

Hahahahaha.I crack myself up.  Sorry, just a little materialist humor.  And yes I stole that joke.

_Why can you never trust materialists ?
_Because they deliberately have been deceiving    and  lying to the people in the name of science,since the 19th century at least  .
Because materialists have been chronic centuries -long ...liars , deceivers .......in the name of science ..............

« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 18:23:02 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #503 on: 09/10/2013 17:53:31 »
The Northern Lights have unfortunately dimmed a bit. So in the mean time, I've been searching for "science proper" on the internet, and strangely found nothing except for a question on a forum by someone named Shibboleth.

Although my knowledge of Islam is quite limited, it doesn't seem that scientists working in traditionally Islamic countries are rabid anti-materialists.

I think scientists working in Africa,Asia, the middle East, or South America, would not consider science, or empirically based, materialist scientific methodology, to be the domain of Eurocentric White devils trying to brain wash them or impose a false misconception of science upon them. The Renaissance in Europe was a long time ago, and many countries and ethnic groups have contributed to materialist scientific findings before and after, often at great personal threat to their safety by religious fundamentalists in their geographical area. The idea that materialism stems from Jesuit tradition is certainly questionable. The Jesuit tradition, as I understand it, (and I'm not Cathothic,) was simply that education had a civilizing effect on people which was overall beneficial . Some Catholic priests may have been more educated than the average person at the time; they knew Latin, and could read, they had time and income to think about science, but they pursued certain scientific findings at their own peril.
But even in Europe, early scientists, who were not associated with the church, like Galileo, or amateur scientists like Leeuwenhoek who looked at semen under a microscope, risked their lives communicating their "materialist"  observations to others. Undoubtably, scientists in Islamic countries encountered the same opposition.

Many religious scientists have attempted to reconcile science and religion, but I suspect Don Quixote's  proposed"paradigm shift" is an attempt to turn the clock back to an essentially medieval view of reality in which materialist science infringes on God's prerogative to alter reality in any way He sees fit.

You do absolutely not know what you're talking about , love :
Don't project your own Eurocentric heritage  , indoctrinations and brainwash on other cultures , religions, thoughtstreams ...please :  materialism was the product of those special Eurocentric cultural philosophic economic social religious ....medieval circumstances that were / are particular to Europe or to the west only = not universal .
See the very certain Islamic origin of the scientific method itself , that did originate directly from the Qur'anic epistemology , i did open a whole topic about .
It was religious extremism mainly , that's obviously alien to Islam itself , that had made the early muslims abandon science , knowledge in the boroader sense ....a historic fact which resulted in their well-deserved decline .
Science is a religious duty in Islam, a form of worship of God ,so, the early muslims who did "invent " and practice the scientific method ,for the first time ever in mankind's history ,thanks to that Qur'anic epistemology they used to interiorize so well  thus ,  by not only laying its philosophic theoretical epistemological and practical foundations , but they also did actively practice it , in full awareness of what the scientific method thus meant on both the abstract and the reality ground .
Those early muslims used to separate science from Islam in the process of course , while trying to get a holistic synthesis from both afterwards :

See that topic of mine on the subject : " What is the real origin of the scientific method ? " in science forums ...:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=48315.0

See this as well , while you are at it :

www.muslimheritage.com
www.1001inventions.com

Science and Islam as the both sides of the same coin , they are necessary to each other , need each other , complete each other ...........

P.S.: The ancient Greek thought was not only unscientific , but was aslo hostile to science , despite all those ancient Greek 'scientists " ' contributions to science , the latter were just the exceptions to the rule who were "practicing  Science " without having any idea about the scientific method as such , or about its epistemological philosophic theoretical basis ....The same goes for all those ancient Egyptian, Indian, Chinese , Babylonian ........."scientists " ....
Aristotle , for example , used to talk about sense perception, observation, experience, and even induction ...as valid sources of knowledge , but that was just abstract talk that was never practiced on the reality ground :
Aristotle said, for example , once that women had more teeth than men haha , but he never bothered himself to verify that  funny extraordinary claim of his empirically ...see this great epistemological study on the subject + on the above as well :  via google search : free download pdf link = a relatively short concise bright essay you can download for free , first link with PDF lablel:

https://www.google.com/#q=the+islamic+impact+on+western+civilization+reconsidered+by+koshul.pdf

In short :
The Islamic impact on western civilization was so far reaching , as Briffault said ,that above mentioned essay tried to prove to be true , the islamic impact thus on western civilization was so far reaching that there was no single aspect of western growth that could not be traced back to those islamic impacts .
The Islamic impact on western civilization was in fact so far reaching that it did also originate the scientific method itself ,or science itself ..............

Besides, western thought was just an extension of the original Islamic one , western thought that has been taking since its own materialist and other paths though .........
Materialism  as an Eurocentric ideology and false conception of nature , or as a primitive backward degenerate -form-of-christianity secular religion has been making you ,westerners , even dumber , despite all those huge advances of science proper at the level of matter or at the level of material physical and biological processes , materialism had/has absolutely nothing to do with those scientific advances  .............
Materialism in all sciences , in art , literature ...that has been exported to the rest of the world ,thanks to western global domination and power ,is totally alien to those non-western cultures, societies .............
 





.................


Excerpts from "Science Set Free ..." By Sheldrake : Chapter 12 : Scientific Futures :
In other words : dear westerners : you'd better try to get rid of that Eurocentric outdated primitive backward orthodox materialist false secular religion in science, otherwise , you will find yourselves suddenly way behind the rest of the world at the level of the sciences , in plural, at least : you are warned :



The sciences are entering a new phase. The materialist ideology that has ruled them since the
nineteenth century is out of date. All ten of its essential doctrines have been superseded. The
authoritarian structure of the sciences, the illusions of objectivity and the fantasies of omniscience
have all outlived their usefulness.
The sciences will have to change for another reason too: they are now global. Mechanistic science
and the materialist ideology grew up in Europe, and were strongly influenced by the religious disputes
that obsessed Europeans from the seventeenth century onward. But these preoccupations are alien to
cultures and traditions in many other parts of the world.
In 2011, the worldwide expenditure on scientific and technological research and development was
more than $1,000 billion, of which China spent $100 billion.1 Asian countries, especially China and
India, now produce enormous numbers of science and engineering graduates. In 2007, at BSc level
there were 2.5 million science and engineering graduates in India and 1.5 million in China,2 compared
with 515,000 in the United States3 and 100,000 in the UK.4 In addition, many of those studying in the
United States and Europe are from other countries: in 2007, nearly a third of the graduate students in
science and engineering in the United States were foreign, with the majority from India, China and
Korea.5
Yet the sciences as taught in Asia, Africa, the Islamic countries and elsewhere are still packaged in
an ideology shaped by their European past. Materialism gains its persuasive power from the
technological applications of science. But the successes of these applications do not prove that this
ideology is true. Penicillin will go on killing bacteria, jet planes will keep on flying and mobile
telephones will still work if scientists move on to wider views of nature.
No one can foresee how the sciences will evolve, but I believe recognizing that “science” is not one
thing will facilitate their development. “Science” has given way to “the sciences.” By moving beyond
physicalism, the status of physics has changed. By freeing the sciences from the ideology of
materialism, new opportunities for debate and dialogue open up, and so do new possibilities for
research.

« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 18:29:40 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #504 on: 09/10/2013 18:37:15 »
"Casting pearls before ...swine ", no offense , as David Cooper so eloquently metaphorically ironically said earlier indeed:

So much for  our so-called "rational logical scientific  community "  here , my ass , excuse my French , Dutch , English or Arabic ...................
An utter total waste of time ....

My dear fellow, Don Q,

You are casting your pearls before swine. I think you should write all this stuff up as a proper book and make it available on the Kindle where it can be read more comfortably and without being derailed repeatedly by other people with their ludicrous objections.

Nice subtle irony of yours haha , that does have some elements of truth , ironically enough : "DonQ" ? haha , come on .
Hi , buddy : nice to have you back, i mean it  : Philosopher Thomas Nagel is more qualified than i could ever be in that regard .
Well, despite my repeated extensive attempts to clarify my main core point concerning the facts discussed by philosopher Thomas Nagel 's " Mind and cosmos : why the materialist reductionist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false " book , these people do not seem to be able to get it yet , so, they just distort my views ,or do not understand them properly as i meant them to be at least : maybe  i was not clear enough , who knows : i did my best though , in that regard at least .
I did even post the introduction, the conclusion , chapter 3 cognition, and chapter 4 consciousness of that book here on this thread for them, in vain .
Not to mention that i also did provide a free download link to most books of Nagel on line , including to that above mentioned book of his .
I really would love to see you forget about our previous little insignificant and meaningless conflict , it was nothing in fact really ,and enrich us with your eventual insights on the subject , seriously .
I would really appreciate it , if you would tell us  your own opinions about Thomas Nagel's book ,or about the main core issue here,as follows  : 

The exclusively biological physical reductionist naturalist materialist neo_Darwinian conception of nature is false = a misconception of nature , that gotta be replaced by a more or less valid conception of nature in science = a non-reductionist naturalist one , as Nagel proposes in fact ...
Thanks , appreciate .
I really missed your significant presence -personality here and views as well , even though i do not agree with most of your world views ,regarding reductionism in science at least,and its implications for the reductionist approaches of the emergence evolution and origins of life ,the emergence evolution and origins of consciousness ... its implications for the reductionist version of evolution ...  .
Kind regards .


« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 18:44:38 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline David Cooper

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1505
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #505 on: 09/10/2013 20:10:51 »
Question: Why can you never trust an atom?

Because they make up everything!

Hahahahaha.I crack myself up.  Sorry, just a little materialist humor.  And yes I stole that joke.

I think everyone deserves that reward for reading this thread.

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #506 on: 09/10/2013 20:34:24 »
Question: Why can you never trust an atom?

Because they make up everything!

Hahahahaha.I crack myself up.  Sorry, just a little materialist humor.  And yes I stole that joke.

I think everyone deserves that reward for reading this thread.

Maybe ,if they happen to be materialists at that in fact : have better ideas ?

And no, atoms do not "make up everything" = that was just the materialist tasteless reductionist magical handicaped  false haha  materialist key-hole  "humor" = that's the whole point of this thread by the way = consciousness is not "made up" by atoms , or rather consciousness is not "made up " by some sort of (magical materialist made up)   strip-tease sexy ritual oscillations vibrations synchronizations haha ...dances of neurons or of ensemble of neurons ,as some "research " provided by some materialist dummy here "proved that to be true "  haha  ...the same goes for all the rest of those non-physical and non-biological processes such as memory , feelings , emotions, human love ,conscience , mind , human cognition  .........................
Physical chemical processes do not "make up " the non-physical and non-biological above mentioned processes , how can they ever do just that ( materialist magic) = they do not "make up " anything"  in fact for that matter , including hallucinations, delusions , fairy tales ...
That materialist   tasteless "joke " is the epitome of stupidity and lack of taste .....= an understatement thus .

P.S.:

Someone asks : how could  all the extremely rich diversity of life on earth evolve from just 1 single so-called original cell  that had suddenly and magically "emerged " from that so-called original "soup "  haha, not my mother's though , via so many "accidents "
 ?
Another answers : well, dummy : we see that happening every single day : 1 single cell (the spermatozoid fusing with the female ovule ) "gives birth" to you , to  me ..........to the rest of mankind , and to most of the rest ...

That's another silly false tasteless reductionist magical materialist "joke " = life is not a matter of just physics and chemistry ..............the latter can certainly and absolutely not account  fully  for life , its emergence evolution and origins = no way .
Plus, The so-called original cell that allegedly "gave birth" to all life  via evolution  , was most probably , if it ever existed in fact , nothing like the current cells ............
« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 21:04:29 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #507 on: 09/10/2013 21:12:02 »
Amazing how that materialist magical reductionist bullshit regarding life , consciousness , memory , feelings , emotions , human love , human cognition , human conscience ............their evolution emergence and origins , gets sold to the people as science proper , as scientific facts , or as scientific approaches ...haha = the epitome os stupidity in science and elsewhere .
Unbelievable ...............
Physics and chemistry can certainly and absolutely not account fully for those above mentioned processes , let alone for their evolution emergence or origins ...
The epitome of stupidity at the heart of science , thanks to materialism ..........
Incredibly amazing ...........
The funniest  and saddest  thing of all about this is that these folks here , and others elsewhere, including the majority of scientists , do not only take that materialist false ridiculous magical bullshit regarding the above for granted without ever questioning its "validity or truth "  , but they also make "jokes " about that hahahahahahahahah

hhhahahahhahahahah

I am speechless again haha ..............

God..............
« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 21:18:47 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #508 on: 09/10/2013 21:19:26 »
hahahahahahhahahahhahahhahaaaaaaaaa
Who laughs last , laughs best ...hahahahahahah

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #509 on: 09/10/2013 21:29:53 »
haha
What a bunch of idiots haha

No wonder that that silly materialist IQ test is a joke .
Heart's intelligence is indeed the highest form of intelligence ,the highest form of intellect : heart as no feelings , emotions, or biological organ ...

hahahahahahahahah
« Last Edit: 09/10/2013 21:33:43 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #510 on: 09/10/2013 22:04:16 »
Wow... I hope that was just an embarrassing outburst, not a public breakdown.

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #511 on: 10/10/2013 04:26:28 »
Extended Minds :




 Our experiences of our bodies are in our bodies. The feelings in my fingers are in my fingers,
not in my head. Direct experience offers no support for the extraordinary claim that all experiences
are inside brains. Direct experience is not irrelevant to the nature of consciousness: it is
consciousness.

Well, I'm glad he's not my doctor, anyway. If feeling is in the fingers and not in the brain, why would damage to the brachial nerve plexus in the shoulder, (or a stroke) cause me to lose sensation or movement in my hand? My fingers are just fine! They weren't damaged at all.

 How would one use morphic fields to explain why bright lights or plucking an eyebrow sometimes makes people sneeze? If you don't know that the branching trigeminal cranial nerve receives information from the eyes, nose and upper brow area, and the brain sometimes misinterprets information coming from one as actually coming from another area, it makes no sense. Perception and the experience of sensation is not in the fingers (or the nose in the example above) it's in the brain.

Amputees experience phantom limbs. They experience pain, itchiness, and other sensations from a limb that clearly isn't there. (Perhaps their morphic field is itchy.) Neurologists believe that over time, the part of the brain that used to control the missing arm starts to be utilized for other body parts, and curiously, patients with phantom limb pain or itchiness can often get relief by rubbing their faces, which makes sense since the region devoted to the face is right next door in the somatosensory cortex.

There's a fun experiment called the rubber hand experiment. The participant's real hand is hidden from their sight and replaced with a rubber hand. The experimenter takes two paint brushes and gently strokes the rubber hand and the hidden hand in synchrony. Participants report a bizarre feeling that rubber hand is their hand, even though rationally, they are well aware it's fake. And if the experimenter threatens the rubber hand, with say a sharp knife, or whacks it with a hammer, they reflexively jump or jerk their own hand, even though it was never in any danger.

Another tactile illusion (called the thermal grill illusion) involves temperature receptors in the skin. One kind of temperature receptor responds to cold, 10-30 degrees C. Another responds to warm temperatures, between 30 and 45 degrees C. Both sets respond to scalding hot temperatures. If you take a kitchen fork and place it in cool water, and another in warm water for several minutes, and intertwine the tines of the warm and cool forks and place them against your skin, it creates an uncomfortable burning sensation, since usually that is the only time those receptors fire together. (That's also why your ears burn and itch when you come into a warm house on a cold day)

So what? Well, Sheldrake says direct experience is everything, we should always trust it, and yet it would appear that our consciousness can be fooled rather easily.

It's one thing to ask questions about the "hard problem" of the subjective feeling of consciousness, the unified sense of self, but Sheldrake sounds like he's denying pretty much everything in basic, first year anatomy and physiology book.

ps. I'd tell you some more chemistry jokes, but I only do that periodically. Anyway, the best ones argon.
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 05:09:27 by cheryl j »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #512 on: 10/10/2013 05:03:25 »

See the very certain Islamic origin of the scientific method itself , that did originate directly from the Qur'anic epistemology , i did open a whole topic about...
...The Islamic impact on western civilization was so far reaching , as Briffault said ,that above mentioned essay tried to prove to be true , the islamic impact thus on western civilization was so far reaching that there was no single aspect of western growth that could not be traced back to those islamic impacts .
The Islamic impact on western civilization was in fact so far reaching that it did also originate the scientific method itself ,or science itself ..............

Besides, western thought was just an extension of the original Islamic one , western thought that has been taking since its own materialist and other paths though .........
Materialism  as an Eurocentric ideology and false conception of nature , or as a primitive backward degenerate -form-of-christianity secular religion has been making you ,westerners , even dumber , despite all those huge advances of science proper at the level of matter or at the level of material physical and biological processes , materialism had/has absolutely nothing to do with those scientific advances  .............
Materialism in all sciences , in art , literature ...that has been exported to the rest of the world ,thanks to western global domination and power ,is totally alien to those non-western cultures, societies .............
 



Congratulations to you and your people for inventing science. I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 15:22:28 by cheryl j »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #513 on: 10/10/2013 17:37:25 »
Wow... I hope that was just an embarrassing outburst, not a public breakdown.

Sweet dreams, Alice : your lack of understanding or your amazing tendency to  twisting things  and facts  is extremely staggering for a self-declared scientist..............unbelievable.
I was just having fun ..............at the expense of that laughable materialism ,and at yours as well ....= i couldn't help but doing just that = who could haha = only materialists could ...

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #514 on: 10/10/2013 17:50:03 »

See the very certain Islamic origin of the scientific method itself , that did originate directly from the Qur'anic epistemology , i did open a whole topic about...
...The Islamic impact on western civilization was so far reaching , as Briffault said ,that above mentioned essay tried to prove to be true , the islamic impact thus on western civilization was so far reaching that there was no single aspect of western growth that could not be traced back to those islamic impacts .
The Islamic impact on western civilization was in fact so far reaching that it did also originate the scientific method itself ,or science itself ..............

Besides, western thought was just an extension of the original Islamic one , western thought that has been taking since its own materialist and other paths though .........
Materialism  as an Eurocentric ideology and false conception of nature , or as a primitive backward degenerate -form-of-christianity secular religion has been making you ,westerners , even dumber , despite all those huge advances of science proper at the level of matter or at the level of material physical and biological processes , materialism had/has absolutely nothing to do with those scientific advances  .............
Materialism in all sciences , in art , literature ...that has been exported to the rest of the world ,thanks to western global domination and power ,is totally alien to those non-western cultures, societies .............
 



Congratulations to you and your people for inventing science. I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.

Ho, ho , ho : stop your  wild horses , cowgirl :
That was no bragging : how can i brag about something done by others , i cannot even brag about the things i did / do = makes no sense .
Why brag about anything for that matter ...
I said the early muslims   " invented " science : muslims are  no race =   1 of Islam's core messages is to abolish eradicate and refute any kindda discrimination on the basis of belief , race , skin color  , ethnic background, sex , ....in the Islamic sense .

Islam that's against any kindda racism, sectarianism , fascism ...........
Islam was even the first ever to proclaim the equality of all people ,as human beings  regardless of their race , sex , belief , ethnicity ,skin color  ........
I was just trying to respond to that post of yours , in order to correct your obvious   Eurocentric ignorance ,stereotypes, brainwash , prejudice ...on the subject ...that's all .
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 18:39:28 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #515 on: 10/10/2013 18:02:03 »
... I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.
... your German or rather nazi "comparison " or analogy are extremely insulting , disgusting and tasteless + incorrect .Thanks a lot for nothing .

I was just trying to respond to that post of yours , in order to correct your obvious   Eurocentric ignorance ,stereotypes, brainwash , prejudice ...on the subject ...that's all .
Wow, way to miss the point, Don! So keen to take offence and Godwin the thread... maybe you should try reading Cheryl's post again, for comprehension.

« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 18:04:09 by dlorde »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #516 on: 10/10/2013 18:19:49 »
Extended Minds :




 Our experiences of our bodies are in our bodies. The feelings in my fingers are in my fingers,
not in my head. Direct experience offers no support for the extraordinary claim that all experiences
are inside brains. Direct experience is not irrelevant to the nature of consciousness: it is
consciousness.

Well, I'm glad he's not my doctor, anyway. If feeling is in the fingers and not in the brain, why would damage to the brachial nerve plexus in the shoulder, (or a stroke) cause me to lose sensation or movement in my hand? My fingers are just fine! They weren't damaged at all.

 How would one use morphic fields to explain why bright lights or plucking an eyebrow sometimes makes people sneeze? If you don't know that the branching trigeminal cranial nerve receives information from the eyes, nose and upper brow area, and the brain sometimes misinterprets information coming from one as actually coming from another area, it makes no sense. Perception and the experience of sensation is not in the fingers (or the nose in the example above) it's in the brain.

Amputees experience phantom limbs. They experience pain, itchiness, and other sensations from a limb that clearly isn't there. (Perhaps their morphic field is itchy.) Neurologists believe that over time, the part of the brain that used to control the missing arm starts to be utilized for other body parts, and curiously, patients with phantom limb pain or itchiness can often get relief by rubbing their faces, which makes sense since the region devoted to the face is right next door in the somatosensory cortex.

There's a fun experiment called the rubber hand experiment. The participant's real hand is hidden from their sight and replaced with a rubber hand. The experimenter takes two paint brushes and gently strokes the rubber hand and the hidden hand in synchrony. Participants report a bizarre feeling that rubber hand is their hand, even though rationally, they are well aware it's fake. And if the experimenter threatens the rubber hand, with say a sharp knife, or whacks it with a hammer, they reflexively jump or jerk their own hand, even though it was never in any danger.

Another tactile illusion (called the thermal grill illusion) involves temperature receptors in the skin. One kind of temperature receptor responds to cold, 10-30 degrees C. Another responds to warm temperatures, between 30 and 45 degrees C. Both sets respond to scalding hot temperatures. If you take a kitchen fork and place it in cool water, and another in warm water for several minutes, and intertwine the tines of the warm and cool forks and place them against your skin, it creates an uncomfortable burning sensation, since usually that is the only time those receptors fire together. (That's also why your ears burn and itch when you come into a warm house on a cold day)

So what? Well, Sheldrake says direct experience is everything, we should always trust it, and yet it would appear that our consciousness can be fooled rather easily.

It's one thing to ask questions about the "hard problem" of the subjective feeling of consciousness, the unified sense of self, but Sheldrake sounds like he's denying pretty much everything in basic, first year anatomy and physiology book.


My Sheldrake's posted quotes do not necessarily reflect my own opinions  or views  on the subject,as they do not reflect those of this great site either  :
I just wanted to give you, people, his opinions views approaches ...on the subject : you're perfectly free to make of that what you wish to do ...
Despite Sheldrake's flaws , i would prefer him way above the whole majority of the scientific mainstream establishment or community put together ,on the subject , simply because he's honest enough , a man with integrity and courage enough , to condemn and to try to refute that outdated false deceptive materialist dogmatic belief system in science ...to try to liberate science from materialism that way .
He is also brave enough to dare enter a territory that's highly deceptive elusive indeed , by trying to tackle it : i think that , despite his pretty logical   human flaws ,taking into consideration the fact that all sciences and the rest are still under that materialist backward false and outdated dominance , and taking into consideration the temporary scientific data and knowledge of this time and age of ours , he should be , and he might be in the near or far future  , considered by the next generations as  1 of the greatest pioneers scientists  who dared/dare to open up whole new vistas for science away from that materialist dominance prison, science has been confined to for so long now : his work might still seem at the childish or at the embryonary stage maybe , but that's how new eras of science begin ...........others might take it from there ,and might come up with visions approaches views that might revolutionize science , our understanding of science and the universe thus , in still unimaginable -to-us -all ways ...

Quote
ps. I'd tell you some more chemistry jokes, but I only do that periodically. Anyway, the best ones argon.

haha , please do not , for your own sake, credibility  and dignity :
Do not try to risk being ridiculed and embarrassed  , if your ever try to do just that :
I am not a sadist or a cruel person , so, i warn you before hand : i will be unmerciful if you do  that  haha
Atoms do not  make up everything, neither figuratively nor literally , love ;see my post above in question on the subject .
.............
You do not only not realise the fact that those potentially materialist "jokes " , i can provide you with a whole arsenal from   by the way , are not only self-refuting self-defeating ,self-embarrassing , but they are also tasteless and incorrect ;
Worse : materialists think those materialist "jokes " are intelligent or funny = they are neither .
=Materialists cannot even come up with intelligent correct ,tastefull, or "logical " jokes
Pathetic , and tragic -hilarious ,sorry .
Only materialists, idiots or fools can come up with silly "jokes " that hit them back in the face as a launched boomerang that missed its intended target(s).

« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 18:30:35 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #517 on: 10/10/2013 18:24:17 »
... I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.
... your German or rather nazi "comparison " or analogy are extremely insulting , disgusting and tasteless + incorrect .Thanks a lot for nothing .

I was just trying to respond to that post of yours , in order to correct your obvious   Eurocentric ignorance ,stereotypes, brainwash , prejudice ...on the subject ...that's all .
Wow, way to miss the point, Don! So keen to take offence and Godwin the thread... maybe you should try reading Cheryl's post again, for comprehension.

Coming from Mr. miscomprehension par excellence himself, i cannot but decline this offer : try to correct your own major major major lack of comprehension regarding  what people tell you first , before trying to preach the very same to others = a paradoxical feature of a self-declared scientist ...amazing .

P.S.: Editing : you were right about that 1 thing = what a real "miracle" for  a ...self-declared scientist .....a "miracle" that shouldn't be one  .
If most scientists can make all those lethal errors of comprehension and twisting of facts ,like you do , then, i will be "praying " for science,and for its future as well  .........Amen...
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 19:57:01 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #518 on: 10/10/2013 19:35:47 »
By the way, folks :
The following is not the kindda materialism i have been talking about all along : just to make sure you do not confuse it with this one :
Cheers :


A Londoner parks his brand new Porsche in front of the office to show it off to his colleagues.

As he's getting out of the car, a lorry comes speeding along too close to the curb and takes off the door before zooming off. More than a little distraught, the Londoner grabs his mobile and calls the police. Five minutes later, the police arrive.

Before the policeman has a chance to ask any questions, the man starts screaming hysterically: "My Porsche, my beautiful silver Porsche is ruined.

No matter how long it's at the panel beaters it'll simply never be the same again!"

After the man finally finishes his rant, the policeman shakes his head in disgust "I can't believe how materialistic you bloody Londoners are," he says. "You lot are so focused on your possessions that you don't notice anything else in your life."

"How can you say such a thing at a time like this?" sobs the Porsche owner.

The policeman replies, "Didn't you realize that your right arm was torn off when the truck hit you?"

The Londoner looks down in horror "cuddling  HELL!" he screams.......

"Where's my Rolex????..."

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #519 on: 10/10/2013 19:51:27 »
@ Cheryl : see this forum : Why materialism is false :

http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?15753-Why-Materialism-is-False

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4912
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #520 on: 10/10/2013 20:49:37 »
Congratulations to you and your people for inventing science. I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.

Oy vey! You think you have troubles, already? Shalom.

But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 20:51:23 by alancalverd »
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #521 on: 10/10/2013 21:14:36 »
But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.
Also give him credit that despite the usual ill-mannered insults to me for pointing out his blunder, he did go back and edit his post to remove the offensive 'nazi' reference...
« Last Edit: 10/10/2013 21:21:11 by dlorde »

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4912
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #522 on: 10/10/2013 23:24:08 »
Offending nazis is not a crime, surely?
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #523 on: 11/10/2013 00:23:30 »
Offending nazis is not a crime, surely?
It was once; different time, different place ;)

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #524 on: 11/10/2013 01:43:15 »

My Sheldrake's posted quotes do not necessarily reflect my own opinions  or views  on the subject,as they do not reflect those of this great site either  :
I just wanted to give you, people, his opinions views approaches ...on the subject : you're perfectly free to make of that what you wish to do ...
Despite Sheldrake's flaws , i would prefer him way above the whole majority of the scientific mainstream establishment or community put together ,on the subject , simply because he's honest enough , a man with integrity and courage enough , to condemn and to try to refute that outdated false deceptive materialist dogmatic belief system in science ...to try to liberate science from materialism that way .
He is also brave enough to dare enter a territory that's highly deceptive elusive indeed , by trying to tackle it : i think that , despite his pretty logical   human flaws ,taking into consideration the fact that all sciences and the rest are still under that materialist backward false and outdated dominance , and taking into consideration the temporary scientific data and knowledge of this time and age of ours , he should be , and he might be in the near or far future  , considered by the next generations as  1 of the greatest pioneers scientists  who dared/dare to open up whole new vistas for science away from that materialist dominance prison, science has been confined to for so long now : his work might still seem at the childish or at the embryonary stage maybe , but that's how new eras of science begin ...........others might take it from there ,and might come up with visions approaches views that might revolutionize science , our understanding of science and the universe thus , in still unimaginable -to-us -all ways ...


If you are going to post long passages from books without any accompanying comments, I can only assume you are using them to support your arguments, and that is why I respond to them the way I do. If you are just posting them to edify or entertain me, thank you. I did give me greater insight into his strange lack of factual knowledge underlying his conclusions.

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #525 on: 11/10/2013 02:22:07 »

Ho, ho , ho : stop your  wild horses , cowgirl :
That was no bragging : how can i brag about something done by others , i cannot even brag about the things i did / do = makes no sense .
Why brag about anything for that matter ...
I said the early muslims   " invented " science : muslims are  no race =   1 of Islam's core messages is to abolish eradicate and refute any kindda discrimination on the basis of belief , race , skin color  , ethnic background, sex , ....in the Islamic sense .

Islam that's against any kindda racism, sectarianism , fascism ...........
Islam was even the first ever to proclaim the equality of all people ,as human beings  regardless of their race , sex , belief , ethnicity ,skin color  ........
I was just trying to respond to that post of yours , in order to correct your obvious   Eurocentric ignorance ,stereotypes, brainwash , prejudice ...on the subject ...that's all .


Sorry if I'm a bit touchy on this subject. But whether it's "race" or "ethnicity" or "people whose ancestors came from a certain geographical area sharing certain familiar connections and cultural traditions," it always raises a red flag. When ever I hear certain accomplishments attributed to a race, religion or nation of people, I wonder - really? Were they all sitting in the room together when this was done? I suspect some nerdy scientist, recently or hundreds of years ago, who may have been ignored or even misunderstood by his neighbors or closest blood relatives, would have given anything to talk to any other human interested in the same idea, no matter what his color or religion or gender,  in some foreign land. We take for granted this opportunity. So yes, when I hear some one boasting that this group invented this, or that group discovered that, it irks me a bit and makes me questions their motives in doing so.

On the other hand
, I'd like to point out that Canada (my adopted homeland) invented not only the dental mirror, but the paint roller as well. So there! And they invented Kevlar, so we can safely visit the United States. Those arrogant Americans like to take credit for the invention of the telephone, but Alexander Graham Bell was actually a Canadian, and his first words into it were not  "Watson, come here, I want to see you."  It was "Watson, we're out of beer. I want to see you." Necessity is the mother of invention, and after 200 stitches to his face, four broken noses, a fractured cheek and jawbone, and several concussions, hockey player Jaques Plante invented the goalie mask. (sheer brilliance!) Canadians also invented the snow mobile, snow plow and snow blower, after getting stranded in drifts for about 300 years. (Okay, they're not quick, but they do eventually come up with something.)
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 15:47:55 by cheryl j »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #526 on: 11/10/2013 15:42:28 »
Congratulations to you and your people for inventing science. I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.

Oy vey! You think you have troubles, already? Shalom.


Yes, I'm sorry about that. Although I don't know why since my German ancestors wandered over to North America in 1700/ 1800s, mixed it up with the English and Scots, and one native American. Still, I'm sure I share the arm of one  chromosome or another with somebody who did something awful to somebody else, either in Europe or over in America. Genetic guilt is probably as irrational as genetic pride, but it does, as I was trying explain to Don, have a tempering effect on the desire to base ones identity on affiliation with various groups, genetic or cultural.
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 15:53:49 by cheryl j »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #527 on: 11/10/2013 17:10:17 »

Ho, ho , ho : stop your  wild horses , cowgirl :
That was no bragging : how can i brag about something done by others , i cannot even brag about the things i did / do = makes no sense .
Why brag about anything for that matter ...
I said the early muslims   " invented " science : muslims are  no race =   1 of Islam's core messages is to abolish eradicate and refute any kindda discrimination on the basis of belief , race , skin color  , ethnic background, sex , ....in the Islamic sense .

Islam that's against any kindda racism, sectarianism , fascism ...........
Islam was even the first ever to proclaim the equality of all people ,as human beings  regardless of their race , sex , belief , ethnicity ,skin color  ........
I was just trying to respond to that post of yours , in order to correct your obvious   Eurocentric ignorance ,stereotypes, brainwash , prejudice ...on the subject ...that's all .


Sorry if I'm a bit touchy on this subject. But whether it's "race" or "ethnicity" or "people whose ancestors came from a certain geographical area sharing certain familiar connections and cultural traditions," it always raises a red flag. When ever I hear certain accomplishments attributed to a race, religion or nation of people, I wonder - really? Were they all sitting in the room together when this was done? I suspect some nerdy scientist, recently or hundreds of years ago, who may have been ignored or even misunderstood by his neighbors or closest blood relatives, would have given anything to talk to any other human interested in the same idea, no matter what his color or religion or gender,  in some foreign land. We take for granted this opportunity. So yes, when I hear some one boasting that this group invented this, or that group discovered that, it irks me a bit and makes me questions their motives in doing so.


I told you i was just responding to that post of yours earlier , didn't i?
I see no point in repeating myself .
I do even reject such  notions or  rather  illusions such as  nationality, nationalism , patriotism ....not to mention all those illusionary ridiculous "identities " based on race (White supremacists ....ku kulx klan haha , neo-nazis, skin heads ....Arab nationalism ....the mainstream global dominance of  white Eurocentrism and white Eurocentric materialism ...Chinese nationalism , Turkish nationalism ...Russian nationalism ...), ethnicity , geography, belief .............

P.S.: There are actually muslims from all nationalities, races, ethnic groups , skin color , sex, from different cultures, nations,geographies  ..............

Once again, universal Islam happened/ happens and will continue to happen proclaiming the obvious God-given equality of all peoples , regardless of their race , skin color, sex , belief , ethnicity .............



Quote
Quote

On the other hand
, I'd like to point out that Canada (my adopted homeland) invented not only the dental mirror, but the paint roller as well. So there! And they invented Kevlar, so we can safely visit the United States. Those arrogant Americans like to take credit for the invention of the telephone, but Alexander Graham Bell was actually a Canadian, and his first words into it were not  "Watson, come here, I want to see you."  It was "Watson, we're out of beer. I want to see you." Necessity is the mother of invention, and after 200 stitches to his face, four broken noses, a fractured cheek and jawbone, and several concussions, hockey player Jaques Plante invented the goalie mask. (sheer brilliance!) Canadians also invented the snow mobile, snow plow and snow blower, after getting stranded in drifts for about 300 years. (Okay, they're not quick, but they do eventually come up with something.)

In the above first part of this post of yours , you expressed  your legetimate suspicion skepticism and aversion regarding any race ,nationality ,geography . culture...based ideologies or manufactured illusionary "identities " based on race , ethnicity , sectarianism, geography , cultures , nationalities ...and rightly so, but ,then again, you immediatly went on boosting about the Canadian achievements ...= how paradoxical can you be ?

Try to read this interesting book on the subject , you can find on line, written by the Indian-British famous economist who won the nobel prize for economy : Amartya Sen : " Identity and Violence  , the illusion of destiny " , even though it's just a liberal view .
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Identity-Violence-Illusion-Amartya-Sen/dp/0141027800
Here is the book review , to give you a first taste or flavour of the book in question :  very actual book indeed , regarding the rise of nationalism, ethnicism, sectarianism , racism, xenophoby , muslim and other religious extremism ..............as a result of globalism , i guess :
http://www.gobookee.org/get_book.php?u=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21tdW5pdHktcmVsYXRpb25zLm9yZy51ay9mcy9kb2MvYm9vay1yZXZpZXcucGRmCklkZW50aXR5IGFuZCBWaW9sZW5jZTogdGhlIGlsbHVzaW9uIG9mIGRlc3Rpbnk=
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 19:54:25 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #528 on: 11/10/2013 17:34:05 »
Congratulations to you and your people for inventing science. I've never been tempted to brag about my racial heritage; it just seems to get Germans into all sorts of trouble when they start doing that, and then no one wants to sit next to them at a dinner parties.

Oy vey! You think you have troubles, already? Shalom.

But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.

Haha
If i am a sinistral. as you put it at least , and you like that joke , then , you are a sinistral as well , logically .
I did just post that  joke regarding another kind of materialism that should not be confused with the philosophical one i was talking about all along ...

I have been accused of many things during my relatively short life up untill now , but i was never accused of being a sinistral before haha ..............

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #529 on: 11/10/2013 17:38:01 »

My Sheldrake's posted quotes do not necessarily reflect my own opinions  or views  on the subject,as they do not reflect those of this great site either  :
I just wanted to give you, people, his opinions views approaches ...on the subject : you're perfectly free to make of that what you wish to do ...
Despite Sheldrake's flaws , i would prefer him way above the whole majority of the scientific mainstream establishment or community put together ,on the subject , simply because he's honest enough , a man with integrity and courage enough , to condemn and to try to refute that outdated false deceptive materialist dogmatic belief system in science ...to try to liberate science from materialism that way .
He is also brave enough to dare enter a territory that's highly deceptive elusive indeed , by trying to tackle it : i think that , despite his pretty logical   human flaws ,taking into consideration the fact that all sciences and the rest are still under that materialist backward false and outdated dominance , and taking into consideration the temporary scientific data and knowledge of this time and age of ours , he should be , and he might be in the near or far future  , considered by the next generations as  1 of the greatest pioneers scientists  who dared/dare to open up whole new vistas for science away from that materialist dominance prison, science has been confined to for so long now : his work might still seem at the childish or at the embryonary stage maybe , but that's how new eras of science begin ...........others might take it from there ,and might come up with visions approaches views that might revolutionize science , our understanding of science and the universe thus , in still unimaginable -to-us -all ways ...


If you are going to post long passages from books without any accompanying comments, I can only assume you are using them to support your arguments, and that is why I respond to them the way I do. If you are just posting them to edify or entertain me, thank you. I did give me greater insight into his strange lack of factual knowledge underlying his conclusions.

Well, since you were asking for non - materialist approaches and views  , i just provided you with Sheldrake's , Nagel's ...so.
Sheldrake's unorthodox approaches might be the genesis of the new era  of science ...who knows ...

P.S.: What do you think of that link i provided you with earlier , concerning "Why materialism is false ?" .

« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 18:04:51 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #530 on: 11/10/2013 17:46:16 »
Offending nazis is not a crime, surely?

Sure : who did offend the nazis here anyway ?
Offending the zionazis neither : Shalom.

« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 17:48:49 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #531 on: 11/10/2013 18:00:53 »
But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.
Also give him credit that despite the usual ill-mannered insults to me for pointing out his blunder, he did go back and edit his post to remove the offensive 'nazi' reference...

Thanks for noticing : what a miracle .
What offensive nazi reference by the way ?
I just thought that Cheryl was alluding to the nazis when she talked about those bragging Germans about their racial heritage = my blunder and mistake  , so, i just said that that nazi "comparison or analogy " was disgusting , insulting ............
What, on earth, is wrong with your comprehension skills, friend ?

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #532 on: 11/10/2013 18:08:36 »
@ Cheryl :
Why Materialism is False ? :


Source : http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?15753-Why-Materialism-is-False

Prior Note :

The following article does not necessarily reflect my own opinions or views on the subject :

The critique of materialism goes way beyond what the following article tries to approach ,summarize or tackle  :
-I-I do not agree with the author's allegations that materialism has succeeded in "solving " the challenge or hard problem of life , design, thought , morality ...
0_Materialism is just a dogmatic belief system or rather a false secular religion ideology  in science , a misconsception of nature in science , that has absolutely nothing to do with science thus , and that just tries to "validate " itself through science , in vain of course , logically and per-definition .
I_Those so-called neurocomputation mechanisms cannot account for such  non-physical non-biological  processes such as thought either .
II-Darwin's theory of evolution is only and exclusively biological physical , so, it tackles only the physical biological side of evolution, but materialists , per definition, just try to extend it to non-physical non-biological processes ,for obvious materialist ideological "reasons " that have ,obviously , nothing to do with science  .
III- That life can be approached via physics and chemistry does not mean that life is just that .
IV_ Materialism cannot , per definition, succeed in "refuting " the existence of God, design ................behind all those laws of physics ............

V-Neither the materialist version or rather the materialist misinterpretation of Darwin's exclusively biological physical theory of evolution , nor Darwin's exclusively biological physical theory of evolution can account for human morality, cognition,  life or of consciousness "fully" ........let alone their  evolution .
VI-Materialism can, per definition , not account for consciousness, life ,feelings , emotions,  human cognition , human conscience , human morality , ...."fully" , let alone their origins evolution or emergence .
_VII-The brain does not cause consciousness : that alleged causality that's ,obviously , just a materialist misinterpretation of that   mutual actual factual correlation or interaction between the brain and consciousness thus  , was never proven to be true, ever , that's just a materialist belief assumption : causation is no explanation either .
VIII-There is a lot more to say on the subject , so, i will just leave it at that ,for the time being at least .

Quote :

" Why Materialism is False:

    In short, I think materialism is false. Below is why, with a detour through the reasons why Materialism isn't false.

    I don't mind if you read this or not, just thought I'd share for anyone remotely interested. No, it's not particularly well written or well structured, and there is so much more that could be said on this topic, but ... meh.

    _______________________________________________________________

    Materalism, I define as follows:
    'The theory that physical matter is the only reality and that everything, including thought, feeling, mind, and will, can be explained in terms of matter and physical phenomena.' - Answers.com
    First, there is an important distinction to be made. Materialism and Science are not the same thing. Science is the study of the natural world, so Science has no jurisdiction over any theory regarding that which cannot be empirically tested.

    For example, suppose a Theist were to conjecture that God is the law enforcer of the universe, ensuring that at every moment, at every place, all physical occurrences obeyed the laws that God has decreed. This conjecture is impossible to test scientifically, since all possible experimental observations are consistent with its predictions. However, the unscientific character of our Theist's conjecture does not mean that it is false; the answer to the question is simply outside of the jurisdiction of the Scientific method.

    The philosophy of Materialism goes beyond the Scientific Method, postulating that only the material exists. This would place the Materialist in disagreement with our Theist. If it is true that only the material exists, then the Theist's law enforcer God does not exist, since that God would qualify as immaterial.

    The above constitutes the important distinction between Materialism and Science, whilst also explaining why Materialists are always Scientists. However the philosophy of Materialism should not be conflated with that of Science, as it is possible to both be a Scientist and not be a Materialist.

    _______________________________________________________________


    Materialism has always been an unpopular philosophy, with critics branding it as cold, uncaring and fundamentally amoral. The philosophy has had its most bitter rivals in that of Theism, as Materialism denies the truth of religious scripture, denying the existence of God, the afterlife and the immortal soul. Despite this, Materialism has stumbled on, with proponents offering Materialistic solutions to many of the long standing problems in philosophy. The problems listed below have stood as criticisms to the Materialistic philosophy now and in the past. The list is not comprehensive, but does reflect what I believe to have been the key problems that Materialism has overcome.

    1) The problem of life
    2) The problem of design
    3) The problem of thought
    4) The problem of morality
    Here I will sketch a brief overview of what each problem is and how I believe the Materialist can solve it.

    The first and easiest is the problem of life. The problem arises from the unique properties and capabilities of living organisms; it had seemed incomprehensible that the mechanical world of physics could explain the biological. Something else was needed, so it was postulated that a vital force animated living matter, imbuing it with lifelike qualities. The doctrine held that life was inexplicable in terms of physicochemical interactions. If the Materialist could not explain life, then Materialism must be false.

    The Materialist did not get his answer to this problem in one sweeping theory, but rather a cumulation of experimental findings, from William Harvey's discovery that the circularitory system was a cleverly engineered mechanism to pump blood around the body, to Fracis Crick and James Watson's discovery of the double helix structure of DNA. The march of scientific progress has unveiled the fine structure of cellular machinery, all working impeccably from physicochemical laws without the need for a vital animating force.

    Here the Materialist can explain how life works without appealing to any immaterial vital essence, but there still remains another problem to be solved. This is the problem of design. How is it that this incredible arrangement of organised matter came into being? The odds that such organisation would occur by chance are astronomically low, but life is bustling all around us in a multitude of forms. If the Materialist cannot explain this design, then Materialism must be false.

    In 1859, in a joint paper by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace that explanation was provided. The Materialist now had The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection i.e. The gradual accumulation of adaptive organisation by selective advantage. This elegant theory has provided the Materialist with an answer to the problem of design, which has in time been corroborated by a vast amount of evidence, from practically every field of scientific study.

    The problem of design had been solved, but an interesting disagreement between Alfred Russell Wallace and Charles Darwin persisted. The problem of thought presented itself. To Wallace, the human capacity for reasoned thought was beyond the reach of evolution, a feat which could simply not have been achieved by anything other than supernatural intervention, or in other words: God given. How could it be that a physical system could possibly think? If Materialism cannot explain how it is that we think, then Materialism must be false.

    The answer to the problem today is all around us, in front of anyone reading this at this very moment, i.e. computation. Alan Turing's Turing machine and the advent of modern electronics are a vivid illustration that complex computational architecture, obeying only the laws of physics can perform intelligent operations. The Materialist can now look to neurobiology, where cognition is explained as the consequent of neurocomputations occurring in parallel throughout the central nervous system. The Materialist now has his answer to Wallace's conjecture that the capacity for reason is unevolvable and must be God given.

    So the Materialist has provided powerful arguments to solve the problem of life, the problem of design and the problem thought. Unlike these three problems, the final problem on my list cannot refute Materialism. If Materialism is indeed amoral, it would be a nonsequitor to conclude from Materialism's amorality that it is false. For this reason, the problem of morality is a special case, but nonetheless very powerful. Briefly, the argument claims that if we are nothing but an unintentional consequence of natural selection, nothing but elaborate machines and built by selfish genes, then there is no reason to work for a higher purpose. For what reason should we treat our fellow man with compassion? What becomes of right and wrong with no God?

    The answer to this problem is the combined product of evolutionary biology, neurobiology and philosophy. The combined solutions to the previous three problems set the stage for solving the problem of morality. First, evolutionary biology, far from undermining the basis of morality, can explain why we have a moral sense in the first place. Second, neurobiology has provided scientists with evidence of how the human brain computes moral decisions. Finally, philosophers have raised objections to the accusation that Materialism is inherently amoral, refuting the accusations with powerful solutions and counterarguments.

    Note: I am sure many reading this may object to the solutions I have presented to the 'four problems,' such objections are welcome and I encourage further criticism.

    ________________________________________________________________

    I have taken this detour through the successes of Materialism to drive home that I have no political agenda against the philosophy, religiously motivated or otherwise. I now wish to draw attention to my fifth problem for Materialism:

    5) The problem of consciousness
    A single element of conscious experience is called a quale, a group of quale are known as qualia. A quale might be the subjective experience of red, cold or pain. All quale are symbolic representations of frequencies and angles. The problem for Materialism is explaining qualia, the subjective experience of life, the very subjective experience without which we cannot imagine life being worth living at all. How can a physical system such as the brain be responsible for consciousness?. This is no small problem, for if Materialism cannot explain consciousness, then Materialism is false.

    The problem of consciousness has puzzled philosophers for centuries. To clarify the problem, imagine opening up my brain whilst displaying a large red circle to my eyes. After some probing, you discover a cluster of neurons whose combined activity is responsible for my conscious experience of red. However, all you have is my word to go on, there is nothing special about that particular cluster of neurons, no telltale sign that these are responsible for my conscious experience. To the outside observer, the entire neurocomputational system would work exactly the same whether or not I was actually consciously experiencing the red circle. To make make matters more puzzling, even if I am consciously experiencing life, how do you know that what you call red is what I call red? So long as the frequencies and angles which these qualia represent maintain a constant relation to each other, then for all you know my conscious experience of red might be radically different to yours.

    No matter where you look in my brain, even if you are looking at that particular cluster of neurons responsible for my conscious experience of red, you cannot sensibly say that you are looking at the quale redness. The redness I see is qualitively independent of the neural substrate that is responsible for that quale. To put this another way, I would argue that qualia are ontologically irreducible to the neural substrate, that is, qualia have independent qualities which cannot be explained at the physical level. However, I also would argue that consciousness is entirely caused by the neural substrate, that consciousness has no informational content or cognitive ability above that which occurs on the neurocomputational level i.e. consciousness is causally reducible to the neural substrate.

    To clarify, we can play a thought experiment involving two billiard balls. Billiard ball 1 and billiard ball 2. First take these two examples:

    1) Imagine ball 1 moving on a trajectory toward ball 2. As ball 1 strikes ball 2, both have a change of velocity.
    2) Imagine ball 1 moving on a trajectory toward ball 2. This time, imagine that ball 2 is invisible. As ball 1 strikes ball 2, both have a change of velocity.
    Notice that in example number 2 we infer the existence of ball 2 because of the change in velocity of ball 1. We cannot directly experience ball 2, so our knowledge of ball 2 is limited by it's relationship to ball 1. Now, take a third example:

    3) Imagine ball 1 moving on a trajectory toward ball 2. This time, imagine that ball 2 is invisible and has a one way causal relationship to ball 1. As ball 1 strikes ball 2, only ball 2 changes its velocity and ball 1 carries on at a constant speed, in a straight line.
    In this thought experiment, ball 2 exists and it's change in velocity is caused by ball 1, but to any observer unable to register ball 2, it remains completely invisible and undetectable. My conjecture is that qualia are like ball 2, which is why the conscious experience of other human beings is impossible to detect, the causal interaction is one way.

    The problem for the Materialist is that consciousness itself is immaterial, the frequencies and angles that make up subjective experience may be caused by, but are not part of the Material world. Thus, I conclude that Materialism is false.

    ________________________________________________________________

    A possible criticism of my theory is that consciousness is an emergent consequence of brain activity. This is a tempting view to take, analogous to the quality of wetness. A body of water is wet, even though no particular element of that body of water is wet. To clarify, a single molecule of H2O cannot be wet, because the quality of wetness is dependent upon the interactions of the constituent parts, without belong to any of those particular constituent parts. Wetness is an emergent property. A critic might conjecture that consciousness is also an emergent property of brain activity.

    I do not think that consciousness is an emergent product of brain activity. The difference between wetness and consciousness is that the quality of wetness follows from the physical laws governing the behavior of H2O, that is, given only the laws of physics I could predict that particular chemical substances would have the emergent property of wetness. The same cannot be said of consciousness. Given only the laws of physics, I could not predict the emergence of consciousness, it simply does not follow that from any complex neurocomputational system that consciousness should be." End Quote.
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 18:52:49 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4912
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #533 on: 11/10/2013 18:11:04 »

Haha
If i am a sinistral. as you put it at least , and you like that joke , then , you are a sinistral as well , logically .
I did just post that  joke regarding another kind of materialism that should not be confused with the philosophical one i was talking about all along ...

I have been accused of many things during my relatively short life up untill now , but i was never accused of being a sinistral before haha ..............


In that case you definitely have an oddly biased view of the world! Most people wear their watch on the left wrist, and the buttons are normally placed that way, but a few "hard lefties" prefer the right.

Quote
Materialism and Science are not the same thing.

except, apparently, in your own ravings.

Beware of selfcontradiction. Remember the fate of the Oozlum bird: not knowing whether it was coming or going, it changed direction so many times that it flew up its own arse and disappeared. Incidentally this is the basis of Continuum String Theory.

Quote
Notice that in example number 2 we infer the existence of ball 2 because of the change in velocity of ball 1. We cannot directly experience ball 2, so our knowledge of ball 2 is limited by it's relationship to ball 1.

What do you mean by "directly experience"? We infer the existence of 2 because of its observed effect on 1. But we inferred the existence of 1 from its interaction with photons that then interacted with our eyes. So what?  It's an everyday observation: many people have heard cuckoos, few have seen them, and only other cuckoos have "directly experienced" a cuckoo, probably during the mating season (they are mostly solitary).

Quote
3) Imagine ball 1 moving on a trajectory toward ball 2. This time, imagine that ball 2 is invisible and has a one way causal relationship to ball 1. As ball 1 strikes ball 2, only ball 2 changes its velocity and ball 1 carries on at a constant speed, in a straight line.

It is difficult, and certainly pointless,  to conduct a thought experiment that defies the laws of nature. If momentum is not conserved in your universe, you are clearly not of this world, nor of any other with which we can interact.
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 18:24:56 by alancalverd »
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #534 on: 11/10/2013 18:42:58 »

Haha
If i am a sinistral. as you put it at least , and you like that joke , then , you are a sinistral as well , logically .
I did just post that  joke regarding another kind of materialism that should not be confused with the philosophical one i was talking about all along ...

I have been accused of many things during my relatively short life up untill now , but i was never accused of being a sinistral before haha ..............


In that case you definitely have an oddly biased view of the world! Most people wear their watch on the left wrist, and the buttons are normally placed that way, but a few "hard lefties" prefer the right.

Quote
Materialism and Science are not the same thing.

except, apparently, in your own ravings.

Beware of selfcontradiction. Remember the fate of the Oozlum bird: not knowing whether it was coming or going, it changed direction so many times that it flew up its own arse and disappeared. Incidentally this is the basis of Continuum String Theory.

Quote
Notice that in example number 2 we infer the existence of ball 2 because of the change in velocity of ball 1. We cannot directly experience ball 2, so our knowledge of ball 2 is limited by it's relationship to ball 1.

What do you mean by "directly experience"? We infer the existence of 2 because of its observed effect on 1. But we inferred the existence of 1 from its interaction with photons that then interacted with our eyes. So what?  It's an everyday observation: many people have heard cuckoos, few have seen them, and only other cuckoos have "directly experienced" a cuckoo, probably during the mating season (they are mostly solitary).

Quote
3) Imagine ball 1 moving on a trajectory toward ball 2. This time, imagine that ball 2 is invisible and has a one way causal relationship to ball 1. As ball 1 strikes ball 2, only ball 2 changes its velocity and ball 1 carries on at a constant speed, in a straight line.

It is difficult, and certainly pointless,  to conduct a thought experiment that defies the laws of nature. If momentum is not conserved in your universe, you are clearly not of this world, nor of any other with which we can interact.

First of all, stop using your grudges , rancune ...."revenge "   feelings or emotions  ,as "arguments " = they are not .

Second : only those dishonest self-deluded die-hard core materialist fanatics , idiots or fools would deny the obvious fact that materialism and science are 2 totally different "things " .

Third : science can only approach the material side of reality , directly empirically , so to speak : the non-material processes or the non-material side of reality can be approached by science , indirectly , via a multitude of ways , especially via approaching their  material basis .

Fourth :what kindda ''answers "  are these then ?
Try to elaborate on that  wilst avoiding judgements of value , dude : those judgements of value of yours you must have been confusing with arguments ....
Insults or toilet language are no arguments either .

P,S.: The fact that offending zionazism is not a crime either (Actually , offending zionazism is the least one can do = an understatement thus )  , a fact you might deny as such , is no "reason " to utter such garbage language on a science forum , as a result .
Shalom ............Amen haha
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 19:01:50 by DonQuichotte »


*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #536 on: 11/10/2013 20:52:14 »
Are You Smart Enough To Get These Nerdy Jokes?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbrbrzT56pU

Big Bang Theory best science joke

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SbwmooRTBI


The Big Bang Theory - Please don't touch my breasts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U00l2U6al4
« Last Edit: 11/10/2013 21:02:24 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #537 on: 12/10/2013 00:07:43 »



I told you i was just responding to that post of yours earlier , didn't i?
I see no point in repeating myself .
I do even reject such  notions or  rather  illusions such as  nationality, nationalism , patriotism ....not to mention all those illusionary ridiculous "identities " based on race (White supremacists ....ku kulx klan haha , neo-nazis, skin heads ....Arab nationalism ....the mainstream global dominance of  white Eurocentrism and white Eurocentric materialism ...Chinese nationalism , Turkish nationalism ...Russian nationalism ...), ethnicity , geography, belief .............

P.S.: There are actually muslims from all nationalities, races, ethnic groups , skin color , sex, from different cultures, nations,geographies  ..............

Once again, universal Islam happened/ happens and will continue to happen proclaiming the obvious God-given equality of all peoples , regardless of their race , skin color, sex , belief , ethnicity .............






Belief? well, as I understand it, you aren't really equal unless you share their religious beliefs and adhere to their practices, so I would say it is a bit a little exclusionary in that sense. Which is fine, their club, their rules.
« Last Edit: 12/10/2013 02:21:49 by cheryl j »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #538 on: 12/10/2013 01:09:17 »
But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.
Also give him credit that despite the usual ill-mannered insults to me for pointing out his blunder, he did go back and edit his post to remove the offensive 'nazi' reference...

Thanks for noticing : what a miracle .
What offensive nazi reference by the way ?
I just thought that Cheryl was alluding to the nazis when she talked about those bragging Germans about their racial heritage = my blunder and mistake  , so, i just said that that nazi "comparison or analogy " was disgusting , insulting ............
What, on earth, is wrong with your comprehension skills, friend ?


Well, actually I was alluding to Nazis, and I was  comparing your boasts to that sort of thing. So no need to apologize, Don.
« Last Edit: 12/10/2013 01:35:08 by cheryl j »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #539 on: 12/10/2013 01:19:18 »


In the above first part of this post of yours , you expressed  your legetimate suspicion skepticism and aversion regarding any race ,nationality ,geography . culture...based ideologies or manufactured illusionary "identities " based on race , ethnicity , sectarianism, geography , cultures , nationalities ...and rightly so, but ,then again, you immediatly went on boosting about the Canadian achievements ...= how paradoxical can you be ?



Um, no,  I was just  kidding around. I was not sincerely bragging about the invention of the paint roller, although, it is quite nifty when you need one.
« Last Edit: 12/10/2013 01:32:52 by cheryl j »

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #540 on: 12/10/2013 01:50:27 »

P.S.: What do you think of that link i provided you with earlier , concerning "Why materialism is false ?" .



You know it's curious that you are most comfortable attacking the weaknesses or lack of progress you perceive in materialism, and want me to defend it all. But when you post crazy stuff by Sheldrake or even Nagel, and their alternative theories, and someone attacks them point by point, suddenly you disassociate yourself from them, and say their opinions are not really yours; you are just sharing them to broaden our horizons.

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #541 on: 12/10/2013 17:31:22 »
But give DonQ credit for the joke - I like it. And it also tells us that DonQ is a sinistral.
Also give him credit that despite the usual ill-mannered insults to me for pointing out his blunder, he did go back and edit his post to remove the offensive 'nazi' reference...

Thanks for noticing : what a miracle .
What offensive nazi reference by the way ?
I just thought that Cheryl was alluding to the nazis when she talked about those bragging Germans about their racial heritage = my blunder and mistake  , so, i just said that that nazi "comparison or analogy " was disgusting , insulting ............
What, on earth, is wrong with your comprehension skills, friend ?


Well, actually I was alluding to Nazis, and I was  comparing your boasts to that sort of thing. So no need to apologize, Don.

Well, thanks for your honesty : i see there was / is nothing wrong with my comprehension skills thus ,after all : dlorde  as the miscomprehension champ par excellence here ,brought me on the wrong path thus .
I think, you 're the one who should apologize for comparing my replies to your post to those of the nazis , thanks a lot for nothing = disgusting , and extremely insulting "comparison " + an incorrect and an inappropriate one = an understatement .
I am very disappointed in you, Cheryl : i thought you were a pretty little charming nice and intelligent lady : maybe , i made a mistake in that regard .......


*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #542 on: 12/10/2013 18:45:37 »

P.S.: What do you think of that link i provided you with earlier , concerning "Why materialism is false ?" .



You know it's curious that you are most comfortable attacking the weaknesses or lack of progress you perceive in materialism, and want me to defend it all. But when you post crazy stuff by Sheldrake or even Nagel, and their alternative theories, and someone attacks them point by point, suddenly you disassociate yourself from them, and say their opinions are not really yours; you are just sharing them to broaden our horizons.

Obviously and normally , i should stop replying to your posts ,untill you apologize for your extremely insulting nazi "comparison ", but , i will not , for the time being at least , simply because i still have faith in you , as a nice charming and intelligent lady ....i guess.
Anyway :
You were too  biasly kind to materialism , i see :
I was not attacking only the weaknesses or lack of progress of materialism,as you put it at least (materialism is in fact not only outdated , superseded even by the physical sciences themselves it has been dominating for so long now ,materialism is  not only flase and dead ,but also obviously, and per- definition , unprogressive= backward and primitive = how can it be progressive or lacking progress ... )  : i was stating a fact mainly = materialism in all sciences and elsewhere  is not only false , but has been also hijacking misusing all the sciences + all the rest of those human activities  as well  ,  for ideological materialist purposes , materialism that has been deceiving and lying to the prople for centuries now, in the name of science = an understatement .
The core issue here is thus ,as follows ,once again : materialism is certainly false : i did even post a whole post from another forum on the subject , but you did not address those reasonable,philosophical, moral  and scientific  issues raised by that above displayed  post: instead of that , you just changed the subject, by stating the above = "we almost all prefer to judge and accuse others , in order to avoid being judged and accused ourselves "  .
Besides, i  did not disassociate myself from Nagel and Sheldrake, as you put it at least , simply because there was no association between me and them  in any way, neither figuratively nor literally or intellectually , in the first place to begin with  : i just happened to quote them to support some of my claims , simply because you asked for it , and simply because they go beyond that false materialism , by first refuting it , and then by offering some alternatives to it as well : those non-materialist offered alternatives were / are both still vague , still in the making , and still seem and sound so embryonary,logically  : so, i said , we might be witnessing the genesis of a new science era , away from that materialist prison and materialist belief dogmas in science , the latter has been confined to since the 19 th century at least .........
You have to ask yourself why you make me repeat the same replies to the same questions you asked before i did give answers to ,instead of addressing those true legetimate issues concerning that false materialism .
When one would establish the obvious undeniable fact that science is not materialism,and that materialism is false  ( Amazing how one is forced nowadays to prove obvious and undeniable facts to self-proclaimed scientific people ...unbelievable .) , then, one can take it from there ,and see where  that can lead to : any reasonable person should reject thus false ideas , false conceptions of nature , false hypotheses ...when confronted with the corresponding evidence = you do not = you continue to deny the obvious and undeniable fact that materialism is ...false .
Way to go , "scientific " girl : i cannot say  i can be proud of you in that regard , so to speak then :
Worse : instead of recognizing and acknowledging the obvious undeniable fact that materialism is false , you just avoid that by  accusing and judging Nagel and Sheldrake ,even though i said, many times  here on the occasion  , that the both of them have been at least couragoeus and honest enough  not only to refute the mainstream false materialism supported by the whole majority of scientists , risking their careers , credibilty,integrity  and much more in the process , but they also dared / dare to enter a highly deceptive and elusive territory the approach of which is highly and extremely difficult , if not impossible , in this time and age at least ....no wonder that Nagel and Sheldrake make some blunders and mistakes as a result = pretty logical and normal , considering the fact that they have been entering a still not -yet explored territory , an unknown and highly deceptive and elusive territory that requires new revolutionary and radical approaches , new understandings of science , epistemology and the universe thus that we can only try to imagine in this time and age = beyond our imaginations yet ..................
In other words , and in short :
You do deny the obvious and undeniable fact that materialism is false = the universe is not just a matter of physics and chemistry , but , you also try to denigrate such courageous and honest scientist and thinker such as respectively Sheldrake and Nagel , you try to denigrate those men of great honesty , integrity and courage who dared to condemn refute materialism in science , while risking their own careers and much more in the process , who dared / dare even to offer some alternatives to that false materialism ....their own limited human ways that are seriously limited also by the limited nature and quality of the scientific data in this time and age on the subjects of consciousness,memory ,life ,human cognition  ...........................
Those are  the features of a dishonest deceptive hypocrit preacher you have been displaying , i see , unfortunately enough .......not features of a resonable scientific logical human being .......
Way to go, girl = congratulations .
« Last Edit: 12/10/2013 18:57:29 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #543 on: 12/10/2013 19:03:30 »


In the above first part of this post of yours , you expressed  your legetimate suspicion skepticism and aversion regarding any race ,nationality ,geography . culture...based ideologies or manufactured illusionary "identities " based on race , ethnicity , sectarianism, geography , cultures , nationalities ...and rightly so, but ,then again, you immediatly went on boosting about the Canadian achievements ...= how paradoxical can you be ?



Um, no,  I was just  kidding around. I was not sincerely bragging about the invention of the paint roller, although, it is quite nifty when you need one.

Wow, please do not insult my relative intelligence ........by lying and by being dishonest in that regard , come on ........
I should be the one "insulting " you ,by raising the issue of nazism, since you yourself admitted that you have some German "blood " running in your veins , or German "genes " in your body , but i won't do that , simply because not all Germans can be blamed for nazism, especially not those post-war German generations ...

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #544 on: 12/10/2013 19:29:26 »



I told you i was just responding to that post of yours earlier , didn't i?
I see no point in repeating myself .
I do even reject such  notions or  rather  illusions such as  nationality, nationalism , patriotism ....not to mention all those illusionary ridiculous "identities " based on race (White supremacists ....ku kulx klan haha , neo-nazis, skin heads ....Arab nationalism ....the mainstream global dominance of  white Eurocentrism and white Eurocentric materialism ...Chinese nationalism , Turkish nationalism ...Russian nationalism ...), ethnicity , geography, belief .............

P.S.: There are actually muslims from all nationalities, races, ethnic groups , skin color , sex, from different cultures, nations,geographies  ..............

Once again, universal Islam happened/ happens and will continue to happen proclaiming the obvious God-given equality of all peoples , regardless of their race , skin color, sex , belief , ethnicity .............






Belief? well, as I understand it, you aren't really equal unless you share their religious beliefs and adhere to their practices, so I would say it is a bit a little exclusionary in that sense. Which is fine, their club, their rules.

No, that's not true : that some muslims today , in the past or even in the future might be accused of discriminating against non-muslims , simply because they happened /happen / will happen to be non-muslims is no 'argument " against Islam in that or in any other regard for that matter , simply because Islam teaches otherwise .............
P.S.: Islam is not an exclusive club = Islam is universal .
Important note : i am not here to talk about or "defend " Islam ,this is a science forum , not a religious one ,  so, i will not be responding to any issues regarding Islam, except if those issues would be raised in relation to the Islamic origin of the scientific method ,or in relation to materialism .....
Instead of attacking Islam  through your Eurocentric brainwash indoctrinations bias prejudice stereotypes ...ignorance , instead of attacking Sheldrake and Nagel, simply because they are anti-materialism ,or simply because they cannot , obviously logically normally , come up with serious alternatives to materialism (The next generations will surely  do just that ,no doubt in my mind about that ) , why don't you just stop denying the obvious and undeniable fact that materialism is false = these side issues , exit -strategies , distractions, changing of subjects of yours won't make the obvious undeniable fact go away that materialism is obviously and undeniably false ............


In short :

"We almost all prefer to accuse and judge others , in order to avoid being judged and accused ourselves " French Albert Camus nobel prize winner for literature ...

I might be no exception to that rule, i guess , who knows .
But , fact is : we are not talking here , on this great science forum, about Islam ,or about alternatives to that false materialism that will still be coming in the near or far future ..............we are talking here  mainly about consciousness, and therefore  about the obvious undeniable fact that materialism is false , and must be rejected .....................after establishing that obvious undeniable fact (Amazing how  one is forced , once again, to prove obvious undeniable facts to be true on a science forum = tragic -hilarious , and the saddest thing of all about that is that you, guys , do not only reject that obvious undeniable fact , do not only make silly "jokes" about that , but you also never question the "validity or truth " of materialism in the process ...unbelievable ), after accepting that obvious undeniable fact that materialism is false , then and only then we can talk about potentially valid alternatives to materialism, not earlier ...


*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #545 on: 12/10/2013 20:20:40 »
I see the replies here of our friends as just being the classical typical cases of study that should be conducted by psychology tout-court, by the psychology of group or crowd psychology : ( Psychology and especially the so-called evolutionary psychology are also dominated by materialism by the way .)
The latter should study these behaviours of our friends here .
Those replies of theirs are not about science , scientific facts , scientific approaches, not even about that false materialism .............it's all about their psyche and group pysche .............
Amazing how they stick to and with each other , even at the expense of science , scientific facts , scientific approaches, logic , reason ..........consciously or sub-consciously ...
It's broadly known in psychology that  the group affects the  thought and the  behaviour thus of its members , even in unreasonable ways sometimes ...
Amazing also how people continue to stick to their beliefs ,no matter what , despite the obvious undeniable evidence against those false beliefs of theirs : or as Nagel said : "The human will to believe is inexhaustible " = the same goes for him also , ironically enough ..
Not to mention that feelings emotions do affect our thought and thus behaviour .
Feelings and emotions are even thoughts-projects -in-the-making in fact :so, that artificial created "wall " or boundary between reason and feelings emotions is just that : artificial .
Besides, the allegation or assumption that reason and feelings emotions are not inseparable  , and that the former  cannot explain the latter are ...history .
In short :
Objectivity is a myth, even at the very level of exact sciences themselves , let alone elsewhere .
Interesting  developments  indeed.
« Last Edit: 12/10/2013 20:40:54 by DonQuichotte »

*

Offline DonQuichotte

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1763
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #546 on: 12/10/2013 20:52:08 »
Since i have been having a day off today , i think i would better go watching those nice comedy series :
The big bang theory haha..........on youtube.
That's better than wasting my time on these stubborn materialist believers friends of ours here ...
I am afraid that even the most subtle pedagogy out there would fail pathetically to change these people's minds about even obvious undeniable facts that go against their own stubborn irrational materialist beliefs ....
Maybe , some real science or life jokes might change their minds  , or i should just try to draw them some pics on the subject   haha , literally , since i am an amateur painter as well .
Maybe , i should sing them a song , post some more poetry , or just perform some ritual sexy harmonious synchronizations oscillations vibrations strip-tease dances for them ,like neurons or ensemble of neurons seem to "do "  haha .

All the best , folks .
It's been entertaining and educational .........you have no idea .
Thanks a lot for just that .
Take care .

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4912
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #547 on: 13/10/2013 01:26:49 »
Quote
Objectivity is a myth

No, it's a desideratum. Not the same thing at all.
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline cheryl j

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1467
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #548 on: 13/10/2013 03:31:54 »


In the above first part of this post of yours , you expressed  your legetimate suspicion skepticism and aversion regarding any race ,nationality ,geography . culture...based ideologies or manufactured illusionary "identities " based on race , ethnicity , sectarianism, geography , cultures , nationalities ...and rightly so, but ,then again, you immediatly went on boosting about the Canadian achievements ...= how paradoxical can you be ?



Um, no,  I was just  kidding around. I was not sincerely bragging about the invention of the paint roller, although, it is quite nifty when you need one.

Wow, please do not insult my relative intelligence ........by lying and by being dishonest in that regard , come on ........
I should be the one "insulting " you ,by raising the issue of nazism, since you yourself admitted that you have some German "blood " running in your veins , or German "genes " in your body , but i won't do that , simply because not all Germans can be blamed for nazism, especially not those post-war German generations ...

I'm just not convinced that your attribution of the invention of science to Islam is purely the result of your  historical curiosity. You clearly have an axe to grind, and you couldn't be more obvious about it.  I wasn't calling you, personally,  a Nazi. I was simply making the point I have rarely seen anything good come  from rekindling these ancient rivalries, and trying to prove which group is superior. It never ends well.
« Last Edit: 13/10/2013 03:37:32 by cheryl j »

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1452
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: What, on Earth, is The Human Consciousness?
« Reply #549 on: 13/10/2013 13:58:15 »
... the non-material processes or the non-material side of reality can be approached by science , indirectly , via a multitude of ways , especially via approaching their  material basis .
Such as what, for example?