Is this a reasonable representation of gravitational feedback?

  • 3 Replies
  • 1072 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4072
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
I have calculated the gravitational feedback of 99 earths side by side and each touching at the surface much like a string of beads arrangement. The graph shows the increase in gravitation through the chain of earth masses from one end to the other.
« Last Edit: 21/02/2014 13:11:34 by jeffreyH »

*

Offline RD

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8175
    • View Profile
Surely in the middle of the chain the the gravitational force from each half would cancel each other out,
  like at L1 ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point#L1

*

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4072
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Surely in the middle of the chain the the gravitational force from each half would cancel each other out,
  like at L1 ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point#L1

Yes that would be a valid observation if I were modelling the field in both directions. This is a simplified unidirectional representation. I could plot a two way feedback but that would not be my original intention. This may sound like a strange way of viewing this but I have my reasons for doing so at this point in time. Look at it as if each earth is added one at a time and we measure g as we go along the line.
« Last Edit: 21/02/2014 14:26:29 by jeffreyH »

*

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4072
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Taking into account the gravitational cancellation we now have the following. Each point is a measurement of g at the point where one earth touches the next at the surface. The yellow plot shows g at each point after cancellation. If combined with the model for escape velocity from the centre of a planet it is assumed that the yellow plot would then resemble a wave equation with the amplitude varying away from the combined centre of gravity. This assumption of course may be wrong.
« Last Edit: 22/02/2014 22:44:02 by jeffreyH »