The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Debunking Physics
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Debunking Physics

  • 3 Replies
  • 1822 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline paradigm (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 16
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Debunking Physics
« on: 19/09/2018 07:19:16 »
Debunking Physics and Discovering Forever
(A Rational and Materialist Perspective of the Fundamental nature of the Universe)
Stephen Mooney

“… in all of science, and especially in empirical science, the regulatory idea of consistency plays a crucial role in the dynamics of scientific progress.”
(Jesus Mosterin - The role of consistency in empirical science)

For a completely consistent and connected understanding of the Universe, you need to begin from the most fundamental rational and materialist perspective that’s possible. With its over-riding commitment to mathematics and measurements and other abstractions, the physics establishment is an abstractionist paradigm that’s not completely rational and materialist and doesn’t begin from the most fundamental perspective. By adopting a completely rational and materialist and truly fundamental perspective, many of the theories and interpretations of the abstractionist paradigm are overthrown and this leads to the realization of new fundamental laws and the infinite existence and reoccurring nature of everything. This has a revolutionary effect on cosmology and a profound impact upon the way in which we can understand the context of Human existence.

The above is the introduction to the essay which is located at <<<LINK REMOVED>>>


« Last Edit: 19/09/2018 14:07:49 by Colin2B »
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Debunking Physics
« Reply #1 on: 19/09/2018 10:23:34 »
Please refrain from using the forum as your personal soapbox. This section of the forum is for discussing mainstream physics.. This topic is temporarily locked until a proper home for it can be found on the forum.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5272
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 439 times
    • View Profile
Re: Debunking Physics
« Reply #2 on: 19/09/2018 14:05:33 »
In addition to what @jeffreyH wrote, can I remind you of the following extracts from our a ceptable useage policy, which you agreed to when you joined:

“The site is not for evangelising your own pet theory.  It is perfectly acceptable that you should post your own theory up for discussion, but if all you want to do is promote your own idea and are not inviting critical debate about it, then that will not be acceptable.

It is not acceptable simply to post material onto this forum that you have posted elsewhere, except where the post is specifically pertinent to an ongoing thread.  If you start a thread with a post that is for all practical purposes the same as you have posted elsewhere, we will generally assume that you are evangelising, and will act accordingly.”

Looking at your previous posts it is clear that you are not engaging in science based discussion, but using each post to give a link to your pet theory.
If you continue to do this you will be banned. In the meantime all links will be removed.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11428
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 671 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Debunking Physics
« Reply #3 on: 20/09/2018 00:00:06 »
The difference between philosophy and bullshit is that one does not occur in nature, and is therefore of no interest to a scientist..
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know that the "laws" of physics are really laws, i.e. true everywhere?

Started by rainwildmanBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 32
Views: 21546
Last post 27/04/2008 11:14:42
by bitistoll
Why has the physics forum got sexier topics than the chemistry forum?

Started by Mr AndrewBoard Chemistry

Replies: 61
Views: 41559
Last post 03/03/2009 03:39:33
by Chemistry4me
Is the most profound quest in all of physics the "Theory of Everything"?

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 5775
Last post 18/08/2019 09:02:00
by Hayseed
The expression "A moment in time" does it exist in physics?

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 10860
Last post 03/07/2013 09:59:09
by yor_on
Should we consider quantum physics and general relativity as two seperate systems, active in the same universe?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 4996
Last post 24/03/2018 00:23:29
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.18 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.