The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How can Maxwell state the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How can Maxwell state the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero?

  • 5 Replies
  • 3316 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MathiasArendrup (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
How can Maxwell state the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero?
« on: 27/02/2014 09:36:51 »
As far as i can understand, maxwells second equation states that the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. It may be just me misunderstanding the law, but magnets do create a magnetic field around them which attracts opposite dipoles of other magnets right? So how can it be equal to zero?


Thanks in advance
« Last Edit: 01/03/2014 10:53:52 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: Maxwell 2nd Equation
« Reply #1 on: 27/02/2014 12:38:59 »
Dipole is the key word here.  A non-zero divergence tells you that sources exist that send field lines radially outwards (to infinity), whereas dipoles have looping field lines that go out, curve around, and come back to join themselves. 

And as you point out, dipoles can certainly interact and attract each other, but that has to do with the nature of dipoles and the force law rather than Maxwell's equation.
Logged
 

Offline MathiasArendrup (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Maxwell 2nd Equation
« Reply #2 on: 27/02/2014 19:34:04 »
Aha, so you can sort of say, that the dipoles equal eachother out and therefore the divergence is zero?
Logged
 

Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: Maxwell 2nd Equation
« Reply #3 on: 27/02/2014 21:46:35 »
Kind of--but an electric dipole exists and the divergence of E is non-zero.  What it's really telling you is that the simplest source of a magnetic field is a dipole, whereas the divergence of E being non-zero tells you that the simplest source of the E-field is a monopole.  Or put another way, if you try to cut a magnet in half to separate the dipole into two monopoles, you'll end up with two smaller dipoles.  Whereas you can chop an electric dipole in half to get two monopoles.
Logged
 

Offline MathiasArendrup (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Maxwell 2nd Equation
« Reply #4 on: 28/02/2014 07:06:41 »
Thanks! I think i got it pretty well now, i think i didnt quite understand the principle of divergence before, but i do now. Nice explanation thanks
Logged
 



Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 12 times
    • View Profile
Re: Maxwell 2nd Equation
« Reply #5 on: 28/02/2014 12:53:44 »
Another way to say the same that JP wrote: take a closed surface in a magnetic field (for example a sphere): wherever you put that surface, whatever its dimensions, the magnetic field lines entering it are exactly the same (in number) which exit.
You can't *always* do it with electric field: take a closed surface around a single positive electric charge: there will be only field lines exiting the surface, no line entering. The opposite with a negative charge: only lines entering, not exiting.
Divergence is the flux of the field per unit volume inside the surface, in the limit for the volume going to zero. Flux = integral of the field scalar dS, the element of the surface. This is the matematical description of what I have written in words.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Does gravitational energy generate a gravitational field?

Started by Richard777Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 761
Last post 26/02/2018 21:59:08
by opportunity
Can gravitational slowing of time be in neutral gravitational field?

Started by simplifiedBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 4733
Last post 05/09/2011 09:59:53
by imatfaal
does candle light produce electromagnatic field....same as light bulb..?

Started by tareggBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 2394
Last post 15/09/2013 22:29:48
by distimpson
Can electro-magnet make an electric field to charge mobiles and other gadgets?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 1105
Last post 21/08/2016 10:23:53
by Paolo80
Will an electro-magnet make an electric field to charge cellphone or other gadgets?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 796
Last post 22/08/2016 11:23:01
by thedoc
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.142 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.