thrust does not work in space

  • 203 Replies
  • 59912 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
thrust does not work in space
« on: 03/09/2013 23:39:43 »
the reason why thrust cant work is simple
thrust equals = weight in order to have weight we need gravity.
see its like this in space everything weighs nothing so i would say a rocket weighs 0
or put like this rocket =0
                       thrust=0 because without gravity there is no weight behind the thrust
to cause a reaction so no movement would take place.
on earth if you sit in a chair that has wheels on it and throw a heavy ball you would
move back, and guess why of course because of gravity.....see gravity makes the ball weigh something but if you did the same thing in space you wouldnt move because you and the ball weigh nothing at all .
« Last Edit: 03/09/2013 23:44:46 by truthseeker67 »

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #1 on: 03/09/2013 23:50:27 »
the reason why thrust cant work is simple
thrust equals = weight in order to have weight we need gravity.
You're quite wrong. Space vehicles use thrust in space all the time so you're wrong merely by observation.

Anyway, that is not what thrust is. Thrust is the force exerted when mass is ejected which then has momentum. Since momentum is conserved there must be a back reaction on the rocket expelling the mass. That's Newton's third law. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrust

Thrust has absolutely nothing to do with gravity other than a rocket which has thrust can overcome the force of gravity and escape the gravitational pull of a gravitating body.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #2 on: 04/09/2013 00:13:29 »
look when water comes out of a hosepipe with high pressure it is simply chucking out
weight, and thrust is weight why do you think rocket engines are said to create pounds of thrust, so then what are pounds.....see pounds are weight. the explosive gasses of a rocket engine on earth are chucking more weight out than what the rocket  weighs thats why it goes up. In space the water and the hosepipe wouldnt have any weight so  no recation would take place . Look have you ever asked yourself why all the satalites and space station included are all only in orbit, there is not one item of any sort further than orbit because they cant get there. they call something a space station but in fact it is not in true space it is still in the earths boundarys which we call orbit and guess what thrust works there and guess why?
« Last Edit: 04/09/2013 00:15:44 by truthseeker67 »

*

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6321
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #3 on: 04/09/2013 00:44:26 »
Keep in mind that there is no true "zero-gravity", at least with respect to the space where we've sent rockets and space ships.  See the wikipedia page on microgravity.  The gravity in low earth orbit (where the Hubble and International Space Station are) is just about the same as it is on Earth.

The effect of weightlessness is that of constant freefall, either with an object in orbit such as the satellites around Earth, or coasting in a non-orbital trajectory like the Voyager probes.

In fact, one way to provide artificial gravity in space would be to provide constant thrust, except that we don't have the technology to provide significant amounts of thrust for long periods.

I'm, not quite sure why rockets in the USA are rated with pounds of thrust.  Perhaps Newton's of thrust would be a better measurement which would indicate a force applied to a mass through a distance for a period of time.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #4 on: 04/09/2013 02:05:42 »
i live in the UK and i relate to thrust being in pounds but Newton’s are in the metric system. Since it seems to be the USA that makes a lot of rockets going everywhere or nowhere i think pounds fits the bill here. its just model jet and rocket, pulse jet engines are often in pounds of thrust, Oh yes as long as we are within the earths atmosphere the rocket engine  which is chucking out thrust, weight, pounds more than it weighs to get up there is acting with two important things Gravity is needed to give the thrust weight, imagine seeing a flame out the back of a rocket with no weight no substance behind it just like a blow torch a flame without any force behind it that's not going to move much is it .then we come to the next important thing its called air or atmospheric gasses. the thrust of a rocket engine has to have something to push against it cant push against its self. That would be like bolting an engine with a prop on it to a boat and pointing it at the sail do you think the boat would move? Of course it wouldn't we have created a sealed circuit where no reaction can take place. so in orbit the elements needed for trust to produce momentum still exist, but in true space or outside higher orbit there is a vacuum no air no gasses no gravity not much of anything for thrust to push against and i simply don't believe a rocket can push a against its self using Newton’s third law. In space there is no third law and if i believed there was i wouldn't of started this topic. Not even the rocket plane that was built the x 15 could get free of orbit and into true space when it should of been more than worthy to get there, self contained oxidizer plenty of fuel, plenty of thrust but what happened when they tried to break through the thrust died back and they were forced back to orbit like everything else that's why there's so much space trash round the earth they cant put the satellites further out because they know its impossible

*

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6321
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #5 on: 04/09/2013 03:09:50 »
Consider two blocks with a spring under compression between them, but not attached to the blocks.

[attachment=17916]

In a frictionless environment (on ice, in space, on an air table, whatever), release the spring, and one block goes right, the other goes left.  BOTH blocks move in opposite directions.

That is essentially how a rocket engine works, except the exhaust of the rocket engine (mass) is expelled at high velocity.  While only a little is released at a time, for a large rocket, more mass is lost through the burning rocket fuel and forcing it out at high velocity behind the rocket than the mass of the remaining rocket structure.

Space Junk is around Earth because most of our satellites and space missions have been launched to the area around Earth because that is where they are needed, and it is easier to access.  There have, of course, been a couple of missions to the moon (still technically within Earth's gravity), but probes have also been sent to all of the planets, a couple of comets, and even to dwarf planets, as well as being put into orbit around the sun.  The Voyager probes are now leaving the solar system, and while still under the influence of the sun's gravity for the next thousand years or so, eventually they will eventually pass beyond the sun's gravity, and head towards the next star.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #6 on: 04/09/2013 04:44:02 »
hi cliff nice illustration the coiled spring under tension would work almost anywhere no doubt about it even in deep space i expect. But the spring under tension has two surfaces to act on and push against, pushing on both sides at the same time now you have a reaction. but going back to the thrust coming out of the engine in my mind space being a vacuum and void of anything to push on means that the blast energy  would just be absorbed out into space thrust would have to fire up against something.I see a vacuum as wanting to suck the guts out of something including the thrust leaving the rocket trying to push against its self again. And if we took one block and could compress the spring against one side of the one block in space and release the spring what would happen to the block do you think? would the block leave the spring or would they leave each other or would the block stay and the spring whiz off . Thing is i don't know if we can compare a block and spring to thrust because of the way the energy is released like for example if i was in space and i was holding a cannon ball and flung it away from me very fast do you think i would go in the opposite direction. So lets say that i am the block of wood and the cannon ball is the spring also noting in space me and the ball are not going to weigh much if anything at all and me pushing against the ball as fast as possible really my hands are acting as the spring part,  when this is done on earth you get recoil so i get pushed back but in space things have mass but no weight to act on each other so where is the reaction going to come from to push me back. Momentum in space is a strange thing take a petrol engine the way the crankshaft is weighted and balanced to stop at a certain point. In space that weighted crankshaft wouldn't know where to stop if it could run because it wouldn't weigh anything. So the weight that is produced in pounds of thrust by a rocket engine has got to have something to exert force against to get its forward motion. orbit provides that because it is still earths atmosphere, i mean there's all sorts of elements and various gasses the thrust can act against.
« Last Edit: 04/09/2013 04:48:09 by truthseeker67 »

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #7 on: 04/09/2013 10:18:31 »
look when water comes out of a hosepipe with high pressure it is simply chucking out
weight, and thrust is weight ..
You're confusing force with gravitational force. In Newtonian physics they are different things. Force and weight are different things. Please learn the difference.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #8 on: 04/09/2013 11:59:44 »
yes the forces are different  but lets get back to the thrust in space issue . could a water rocket under high pressure when forcing out its charge into space move forward, would it be said that the rocket would push itself away from its own charge rather than pushing against the void of space in order to move because on earth the charge of water would have weight behind it but would the charge of water in space have weight too!. like on earth a hosepipe will take off under thrust if not held down because its chucking out weight in the form of pounds of thrust .  The more weight it chucks out the faster it wants to go up. Can this weight ratio apply in space where weightlessness dominates . 

*

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6321
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #9 on: 04/09/2013 14:01:47 »
I think the point is that while you may not have weight when in freefall in space, you still maintain the mass which opposes change.

Is a Hydrogen/Oxygen engine a special type of high temperature/pressure water engine?

In a sense, the combustion of the hydrogen/oxygen does occur outside of the rocket.  However, perhaps the idea is that the expanding gas doesn't "disappear" immediately, but presses against the rocket engine bell.

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #10 on: 04/09/2013 14:14:42 »
yes the forces are different  but lets get back to the thrust in space issue . could a water rocket under high pressure when forcing out its charge into space move forward, would it be said that the rocket would push itself away from its own charge rather than pushing against the void of space in order to move because on earth the charge of water would have weight behind it but would the charge of water in space have weight too!. like on earth a hosepipe will take off under thrust if not held down because its chucking out weight in the form of pounds of thrust .  The more weight it chucks out the faster it wants to go up. Can this weight ratio apply in space where weightlessness dominates . 
You seem to be confusing mass with weight. Weight is the effect of gravity acting on the mass of an object. The mass is constant independent of gravity, but weight depends on gravity. On the moon, an astronaut has the same mass as on Earth, but weighs less because there's less gravity acting on his mass. In space, objects have no weight but still have the same mass. You can tell how massive an object is even in space, where it has no weight, by how hard it is to get it moving or slow it down; this is due to its inertia.

You've already had thrust explained to you - Newton's 3rd Law, 'for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction'. A rocket in space throws out exhaust and gets an equal reaction in the other direction. There's no requirement to push against space - it's the same principle as pushing someone away from you on ice, they will slide in one direction, you will slide in the opposite direction.

*

Offline Supercryptid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 606
    • View Profile
    • http://www.angelfire.com/sc2/Trunko
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #11 on: 05/09/2013 01:50:24 »
The fact that spacecraft have been sent to and landed on Venus, Mars and Titan proves that your reasoning is incorrect. That alone should tell you that there is a flaw in your argument (unless one were to propose some kind of inane conspiracy theory about how all of the space agencies of the world have faked these missions...).
----
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for him.

*

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6321
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #12 on: 05/09/2013 06:02:56 »
Even in the vacuum of space, no doubt igniting tons of propellant in the exhaust bell creates transient pressure.

*

Offline Lmnre

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 178
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #13 on: 05/09/2013 17:18:40 »
In space, objects have no weight but still have the same mass.
...and so they develop equipment and methods to measure mass, such as people's masses as part of monitoring their health. Quite the high-tech "bathroom scale". What you don't notice is that, according to Newton's Third Law of Motion, as the person moves "up" and "down", the ISS is moving (ever so slightly) "down" and "up".

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #14 on: 05/09/2013 17:53:49 »
thing is man never went to the moon in the first place alone other planets. For a start when you enter into space the radiation is so strong nothing could survive the trip and live to tell the tale. Watch this folks even if you think its not true its still good from a science fiction point of view enjoy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ra40cCm-BQ

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #15 on: 05/09/2013 20:58:19 »
thing is man never went to the moon in the first place alone other planets. For a start when you enter into space the radiation is so strong nothing could survive the trip and live to tell the tale.
Of course, that's complete nonsense. Funny though.

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4805
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #16 on: 05/09/2013 23:20:00 »
Quote
thrust equals = weight

Not true. Never mind space flight, just look at an aeroplane. Thrust acts forward (assuming the propellor is in the usual place, doing its normal job), weight acts downward. Orthogonal vectors cannot be equal.
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline Supercryptid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 606
    • View Profile
    • http://www.angelfire.com/sc2/Trunko
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #17 on: 06/09/2013 07:48:56 »
thing is man never went to the moon in the first place alone other planets. For a start when you enter into space the radiation is so strong nothing could survive the trip and live to tell the tale. Watch this folks even if you think its not true its still good from a science fiction point of view enjoy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ra40cCm-BQ
Even if your radiation claim was true, it ignores the fact that such radiation would not be an issue with the unmanned probes that have been sent to other places in the Solar System. What about the Venera probes that landed on Venus? The Pathfinder, Phoenix, Vikings 1 and 2 and other landers on Mars? Huygens on Titan? The Luna landers on the Moon? Those machines had to get there somehow, and they didn't do it by teleportation.
----
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for him.

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #18 on: 06/09/2013 08:55:24 »
The radiation dose for the Apollo moonshot astronauts was less than the allowable yearly dose for nuclear workers. Full details are in this NASA report.

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #19 on: 06/09/2013 09:38:32 »
could you imagine all the heat the vessels would absorb in space even with the protection they claim they have, keeping them cool just on batteries or whatever i know they use materials to reflect heat but even a mirror in the sun can get very hot.The outer shell of a spacecraft is acting a bit like a flask but sooner or later that heat is coming through. Read about the damage and problems the sun and radiation causes the satellites in orbit.

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4805
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #20 on: 06/09/2013 10:26:33 »
It's all well known and entirely predictable (apart from the occasional solar flare, but we have a pretty good idea of the maximum intensity of those). We use radiation-hardened components in near-earth satellites and design circuits to fail safe when irradiated - a common problem with nuclear power plant and some military equipment.   

Obviously the side of a spacecraft facing the sun gets hot, just like the planets do. But what do you think happens on the other side? Unsurprisingly, if you rotate a vessel somewhere near the earth's orbit, it ends up at somewhere near the temperature of the earth.

If you really are a truthseeker, try starting from the obvious, the commonplace, and your own observations. Anything else is of dubious validity.
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline Supercryptid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 606
    • View Profile
    • http://www.angelfire.com/sc2/Trunko
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #21 on: 06/09/2013 16:59:48 »
So you really believe that no spacecraft have ever been sent to other planets? That there's some giant conspiracy in place that's been going on for over 50 years in which no whistle-blowers have ever come forward, no one has slipped up, there have been no leaks, etc? Let's not forget that the United States is not the only country that has sent spacecraft beyond Earth orbit, so this has to be a world-wide conspiracy with cooperation between multiple space agencies (including Russia and the US during the Cold War...). How is this rational?

Forget it guys, you can't argue with this type.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2013 17:02:02 by Supercryptid »
----
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for him.

*

lean bean

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #22 on: 06/09/2013 17:26:34 »
the reason why thrust cant work is simple thrust equals = weight in order to have weight we need gravity.
see its like this in space everything weighs nothing so i would say a rocket weighs 0
or put like this rocket =0
                       thrust=0 because without gravity there is no weight behind the thrust

 truthseeker67
According to your own logic here, both rocket and fuel have weight in interstellar space.
If your rocket has mass,then it’s gravitating, 'pulling' on the fuel in the tank, or the hot gaseous 'stuff ' shooting out the rear. So, because of this gravitating 'pull' your fuel as a weight relative to the rocket.
The fuel, hot or cold, has mass, so, it 'pulls' on the rocket, and the rocket has a weight relative to the fuel. Have I got your logic right? I’m forgetting about speeds here.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2013 17:28:05 by lean bean »

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #23 on: 07/09/2013 22:18:02 »
After seeing the evidence of fakery in NASA pictures and videos I decided to investigate the theoretical basis of rockets in space. What I found on the Internet were mainly tricks, frauds and sleights of hand, name-calling and attacks used to confuse the issue and hide the facts. Bypassing all of that and doing original research I have come to the conclusion that rockets cannot function in space according the descriptions/formulas used by NASA and related parties.

With neither theory on its side nor reliable, verifiable, repeatable scientific experiments on its side the idea of rocket thrust in my estimation remains a fiction presented to the world as an achievement: a modern day Marco Polo story.

I will try to present my findings with a minimum of maths and formula as these are often used to drawn us into traps, causing us to argue the minutiae of red herrings or chase ghosts.

There are 4 major ideas on presented on the Internet, including NASA web sites, as to how rockets generate thrust in space
1. Newton’s 3rd Law : for every force there is an equal and opposite
2. Newtons’s 2nd Law : Force = Mass x Acceleration
3. Conservation of Momentum
4. The use of a specialized nozzle to accelerate the gas inside the ship, concentrate and aim the gas jet.

The problem with applying Newton’s 3rd is that the rocket’s propellant does not generate force in a vacuum according to the laws of physics and chemistry. If the force of the propellant is 0 then Newton’s 3rd states that
Force on Rocket=-Force of Gas.
If Force of Gas = 0 the rocket does not move.

Why doesn’t the propellant generate any force, it's expanding, right?
There is something known as “Free Expansion” or the “Joule-Thomson” effect, named after James Prescott Joule and J.J. Thompson two of the founders of the field of Physical Chemistry.
http://www.etomica.org/app/modules/site ... ound2.html
Free Expansion states that when a pressurized gas is exposed to a vacuum the gas expanding into the vacuum without any work being done. The gas is not “pulled” or “sucked” into the vacuum nor is it “pushed” out of the high-pressure container. In other words no work is done, no heat or energy is lost.
This result has been experimentally verified numerous times since its discovery in the 1850’s.
[for example a paper in the Journal of Physical Chemistry from 1902: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/j150043a002]

As if Free Expansion wasn’t enough to invalidate the theory of rockets producing a force in a vacuum there is also a result from thermodynamics:
Work = Pressure x Change_in_Volume
that is easily found searching for “W=PV”
http://lsc.ucdavis.edu/~ahart/Alicia2B/Thermo.pdf
If the pressure of a system is 0 then the work done by the expanding gas into that system is 0. Gas expanding in a vacuum doing no work agrees with Free Expansion. This can also be understood as the gas meets no resistance as it exits into the vacuum and thus transfers neither heat nor energy to its surroundings. If the gas loses neither heat nor energy then it has done no work.

At this point we have a rocket with high-pressure gas generated from liquid fuel that can release the gas into a vacuum but has no way to produce a force while doing so. As soon as the nozzle is opened the gasses escape without doing any work. Therefore the 3rd Law is rendered useless.

As it turns out NASA does not fall into the 3rd Law trap (nor does it go around correcting all the sites who do) instead claiming that thrust of a space rocket is generated using what I call The Wrong Formula, an egregious farce of Newton's 2nd law.

To recap: Newton’s 3rd Law, the number one response on the Internet to how a rocket generates thrust in space, is invalid in this context. NASA itself avoids using Newton’s 3rd Law as the reason why their rockets work so well in space choosing to use Newton’s 2nd Law instead.  NASA’s use the 2nd Law is equally invalid and in fact a hideous misrepresentation of the laws of the laws of physics that would give a freshman college student a failing grade yet earns NASA an "A" thanks to its pretty pictures, dramatic story lines, and gutsy champions, the astronauts.


   
     
   
   


*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #24 on: 07/09/2013 22:46:13 »
After seeing the evidence of fakery in NASA pictures and videos I decided to investigate the theoretical basis of rockets in space. What I found on the Internet were mainly tricks, frauds and sleights of hand, name-calling and attacks used to confuse the issue and hide the facts. Bypassing all of that and doing original research I have come to the conclusion that rockets cannot function in space according the descriptions/formulas used by NASA and related parties.
Wow. So how did all those satellites get positioned up there, outside the atmosphere?

Are all the American, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, and European (did I miss anyone?) space shots faked?

Why would they do that? - I feel so cheated...
« Last Edit: 07/09/2013 22:48:12 by dlorde »

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #25 on: 08/09/2013 00:01:14 »
of course the satellites are up there if you fired a canon ball from a massive gun that be up there too heheh only joking .

 Tom Wolfe's book "The Right Stuff" documents high altitude flight tests with rocket powered aircraft that would invariably fail in the thin air and plummet back to earth. Chuck Yeager almost died in a NF-104A rocket plane failure while attempting to set a height record. These planes were liquid fuel rockets and not air-fed jets.

Why would NASA claim to be able to send rockets into space when the USAF couldn't get the same technology into even the upper atmosphere?

Why did Chuck Yeager not join the space program? Did he know it was a hoax?
And like I said the x15 rocket plane was more than worthy with its own contained
Oxidizer but couldn’t make the trip.
I think its time to wake up folks and smell the coffee. I know it’s a very elegant fantasy to think of space travel but it only happens in the movies so enjoy them.

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #26 on: 08/09/2013 14:55:29 »
of course the satellites are up there if you fired a canon ball from a massive gun that be up there too heheh only joking .
Of course you're joking; because, apart from the satellites, you also have to account for these missions.

*

lean bean

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #27 on: 08/09/2013 17:08:38 »
Truthy #4
Quote
the thrust of a rocket engine has to have something to push against it cant push against its self.
The problem with applying Newton’s 3rd is that the rocket’s propellant does not generate force in a vacuum according to the laws of physics and chemistry.
Free Expansion states that when a pressurized gas is exposed to a vacuum the gas expanding into the vacuum without any work being done. The gas is not “pulled” or “sucked” into the vacuum nor is it “pushed” out of the high-pressure container. In other words no work is done,

truthseeker67
Imagine a hollow cube in interstellar space, at the centre of this cube there is an explosion. Each inner wall of the cube will receive an equal pressure (push) from the expanding gasses of that explosion, and so the cube does not move in any direction.

Take away one wall of that cube, and repeat the central explosion.
Again, the gaseous particles hit all walls with equal pressure except the missing wall. The pressure on the wall opposite that missing wall is not countered, and so the cube moves in the direction opposite to the missing wall.
Thrust in interstellar space.

« Last Edit: 08/09/2013 17:10:58 by lean bean »

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #28 on: 08/09/2013 20:38:41 »
hi leanbean i can see what you mean with the cube it just when i look at photos of satellites in space the backgrounds are always completely black no stars are ever present in the pics look at this one of the  Hubble telescope taken from the shuttle heres the link look at the pic and enlarge it see what you think  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #29 on: 08/09/2013 20:59:15 »
... when i look at photos of satellites in space the backgrounds are always completely black no stars are ever present in the pics look at this one of the  Hubble telescope taken from the shuttle heres the link look at the pic and enlarge it see what you think  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope
The brightness of the light reflected from the satellite that means the exposure is necessarily too short to register the starfield.

Check out this site, it will explain a lot of stuff you don't seem to understand, such as the absence of stars in many photos.
« Last Edit: 08/09/2013 21:01:29 by dlorde »

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4805
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #30 on: 08/09/2013 22:01:29 »
Blimey! So my transatlantic phone link, GPS navigation systems, and even television, are all the products of a massive conspiracy!

Fair enough, but why do the fakers and conspirators take so much trouble to help me run my business, fly and drive from point to point, and watch The Simpsons? And how do they find the time to do it for everyone else as well?  And why do they bother to introduce such long transmission time delays, when I would have been perfectly happy thinking it was done with a direct cable?  It's a great service, and ridiculously cheap. I'm amazed.
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline CliffordK

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 6321
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #31 on: 09/09/2013 08:42:18 »
I watched the lunar conspiracy theory video.  They did make some interesting points.  However, one might be tempted to ask where all the moon rocks came from??? 

Here are some "new" photos of the landing sites on the moon.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/revisited/
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #32 on: 09/09/2013 09:32:26 »
when i started this post i never doubted that satellites were not up there. Of course i know they orbit the earth. The topic is thrust doesn't work in space true space and all the satellites are in lower orbit where i do believe thrust works. I think people either haven't read my post from the beginning or have read it and forgot what i said only a page ago.

Oh yes Cliff was looking at what you posted me and was also checking out the camera thing i can see that the correct shutter speed and exposure time must be right for a given situation in order for small illuminated objects to show in background.

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4805
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #33 on: 09/09/2013 10:31:15 »
So, uniquely among mankind, you do not understand the principle of conservation of momentum, but you simultaneously believe that satellites are in orbit.

You should ask yourself, therefore, what is keeping them up there? Everything I have ever flown has either been lighter than air or fitted with wings. Do satellites, which are heavier than air and have no wings, have some kind of magic power that we ordinary aviators and engineers don't know about? Why don't we use it for everyday travel? 
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #34 on: 09/09/2013 11:17:19 »
when i started this post i never doubted that satellites were not up there. Of course i know they orbit the earth. The topic is thrust doesn't work in space true space and all the satellites are in lower orbit where i do believe thrust works.
If thrust only works with air to push against, it would become less efficient with altitude, so that at low Earth orbit, there wouldn't be enough atmosphere for thrust to be effective. That would mean a rocket would need so much propellant to reach orbital velocity or escape velocity, it would never get off the ground.

Returning to reality - what about the geostationary communications & weather satellites at 35,786km out? they need an orbit change to achieve circular geostationary orbit (see Geostationary Transfer Orbit). This requires a thruster (rocket engine) burn - in space.

What about the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO),the  Global Geospace Science (GGS) WIND, and the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) in unstable halo orbits at the L1 Lagrangian point?

Both geostationary and L1 satellites require orbital station-keeping, due to orbital instabilities (other satellites also need occasional orbital or attitudinal adjustments), and this also requires the use of thrusters - which are rocket engines.

Assuming you are serious and not trolling, your persistence in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence has the hallmarks of delusion - a delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary.

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #35 on: 09/09/2013 14:30:26 »
Quote from: truthseeker67
Why did Chuck Yeager not join the space program? Did he know it was a hoax?
Read a book and learn that he wanted to be an astronatu but wasn't qualified. I.e. NASA required astronauts to have a college education, not simply a highschool education, to be an astronaut. Simple, huh?

I've ignored the rest of your posts because it's crystal clear to me that you have absolutely no idea about what you're talling about. Every single thought that you've posted is wrong.

Let this one go, folks. It's ot worth your time arguing with him. He doesn't know enough basic physics to carry on a simple conversation.
« Last Edit: 09/09/2013 16:48:17 by Pmb »

*

lean bean

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #36 on: 09/09/2013 16:41:26 »
hi leanbean i can see what you mean with the cube it just when i look at photos of satellites in space the backgrounds are always completely black no stars are ever present in the pics look at this one of the  Hubble telescope taken from the shuttle heres the link look at the pic and enlarge it see what you think  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope
Why do you link to a photo of Hubble, which is in low earth orbit, and then make the point of saying there's 'no stars' in that photo. Have you changed your mind now and saying things can't even be in low earth orbit because the absence of  stars proves hubble is not in space at all??

Truthy
Quote
when i started this post i never doubted that satellites were not up there. Of course i know they orbit the earth. The topic is thrust doesn't work in space true space and all the satellites are in lower orbit where i do believe thrust works.
Ttruthy
Quote
hi leanbean i can see what you mean with the cube

So I didn't convince you about thrust in interstellar space? aho. What's do you think is wrong about the cube explanation of thrust?


 
« Last Edit: 09/09/2013 16:53:55 by lean bean »

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #37 on: 11/09/2013 10:47:22 »
Okay. It’s time, once and for all, to show in detail why is wrong. In the very first sentence in this thread he writes
Quote from: truthseeker67
the reason why thrust cant work is simple
thrust equals = weight in order to have weight we need gravity.
see its like this in space everything weighs nothing so i would say a rocket weighs 0
or put like this rocket =0
His error is the invalid assumption that “thrust equals weight.” I explained this all too simple fact to him and he didn’t understand it. Nobody can use an invalid assumption to prove anything. He tried to prove me wrong by arguing, wrongly, that
Quote from: truthseeker67
look when water comes out of a hosepipe with high pressure it is simply chucking out
weight, ..
truthseeker67 = A hosepipe does not “chuck out” weight since that’s a meaningless statement.

And your comment right here requires special attention. You admit that water coming out of a hose causes force to be exerted on the hose in the direction opposite to the direction the water is coming out of. The problem with your argument is that the force exerted by the water is independent of the direction the water is ejected. It therefore cannot depend on the force of gravity and therefore cannot depend on gravity

Quote from: truthseeker67
…and thrust is weight ..
This invalid belief you keep trying to pass on is the source of your misconceptions on this topic. I.e. you simply don’t understand the meaning of the term “thrus” or “gravity”

Quote from: truthseeker67
.. do you think rocket engines are said to create pounds of thrust,…
I know that they do. It’s you who don’t know why they do.

Quote from: truthseeker67
… so then what are pounds …
I’d say to look it up but you keep refusing to do so. You don’t seem to like using dictionaries. Probably because they prove you wrong.

The term pound is the British unit of force whereas the SI unit is the Newton. See? You don’t know what it mean!

Quote from: truthseeker67
.....see pounds are weight.;.
Why don’t you do so yourself?
And your example contradicts your assumption since the water in a hosepipe will work even in the absence of gravity. Had you taken my advice and actually looked up the term in a dictionary or a physics text then you’d have learned that. But you didn’t, did you? You didn’t want to look it up because you’d see that I was right and you were wrong!
If you knew how a hose spitting out water caused there to be a force exerted back on it then you’d understand the error of your ways. Since you don’t know why then that’s proof enough for everyone to understand why you’re so wrong.

There are two definitions of the term weight. One is defined at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight
Quote
weight - the weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity.
The other is defined in The equivalence principle and the question of weight by Kenneth Nordtvedt Jr., Am. J. Phys., 43(3), Mar. (1975) [http://link.aip.org/link/ajpias/v43/i3/p256/s1] which reads
Quote
The weight of a body is meant to be the forces (e.g. the compression of a spring scale) required to either support the body in a gravitational field (gravitational weight) or to accelerate a body relative to an inertial system.
Quote from: truthseeker67
..because without gravity there is no weight behind the thrust.
Oy vey! You keep saying this and it’s not true.
The rest of what you say is nonsense.

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #38 on: 11/09/2013 11:17:18 »
Quote from: truthseeker67
could you imagine all the heat the vessels would absorb in space even with the protection they claim they have, keeping them cool just on batteries or whatever i know they use materials to reflect heat but even a mirror in the sun can get very hot. The outer shell of a spacecraft is acting a bit like a flask but sooner or later that heat is coming through. Read about the damage and problems the sun and radiation causes the satellites in orbit.
All of this is extremely wrong. Scientists knew how wrong this was long before they put satellites into orbit. And you admit that scientists put satellites into orbit so you must know how wrong it is.

The complete explanation regarding cosmic rays is given here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays

The other forms of radiation spoken about in this context comes from forms. They are;

Electromagnetic radiation (gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet rays, light waves, infrared rays, radio waves)

Beta radiation - electrons

Alpha radiation – nuclei of He atoms

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #39 on: 11/09/2013 11:21:16 »
The most obvious reason why truthseeker67 is wrong comes from his own example; the water hose. Let the water coming out of a firehose be pointed onto and at a person. The force on that person, i.e. the force exerted on the person by the water, would cause the person to topple over due to the force the water exerts on the person. This is due to the time rate of change on momentu that the person exerts on the water.

*

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4805
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #40 on: 11/09/2013 11:24:02 »
The fundamental problem seems to be that our correspondent does not understand the difference between mass and weight. Therefore any talk of force and momentum is wasted on him.

Clearly the last 2000 years of scientific discovery and education have not penetrated the fog of misunderstanding perpetrated by Aristotle, Galileo died in vain, and Newton was just another farmer with an orchard.

Fortunately for the rest of us, Newtonian physics seems to work pretty well everywhere. But there's no point in arguing against a conviction. Just beware of anyone calling himself Truthseeker who offers to fly, drive or shoot anything for you. 
helping to stem the tide of ignorance

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #41 on: 11/09/2013 12:03:06 »
The fundamental problem seems to be that our correspondent does not understand the difference between mass and weight. Therefore any talk of force and momentum is wasted on him.

Clearly the last 2000 years of scientific discovery and education have not penetrated the fog of misunderstanding perpetrated by Aristotle, Galileo died in vain, and Newton was just another farmer with an orchard.

Fortunately for the rest of us, Newtonian physics seems to work pretty well everywhere. But there's no point in arguing against a conviction. Just beware of anyone calling himself Truthseeker who offers to fly, drive or shoot anything for you. 
alancalverd, my good man! I couldn't have said it better myself, so from now on I won't. Thank you so much!

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #42 on: 11/09/2013 16:21:17 »
Let's try to boil down just why a properly executed fuel explosion within a craft would not be able to move the craft.

If there were a successful chemical explosion or comparable force outside the craft, and at its rear, it should propel the craft forward at least a small amount. However, if the explosion is internal — as we are led to believe — this would cause equal work in all directions and hence do nothing except stress the inside of the craft.

Only by somehow releasing a strategic percentage of the explosion to the infinitely permissive vacuum would the remainder do any work against the ship and cause it to move. But how could this be accomplished using the same rockets that are meant to propel the ship via thrust against air pressure?

Given that these "maneuvering in space" rockets are different rockets for a different purpose, safely nestled amongst the original Earth-based rockets, we are supposed to believe that the force of their internal explosions alone is moving and directing the craft in space, rather than thrust against anything as it works on Earth. So I guess we are meant to believe that NASA has found a way to transition their crafts' functions — as they ascend — from Earth physics to vacuum physics. I guess this would be a delicate process given that in the vacuum:

- conventional explosions would not be fed by adequate oxygen
- air pressure could no longer be used for lift
and
- lack of pressure outside the ship would cause extreme stress on the inside of all mechanisms with pressure

In other words, the amusing little jets of gas we see exiting the craft for 'course correction' cannot possibly be what they look like: just a gas being released into the vacuum. They must instead be representations of an internal, highly controlled and precise explosive force aimed at the inside of the craft itself, and the "jet" pictured is merely the residual energy that must escape to prevent the chamber from blasting open?

Do we have any schematics of how the.. "we are in the vacuum now" jets are supposed to work, and fit in/amongst the other functions of the craft?

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #43 on: 11/09/2013 17:37:24 »
... how could this be accomplished using the same rockets that are meant to propel the ship via thrust against air pressure?
There's your problem.

Rockets work the same way (action-reaction) in air or space. They don't work better by 'thrusting against air pressure'; if anything, air resistance against a rocket makes it less effective in air, requiring more fuel.

The fuels used in rockets don't need external oxygen (neither do most 'conventional' explosions); solid fuels have an oxidizer mixed in, liquid fuels are usually hypergolic, i.e. two liquids that combust when mixed. Some thrusters may use compressed gas or electromagnetically accelerated plasma (ion engines).

This is all basic school-level physics.
« Last Edit: 11/09/2013 18:55:02 by dlorde »

*

lean bean

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #44 on: 11/09/2013 19:31:01 »
If there were a successful chemical explosion or comparable force outside the craft, and at its rear, it should propel the craft forward at least a small amount.
The explosion chamber of a rocket engine is open to space on one side via the nozzle.
Truthy
Quote
However, if the explosion is internal — as we are led to believe — this would cause equal work in all directions and hence do nothing except stress the inside of the craft.
You forgot to mention the missing wall, so it is open to space. On a rocket that opening would be a nozzle or something bigger.

Thruthy
Quote
In other words, the amusing little jets of gas we see exiting the craft for 'course correction' cannot possibly be what they look like: just a gas being released into the vacuum. They must instead be representations of an internal, highly controlled and precise explosive force aimed at the inside of the craft itself,
Do you mean the explosive pressure on the front of the chamber is pushing the rocket forward because that forward thrust is not countered because of the rear opening in the chamber wall called a nozzle?

What was your point about the 'no stars' in the Hubble photo?
« Last Edit: 11/09/2013 19:33:23 by lean bean »

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #45 on: 12/09/2013 03:13:36 »
Quote from: dlorde
This is all basic school-level physics.
And that's the problem. His lack of understanding of what thrust is has led him to believe all sorts of things. I've made many attempts to get him to look up the meaning of the term but those requests were ignored. I have no idea why but I imagine that if I had to learn what they were then he'd have to admit he made an error. In this case it appears that he thought he could prove something known to be quite true as wrong merely by changing the definition. That's a mark of pseudoscience if I ever heard one!
« Last Edit: 14/09/2013 12:15:58 by Pmb »

*

truthseeker67

  • Guest
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #46 on: 14/09/2013 19:27:36 »
someone just show me an experiment of a rocket working in a vacuum never mind the theory lets just see the reality .

*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #47 on: 14/09/2013 19:55:20 »
Quote from: truthseeker67
someone just show me an experiment of a rocket working in a vacuum never mind the theory lets just see the reality .
Do you actually believe that every scientist here has a list of every experiment ever done in his mind readily recallable? Sorry but it doesn't work that way. Especially with something so simple that nobody needs an experiment to be done in order to know what will happen in a vacuum. I'm actually unable to understand how people think a rocket works in the atmosphere (but not in a vacuum).

To actually do such an experiment is very trivial. College class rooms have a glass bell from which the atmosphere can re readibly vacuumed out. A rubber hose can be left in. When air is let back in there will be a force on the hose from the air being let back in.
 Analysis of the hoses motion will tell you if truthseeker67 is right or every single physicist alive today (including me) and their teachers are correct. I'm betting on every physicicist alive today. Especially since they understand nature and truthseeker67 is not even willing to look up the term "thrust" in a dictionary or provide a realistic argument for his guesses. I know that I'm right because I know elementary physics. This is simply the principle conservation of momentum at work. It's what makes a person recoild back when he's hit with a sack of potatoes when one is lobbed at him.

So, still not willing to learn physics yet, huh?
« Last Edit: 14/09/2013 19:59:46 by Pmb »

*

Offline dlorde

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1441
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
    • View Profile
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #48 on: 14/09/2013 21:13:21 »
someone just show me an experiment of a rocket working in a vacuum never mind the theory lets just see the reality .
The experiment is demonstrated every time a rocket fires in space - which happens often. Satellites, probes, space labs - they all do it.





*

Offline Pmb

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: thrust does not work in space
« Reply #49 on: 15/09/2013 02:28:25 »
Quote from: dlorde
]
The experiment is demonstrated every time a rocket fires in space - which happens often. Satellites, probes, space labs - they all do it.
His problem is (1) he doesn't want to pick up a dictionary and look up the term "thrust" to see how it's really defined as opposed to how he wants it to be defined and (2) he thinks there is a worldwide conspiracy to fool him, especially when it comes to communications satilites and the GPS system. All he has to do is contact NASA and they'd tell him where those experiments were done for which satelites/rocket engines but that'd prove him wrong too. That's not his way it seems.