0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Within the diamond structure, the distance between any two electrons is larger than the distance between any electron and carbon nucleus, if f=kq1q2/r^2 stands.I cannot imagine such structure in 3d space. It seems logically impossible. What do you know/think? Thanks!
Presumably you are talking about conduction-band electrons?
How could electrons get to so close to each other under super strong repulsion force between them?
Let's take a look at gold atom, so many electrons around nucleus, how is another gold atom able to even get to closer? Any two au atoms should repel each other.
Quote Let's take a look at gold atom, so many electrons around nucleus, how is another gold atom able to even get to closer? Any two au atoms should repel each other. Would I not be right in thinking that atoms (as distinct from ions) are neutral, so there would be no net repulsive force?
Neutral atoms do not attract each other electrostatically, the way ions would. However, especially with large atoms, like gold, there are still electrostatic forces that attract them (see London Dispersion Force: ...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN
It is worth pointing out that diamond does revert back to graphite (very slowly) when the pressure is released.
No scientist is dumb enough to give away the real secret of how to use carbon to make diamond.
How much pressure will be enough to push electrons into nucleus? Isn't between them is 99.9999% empty space and strong attraction force?
In graphite, each carbon atom is bonded to 3 other carbon atoms, and they are all in a plane. Each atom has two electrons that are as low in energy as they can get (1s orbital). The next highest in energy (3 electrons per atom) are shared between two neighboring carbon atoms (one can think of these as sigma bonds), and the highest energy electrons (1 electron per carbon) are free to exist anywhere in the lattice (one can think of these as an extended pi bond or a conduction band).Is this a joke? Who seriously believe it? Or it is the best model one can get?
Or is it the best model one can get?
Besides pulling out quantum laws, no one has an logical answer to: What force keeps opposite charges apart as electron and proton in atoms?
Quote from: jccc on 05/08/2014 17:34:49Besides pulling out quantum laws, no one has an logical answer to: What force keeps opposite charges apart as electron and proton in atoms?Perhaps this is a reason not to discount "quantum laws"
All I care is the real structure of atoms, may carbon or gold or hydrogen.
Isn't force the mechanism for everything?
Yes. If there were more or less, it wouldn't be carbon. And don't confuse theory with reality: science is not religion.
You can ionize carbon atoms with radiation. Up to six electrons can be removed, leaving a nucleus with a charge of +6. That is how we can experimentally verify there are six electrons.It is also a definitional thing. It is carbon because there are six protons in the nucleus. To be a neutral carbon atom, it must have six electrons.
Quote from: alancalverd on 23/08/2014 22:58:26Yes. If there were more or less, it wouldn't be carbon. And don't confuse theory with reality: science is not religion.How do you count 6 electrons? What is reality? QM?