Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion (corrected)

  • 53 Replies
  • 11093 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile

Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion (corrected)
« on: 13/11/2014 01:28:26 »

 What was supposed to be the most simple question in physics turns out to be the greatest  unsolved  mystery in physics: what is gravity, why is gravity  all attraction, no repulsion?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth? According to Eminent Scientist, Isaac Newton, gravity is “attraction”. But the great man stopped there,  cannot or did not elaborate why an apple fell on his laps, why everything on earth falls back to earth but  he saw correctly that the  same force that makes an apple fall on his lap is the same force that makes the earth revolves around the sun. The great man simply calls it, “ATTRACTION”. Another great man, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein, on the other hand, saw gravity as the property of space, a non-force  curvature of space,  called spacetime,  such curvature created by suspended large bodies in space and can be dragged.

Have you ever wondered  how the galaxies, stars, planets  came into being and solidified?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth, no repulsion? Before answering these questions, know by heart that there exists the unwritten law of opposite, with positive attribute and negative attribute that is inherent, built-in, in the emanation of the universe, that cannot be lost nor destroyed in billions centigrade nor billion of years, that  is operating up to now.  This universe was constructed with the unlike-bind attribute winning over the like-repulse attribute, otherwise, this visible universe would not have existed. Without such binding, call it attraction, there would have been no formation and solidification of matters in the universe. Observe: all galaxies, stars, planets all have north pole and south pole, plants, human beings, man, woman, atom, quarks, have, each, built- in positive - negative property that binds. Earth is entirely composed  of atoms which have, each, undeniable positive to negative binding property.  There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative. Proton, neutron, electron have positive and negative. At the heart of atom are proton and neutron, and in the heart of proton and neutron are  still smaller substance, called quarks which consist of UUP, DDU, top-bottom, implicating contrast: positive and negative.  It is most likely that gluon is part of quarks binding series of quarks positive and negative,  creating strong binding  force, takes enormous force to separate one quark from aligned quarks    Electron is all negative? Without dual electrical lines of positive and negative on which electrons is transmitted,  no complete positive-negative electro-magnetic light is possible .  That is why an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise. Neutrinos? has mass, has positive and negative. The construction of  earth  can be observed from the  behaviors of magnets which has inherent positive and negative attributes of the law of opposite as follows:
 

Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion! (with more clarity)

The behaviors of the inherent law of opposite as unraveled  inherent in bar magnet are many: A bar magnet is divided equally between positive side and negative side. Here is a revelation: Both positive side and negative side have unlike-bind behaviors and like-repulse behaviors.  Meaning, the unlike-bind behavior is not only on positive side (positive to negative binding), it is too on negative side (negative to positive binding) of bar magnet! And the like-repulse behavior  is not only on the negative side (negative to negative repulse) of bar magnet: it is on  positive  side ( positive to positive repulse)  of the bar magnet! Cut and cut into tiny pieces a bar magnet, and observe, each cut piece has equal positive and negative!! Meaning, positive and negative are not fixed, it is directional: swing/flips to one side and  becomes positive, swing/flips to opposite side and  becomes negative. Earth polarity FLIPS.  That positive and negative are flippable implicating that positive and negative are ambivalent, are one! No wonder an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise. Throw the  tiny cut pieces of magnet together in piece of curl paper, and the positive of one bar cut binds negative another bar cut etc. ; and of meeting of negative sides to negative sides, positive sides to positive sides  of magnet cuts, result in repulsion, but curl further paper inwardly,  until positive meets negative and there is binding. Enlightened with  these ambivalent behaviors of positive and negative attributes of the bar magnet, consistent with  the law of opposite, here is the deep revelation, unbelievably overlooked and taken for granted, but very, very significant revelation, here is the clue why gravity is all attraction, no repulsion: Hold a bar magnet which has overpowering positive and negative force and metal sheet which shows no positive and negative force. Contact  the positive side of bar  magnet  to  the metal sheet and the positive side of the magnet sucks, binds the metal.  Now contact the  negative side of the bar magnet to   the metal and the metal is sucked, too!!! Why? The overpowering positive attribute of the positive side of bar magnet causes the hidden weak negative attribute of the metal to flip, to surface and be sucked by the overpowering positive side of bar magnet !!. In like manner, the overpowering negative attribute in the negative side of bar magnet  causes the hidden weak  positive attribute of weaker metal to flip, to surface and  be sucked by the stronger negative attribute of bar magnet!! ( as stated that unlike binding is on both sides of bar magnet) Now,  the size of  earth (though  trillions times weaker than a magnet), from its interior to surface,  is enormous  larger compared to any object, animate, or inanimate, on surface of earth, thus, its unlike bind attribute is equally enormous. (Remember, this universe was constructed with the unlike-bind WINNING over the like repulse of the inherent law of the universe).. Here is what happen: in northern hemisphere,  the  overpowering  positive binding attribute of the northern hemisphere  causes the overpowered diminutive  negative attribute of all objects, animate or inanimate, including atmosphere and extended field at outer space, caused to FLIP (like earth polarity flips), to face and be sucked by said overpowering positive binding attribute of northern hemisphere, the direction of the sucking  toward the center of earth.  Correspondingly, in southern hemisphere, the overpowering southern hemisphere’s negative  attribute causes  the diminutive  positive attribute of all stated supra diminutive objects, atmosphere, etc. in said southern hemisphere, caused to FLIP. to face, and be sucked by  the overwhelming  negative of southern hemisphere, direction of all sucking toward center of earth.  .. That is the reason why gravity of earth  is all attraction toward earth, either on northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere!!! no REPULSION!!! And why weights of objects are the same either in northern and southern hemisphere? because earth, like bar magnet, automatically divides itself, to equal northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere.. Expanding,  a galaxy holds 100 billion stars and much more, has  mass by trillion times greater  than  the diminutive stars, thus, its gigantic ambivalent unlike-bind attribute,  call it gravity, is  simply too good, overwhelmingly causes  the equally ambivalent diminutive stars to flip/bind, abide with the unlike-bind attribute of the galaxy. Earth is rotating, orbiting, the whole earth becomes conductive, capacitive,  that everything on surface, including atmosphere, and extension gravity on outer space,  are being attracted downward toward center of earth,.. like  the conductive, capacitive of IPad that a weak electro-magnetic finger touch on screen of IPad  is sucked by the stronger electro-magnetic capacitive of  IPad.  The gravity of earth is a half percent greater in the poles than in the equator points the  indestructible but flexible, equal  dividing line between north pole  and south pole.  Gravity of earth is, itself, unearthly a trillion times weaker than a positive-negative concentrate magnet that can lift a nail  but in outer space, the entire gravity of earth, a whole lump sum, is galvanized, becomes a gargantuan unison force that lifts billion of tons of sea water on earth every time the moon is overhead…that the tide is raised on earth every time the moon is overhead is unquestionable evidence  that such raising is a created physical force that binds the moon to earth: call it  gravitational attraction. 


The unified field theory:

The unlike-bind attributes of the opposite law has many manifestations: as it manifests on surface of earth and outer space, it is called gravity, as it manifests in electricity, it is called electromagnetism, as it manifests on quarks, it is called strong force, weak electrical force. This is the unification of four fundamental forces of the universe.

 The relationship  of spacetime,  gravity, and light:

There are only three phenomena that occupy completely all of outer space: Spacetime,  gravity, and light. All have electro-magnetic property of the law of opposite. Spacetime is real. Centuries earlier, it was conceived that ether was luminiferous, but no luminiferous ether found. But a 186,000 miles length of electro-magnetic light  impressed per second on surface of earth becomes luminiferous . The Michelson-Morley experiment on interferometer, found that light is constant anywhere it is directed at 186,000 miles/sec, shows how spacetime is tense and frictionless. Spacetime  occupies all of outer space, without which, both electro-magnetic light and gravity would have no medium in which to travel at 186,000 miles per second.

Jose S. Aldea
October 11, 2014

Revised Philippine Copyright 2014
By: Jose S. Aldea

With Philippine Copyrights 2004, 2007-10
xxxxxxxx
« Last Edit: 22/11/2014 09:11:09 by bingbisnar19 »




  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

« Last Edit: 30/11/2014 04:28:43 by bingbisnar19 »

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
WHY GRAVITY OF EARTH IS ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD EARTH, NO REPULSION  (jsa 2014)

What was supposed to be one of the most simple questions in physics turns out to be the greatest unsolved  mystery in physics: what is gravity, why is gravity  all attraction, no repulsion?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth? According to Eminent Scientist, Isaac Newton, gravity is “attraction”. But the great man stopped there,  cannot or did not elaborate why an apple fell on his laps, why everything on earth falls back to earth but  he saw correctly that the  same force that makes an apple fall on his lap is the same force that makes the earth revolves around the sun. The great man simply calls it, “ATTRACTION”. Another great man, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein, on the other hand, saw gravity as the property of space, a non-force  curvature of space,  called spacetime,  such curvature created by suspended body in space, like the sun that  captures/entraps  smaller objects, like the planets,  and caused to orbit the sun, the giant sun being 98% up of total composition of the solar system and all the planets being 2% or less. Who is right?

Have you ever wondered  how the galaxies, stars, planets  came into being and solidified?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth, no repulsion? Before answering these questions, know by heart that there exists the unwritten law of opposite, with positive attribute and negative attribute that is inherent, built-in, in the emanation of the universe, that cannot be lost nor destroyed in billions centigrade nor billion of years, that  is operating up to now.  This universe was constructed with the unlike-bind attribute winning over the like-repulse attribute, otherwise, this visible universe would not have existed. Without such binding, call it attraction, there would have been no formation and solidification of matters in the universe. Observe: all galaxies, stars, planets all have north pole and south pole, plants, human beings, man, woman, atom, quarks, have, each, built- in positive - negative property that binds. Earth is entirely composed  of atoms which have, each, undeniable positive to negative binding property.  There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative. Proton, neutron, electron have positive and negative. At the heart of atom are proton and neutron, and in the heart of proton and neutron are  still smaller substance, called quarks which consist of UUP, DDU, top-bottom, implicating contrast: positive and negative.  It is most likely that gluon is part of quarks binding series of quarks positive and negative,  creating strong binding  force, takes enormous force to separate one quark from aligned quarks    Electron is all negative? Without dual electrical lines of positive and negative on which electrons is transmitted,  no complete positive-negative electro-magnetic light is possible .  That is why an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise. The construction of  earth  can be observed from the  behaviors of magnets which has inherent positive and negative attributes of the law of opposite as follows:
 
 
 Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion!.

The behaviors of the inherent law of opposite as unraveled  inherent in bar magnet are many: A bar magnet is divided equally between positive side and negative side. Both sides have unlike-bind behaviors, positive to negative, and negative to positive, and both sides have like-repulse behaviors, re- positive to positive, negative to negative.  Thus, the unlike-bind behavior is not only on positive side, it is too on negative side! And the like-repulse behavior  is not only on the negative side: it is on both positive side and negative side of the bar! Cut and cut into tiny pieces a bar magnet, and observe, each cut piece has equal positive and negative!! Meaning, positive and negative are not permanent, it is directional, swing to one side, it becomes positive, swing to opposite side, it becomes negative, thus, positive and negative  is interchangeable, ambivalent, implicating that positive and negative are one! No wonder an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise.  Throw the  tiny cut pieces of magnet together in piece of curl paper, and the positive side of cut-pieces binds negative side; and of side of cut-pieces,  negative to negative, positive to positive, repulse, curl further paper inwardly, and the cur-pieces  repulse recoil  until positive meets negative and binds . Here is the deep revelation, unbelievable overlooked and taken for granted, but very, very significant revelation, here is the clue why gravity is all attraction, no repulsion: Have a bar magnet and metal sheet. Point the positive side of bar magnet to contact the metal sheet and it binds, now point the negative side of the magnet to contact  the metal sheet and it binds, too!!! So both sides bind the metal sheet. Why? The inherent ambivalent unlike-bind attribute on both sides of the magnet must be  overwhelmingly much stronger than the equally ambivalent unlike-bind attribute of the metal sheet.  Now,  the size of  earth, from its interior to surface,  is enormous, by trillion times larger compared to any object, animate, or inanimate, on surface of earth, that earth’s ambivalent  unlike-bind attribute  is enormously supra- stronger  than the diminutive unlike-bind attribute of supra, supra   diminutive objects on surface of earth, thus, all objects, animate and inanimate, in surface of earth, including all atmosphere are overwhelmingly attracted and sucked by earth’s attraction gravity toward the center of earth. That is the reason why gravity of earth is all attraction toward the center of earth, no repulsion.  Further, a galaxy holds 100 billion stars and much more, implicates  the mass of a galaxy must be several trillion  times greater  than each of the diminutive stars, thus, the ambivalent gravitational pull of the galaxy simply overwhelmingly, overwhelmingly  sucks the equally ambivalent positive and negative attribute of each star. The principle is laid down, re- Point either the positive side or negative side  of bar magnet to metal sheet and each binds. Remember, this universe was constructed with the unlike-bind WINNING over the like-repulse of the law of opposite. Such  gravity of earth  a half percent greater in the poles than in the equator creates  the  indestructible but flexible  dividing line between north and south poles.  Gravity of earth is, itself, unearthly a trillion times weaker than a positive-negative concentrate magnet that can lift a nail  but in outer space, the entire gravity of earth, a whole lump sum, is galvanized, becomes a gargantuan unison force that lifts billion of tons of sea water on earth every time the moon is overhead.



The unified field theory:

The unlike-bind attributes of the opposite law has many manifestations: as it manifests on surface of earth and outer space, it is called gravity, as it manifests in electricity, it is called electromagnetism, as it manifests on quarks, it is called strong force, weak electrical force. This is the unification of field theory.

 The relationship  of spacetime,  gravity, and light:

There are only three phenomena that occupy completely all of outer space: Spacetime,  gravity, and light. Both gravity and light are electro-magnetic. Spacetime too is electro-magnetic with positive and negative attributes weaker than gravity, positive and negative into one. Spacetime is real. Centuries earlier, it was conceived that ether was luminiferous, but no luminiferous ether found. But a186,000 miles length of electro-magnetic light  impressed per second on surface of earth becomes luminiferous. Spacetime is pitched black in outer space, shows just how super-thin. The Michelson-Morley experiment on interferometer, found that light is constant anywhere it is directed, proves how spacetime is tense and even.  Spacetime is the skein of outer space, all of outer space, and unbreakably intersects all interior of atoms which is 99.999999999999% vacuum but not  perfect vacant. Spacetime, most possibly, is stationary occupying all of outer space, without which, both electro-magnetic light and gravity would have no medium on which to travel at 186,000 miles per second.

Jose S. Aldea
October 11, 2014

Revised Philippine Copyright 2014
By: Jose S. Aldea

With Philippine Copyrights 2004, 2007-10
xxxxxxxx
 



« Last Edit: 11/11/2014 09:44:27 by bingbisnar19 »

*

Offline gazza711

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 144
    • View Profile
I hop ei didn't miss something in your theories.I want to build the hoverboard with electrostatic forces and cardboard as a low conductor to avoid shocks.
This in conjunction with what you believe is similar.
Gravity does not exist..it is the exactly the same principle as the helium balloon floating to ur ceiling and bouncing off-buoyancy is what this force is.everything that we call gravity pushing us down and not pulling us down.in outer space,everything is what it is due to like elements attracting and repeling one another.if gravity still cant be answered,I believe my theory is 100% correct!!!

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Hi! Please read again and digest. jsaldea

*

Offline gazza711

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 144
    • View Profile
Oh yeah.Well gravity cant exist in a vacuum?answer that holmes.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Spacetime completely exist in vacuum, has inherent attributes of positive and negative into one, the medium of gravity. jsaldea 11.9.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
How about galaxies that hold  100 billion stars and up.. Galaxies have such enormous attraction gravity proportionately compared to supra-tiny stars that the stars' attraction gravity,individually, is overpowered by the galaxy gargantuan attraction gravity. Remember, this universe is constructed with the unlike-bind WINNING over the like-repulse. jsaldea 11.12.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
What was supposed to be one of the most simple questions in physics turns out to be the greatest unsolved  mystery in physics: what is gravity, why is gravity  all attraction, no repulsion?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth? According to Eminent Scientist, Isaac Newton, gravity is “attraction”. But the great man stopped there,  cannot or did not elaborate why an apple fell on his laps, why everything on earth falls back to earth but  he saw correctly that the  same force that makes an apple fall on his lap is the same force that makes the earth revolves around the sun. The great man simply calls it, “ATTRACTION”. Another great man, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein, on the other hand, saw gravity as the property of space, a non-force  curvature of space,  called spacetime,  such curvature created by suspended large bodies in space and can be dragged.

Have you ever wondered  how the galaxies, stars, planets  came into being and solidified?  Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth, no repulsion? Before answering these questions, know by heart that there exists the unwritten law of opposite, with positive attribute and negative attribute that is inherent, built-in, in the emanation of the universe, that cannot be lost nor destroyed in billions centigrade nor billion of years, that  is operating up to now.  This universe was constructed with the unlike-bind attribute winning over the like-repulse attribute, otherwise, this visible universe would not have existed. Without such binding, call it attraction, there would have been no formation and solidification of matters in the universe. Observe: all galaxies, stars, planets all have north pole and south pole, plants, human beings, man, woman, atom, quarks, have, each, built- in positive - negative property that binds. Earth is entirely composed  of atoms which have, each, undeniable positive to negative binding property.  There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative. Proton, neutron, electron have positive and negative. At the heart of atom are proton and neutron, and in the heart of proton and neutron are  still smaller substance, called quarks which consist of UUP, DDU, top-bottom, implicating contrast: positive and negative.  It is most likely that gluon is part of quarks binding series of quarks positive and negative,  creating strong binding  force, takes enormous force to separate one quark from aligned quarks    Electron is all negative? Without dual electrical lines of positive and negative on which electrons is transmitted,  no complete positive-negative electro-magnetic light is possible .  That is why an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise. Neutrinos? has mass, has positive and negative.  Dark energy and dark matter could have been the predecessor of the constructed unlike-bind universe.  The construction of  earth  can be observed from the  behaviors of magnets which has inherent positive and negative attributes of the law of opposite as follows:
 

Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion! (with more clarity)

The behaviors of the inherent law of opposite as unraveled  inherent in bar magnet are many: A bar magnet is divided equally between positive side and negative side. Here is a revelation: Both positive side and negative side have unlike-bind behaviors and like-repulse behaviors.  Meaning, the unlike-bind behavior is not only on positive side (positive to negative binding), it is too on negative side (negative to positive binding) of bar magnet! And the like-repulse behavior  is not only on the negative side (negative to negative repulse) of bar magnet: it is on  positive  side ( positive to positive repulse)  of the bar magnet! Cut and cut into tiny pieces a bar magnet, and observe, each cut piece has equal positive and negative!! Meaning, positive and negative are not fixed, it is directional: swing/flips to one side and  becomes positive, swing/flips to opposite side and  becomes negative. Uncannily the  flip is similar to the flip of the polarity of earth .  That positive and negative can be flipped implicates that positive and negative are ambivalent, are one! No wonder an electric motor can be made to rotate clockwise and counter-clockwise. Throw the  tiny cut pieces of magnet together in piece of curl paper, and the positive of one  cut bar binds negative another bar cut etc., and  of one cut bar  negative side to  negative side of another cut bar, there is repulsion, but curl further paper inwardly,  until positive meets negative and there is binding. Enlightened with the knowledge of  these ambivalent behaviors of positive and negative attributes of the bar magnet, in FULL compliance with  the inherent  law of opposite, here is the deeper revelation, unbelievably overlooked and taken for granted, but very, very significant revelation, in  here is the clue why gravity is all attraction, no repulsion:  Perform this experiment with a bar magnet which has overpowering positive and negative property and a metal sheet which has no visible positive and negative property. Hold  the positive side of bar  magnet  to  contact the metal sheet and the positive side of the magnet sucks, binds the metal.  Now hold the bar magnet to contact its  negative side  to  the metal and the metal is sucked, too!!! Why? The overpowering positive attribute of the positive side of bar magnet causes the unseen weak negative attribute of the metal to FLIP, to face and be sucked by the overpowering positive side of bar magnet !!. In like manner, the overpowering negative attribute in the negative side of bar magnet  causes the  unseen weak  positive attribute of weaker metal to FLIP, to face and  be sucked by the stronger negative attribute of bar magnet!! (NOTE THAT THAT SUCH FLIP IS THE SAME AS THE FLIP OF EARTH’S POLARITY . FURTHER, NOTE THAT AS OBSERVED, UNLIKE-BIND ATTRIBUTE IS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BAR MAGNET.). Why does the positive side or negative side of the bar  binds the same metal sheet? Evidently, the positive side of bar magnet binds the flipped negative attribute of  the metal sheet, NOT the positive attribute of metal sheet binds the positive attribute of the metal, otherwise, there is repulsion!!. In like manner, the negative side of bar magnet binds the flipped positive attribute of metal sheet, NOT negative to negative contact which is repulsion. What causes the flip? If the bar magnet is elongated, there is strong force at both ends, while closer at the middle, the unlike-bind attribute  becomes weaker, such, is the substance of metal sheet, closer to the middle, or of shorter length, can easily flip.. Now,  the size of  earth (itself, trillions times weaker than a magnet), from its interior to surface,  is enormously  larger compared to all short length unlike-bind attribute of all object, animate, or inanimate, on surface of earth, thus, its accumulated  unlike bind attribute of earth is equally enormous. (Remember, this universe was constructed with the unlike-bind WINNING over the like repulse of the inherent law of the universe).. Here is what happen: in northern hemisphere,  the  overpowering  positive binding attribute of the northern hemisphere  causes the overpowered diminutive  short-length negative attribute of all objects, animate or inanimate on surface of earth, including atmosphere and extended field at outer space, caused to FLIP to negative, to face and bind  to said overpowering positive binding attribute of northern hemisphere, the direction of the sucking  toward the center of earth.  Correspondingly, in southern hemisphere, the overpowering southern hemisphere’s negative  attribute causes  the  weak positive attribute of all stated supra diminutive objects, atmosphere, etc. in said southern hemisphere,  to FLIP. to face, and be sucked by  the overwhelming  negative of southern hemisphere, direction of all sucking toward center of earth.  .. TTHAT IS THE REASON WHY GRAVITY OF EARTH IS ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD EARTH, NO REPULSION !!! on either on ALL northern hemisphere and All southern hemisphere!!! The  principle is laid down: the overpowering ambivalent positive/negative attribute  of  suspended large bodies in outer space will cause  the overpowered ambivalent weak positive/negative attribute of  smaller bodies in outer space to FLIP and bind, unlike-bind operating, to the overpowering attribute of said suspended larger bodies. An example in space: earth  has unlike-bind attribute six times greater than that of the captured orbiting moon.  Why weights of objects are the same either in northern and southern hemisphere? because earth, like bar magnet, automatically divides itself, to equal northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere.. Expanding,  a galaxy holds 100 billion stars and much more, has  mass by trillion times greater  than  the diminutive stars, thus, its gigantic ambivalent unlike-bind attribute,  call it gravity, is  simply too good, overwhelmingly causes  the equally ambivalent diminutive stars to FLIP and bind, abide with the unlike-bind attribute of the galaxy. Earth is rotating, orbiting, the whole earth becomes conductive, capacitive,  that everything on surface, including atmosphere, and extension gravity on outer space,  are being attracted downward toward center of earth,.. like  the conductive, capacitive of IPad that a weak electro-magnetic finger touch on screen of IPad  is sucked by the operative unlike-bind property by the stronger electro-magnetic capacitive of  IPad.  The gravity of earth is a half percent greater in the poles than in the equator points the  indestructible but flexible, equal  dividing line between north pole  and south pole.  Gravity of earth is, itself, unearthly a trillion times weaker than a positive-negative concentrate magnet that can lift a nail  but in outer space, the entire gravity of earth, a whole lump sum, is galvanized, becomes a gargantuan unison force that lifts billion of tons of sea water on earth every time the moon is overhead…that the tide is raised on earth every time the moon is overhead is unquestionable evidence  that such raising is a created physical force that binds the moon to earth: call it  gravitational attraction. 


The unified field theory:

The unlike-bind attributes of the opposite law has many manifestations: as it manifests on surface of earth and outer space, it is called gravity, as it manifests in electricity, it is called electromagnetism, as it manifests on quarks, it is called strong force, weak electrical force. This is the unification of four fundamental forces of the universe.

 The relationship  of spacetime,  gravity, and light:

There are only three phenomena that occupy completely all of outer space: Spacetime,  gravity, and light. All have electro-magnetic property of the law of opposite. Spacetime is real. Centuries earlier, it was conceived that ether was luminiferous, but no luminiferous ether found. But a 186,000 miles length of electro-magnetic light  impressed per second on surface of earth becomes luminiferous . The Michelson-Morley experiment on interferometer, found that light is constant anywhere it is directed at 186,000 miles/sec, shows how spacetime is tense and frictionless. Spacetime is, itself, with positive and negative attribute as one, is the stationary skein that  occupies all of outer space, without which medium, both electro-magnetic light and gravity would have no medium in which to travel at 186,000 miles per second, without which medium, there would have no radio, TV,  IPAD,  internet whose foundation is  complete positive and negative, all intersecting spacetime possesses.


Jose S. Aldea
October 11, 2014

Revised Philippine Copyright 2014
By: Jose S. Aldea

With Philippine Copyrights 2004, 2007-10
xxxxxxxx
« Last Edit: 01/12/2014 08:39:30 by bingbisnar19 »

*

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4058
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
You do realize of course that the magnetic field circulates and does not follow the inverse square law. Gravity does not follow the flux of the magnetic field.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Both gravity and magnetism have positive and negative attribute of the law of opposite. The deeper explanation to your query can be explained in the ambivalent behaviors, please read again corrected section: "Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion".

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
In macro level in outer space, attraction gravity in outer space has created physical force (similar to flux of rotating magnetism) as it locks the moon to orbit earth. If there is a way to look into the micro as in the rotating magnetism, it follows the inverse law.

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
What was supposed to be one of the most simple questions in physics turns out to be the greatest unsolved  mystery in physics: what is gravity, why is gravity  all attraction, no repulsion?
While the aim of science is to seek out why things happen the way they do we often only get answers to how they do it. In Newton's and Einstein's theory of gravity all we got was how gravity works, not why. Sir Arthur Eddington stated this in his text: Gravitation and the Principle of Relativity by A.S. Eddington, Nature, March 14, 1918, page 36

Quote from: bingbisnar19
The purpose of Einstein’s new theory has often been misunderstood, and it has been criticized as an attempt to explain gravitation. The theory does not offer any explanation of gravitation; that lies outside its scope, and it does not even hint at a possible mechanism. It is true that we have introduced a definite hypothesis as to the relation between gravitation and a distortion of space; but if that explains anything, it explains not gravitation, but space, i.e. the scaffolding constructed for our measures. -

Quote from: bingbisnar19
Why is gravity of earth all attraction toward earth? According to Eminent Scientist, Isaac Newton, gravity is “attraction”. But the great man stopped there,  cannot or did not elaborate why an apple fell on his laps, ..
Newton certainly didn't refrain from saying why apples fall. They fall because there is a gravitational force acting on them towards the center of the earth.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
why everything on earth falls back to earth but  he saw correctly that the  same force that makes an apple fall on his lap is the same force that makes the earth revolves around the sun. The great man simply calls it, “ATTRACTION”.
It happens because of the force between two particles (a body being considered a collection of particles). That force between two particles of mass M and m is expressed as

F = GMm/r2

Quote from: bingbisnar19
Another great man, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein, on the other hand, saw gravity as the property of space, a non-force  curvature of space,  called spacetime,  such curvature created by suspended large bodies in space and can be dragged.
That's a misconception. Einstein never said that. Einstein said that gravity is locally equivalent to an accelerating frame of reference. Only when there are tidal forces present is the spacetime curved. But the tidal forces are not what causes the force. In fact you can have a field of gravitational force even in a flat spacetime. E.g. a uniform gravitational field has zero spacetime curvature. See:
http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/gr/uniform_force.htm

Quote from: bingbisnar19
There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative.
That's quite untrue in general. It's only true for magnetic monopoles, not electric monopoles.


Quote from: bingbisnar19
Why gravity of earth is all attraction toward earth, no repulsion!.
All I see you doing is asking the question and that's all. You've not forward one iota of any theory or proof as to why it does so.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
The behaviors of the inherent law of opposite as unraveled  inherent in bar magnet are many: A bar magnet is divided equally between positive side and negative side.
There's no such thing with magnets. There is only North and South poles. There's no such thing as positive and negative magnetic poles.

I can't make out the rest. You're not being clear at all. You're just yammering on about magnetic pieces and not being clear about it at all. Gravitational fields CANNOT be described in terms of magnetism.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
about the inverse law query: maybe, this will do: have two neodymium  magnet, one magnet is 5 times the size of the other magnet. Put the two magnet in paper boat, and place in water in distance they attracts each other. In between, the inverse law can be arrived.

Please read again and digest the third paragraph. All that is needed to know about the inherent unwritten law of opposite and magnet bar which has positive and negative are very described with clarity, REITERATING, THE CLUE TO WHY WHY THE MAGNET BAR POINTED TO A METAL SHEET WILL BIND, BOTH SIDES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, OF THE BAR BIND!!WHY? The explanation is clear in there. PLEASE READ UNTIL YOU ARRIVE AT NORTHERN HEMISPHERE AND SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE. jsaldea 11.14.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
About the response about the monopole? Can electricity be produced without positive and negative. But electricity in generator can be rotated clockwise and counterclockwise, meaning directional to counterclockwise and clockwise but either way,, requires complete positive and negative, to produce electricity.. jsaldea

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
About the response about the monopole? Can electricity be produced without positive and negative. But electricity in generator can be rotated clockwise and counterclockwise, meaning directional to counterclockwise and clockwise but either way,, requires complete positive and negative, to produce electricity.. jsaldea

Let's be very clear about this. You wrote
Quote from: bingbisnar19
There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative.
There are two kinds of monopoles; electric monopoles and magnetic monopoles. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_Monopole
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole

An electric monopole is simply a charged particle. A magnetic monopole has never been detected.

When you wrote: "There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative." the positive/negative has no meaning when applied to magnetism.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
Can electricity be produced without positive and negative.
Electric currents and EM fields cannot be produced with no electric charges.

Do you understand that positive and negative does NOT apply to magnets now? I stressed that in my last post but you don't seem to have understood it. That worries me.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
It is against the law of the construction of the universe if there is monopole: all positive, all negative. As shown, cut and cut a bar magnet into small pieces and EACH CUT piece has positive and negative!! In the middle of bar magnet is positive and negative in one, but it is not monopole.

Reiterating, the clue why gravity is all attraction, no repulsion, is as follows:: Hold a bar magnet and point the positive side of the bar to metal, IT BINDS, now, point the negative side of the bar and it BINDS. WHY?

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
It is against the law of the construction of the universe if there is monopole: all positive, all negative. As shown, cut and cut a bar magnet into small pieces and EACH CUT piece has positive and negative!! In the middle of bar magnet is positive and negative in one, but it is not monopole.
Since you refuse to pay attention and listen to what I'm telling you I won't contribute again. You simply refuse to grasp the fact that there's no such thing as negative and positive when it comes to magnetism. You KEEP confusing the concepts of negative and positive from electric charges to North and South poles in magnetism. And until you learn the difference I won't make another attempt to help you. Not listening to what I'm saying is rather rude in my opinion. I've explained this multiple times and in each case you've ignored it. You'll never learn until you learn to pay attention to what people are explaining to you.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
There is no such thing as positive and negative in magnetism? Have a bar magnet,..it has empirical  positive and negative divided equally.

Here is clarifying completing clue: POINT THE POSITIVE SIDE OF BAR MAGNET TO METAL SHEET, IT BINDS; POINT THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF THE BAR MAGNET, IT BINDS, NO REPULSION!!! EARTH'S GRAVITY BINDS NO REPULSION!!!. Either in north hemisphere and southern hemisphere. jsaldea 11.14.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
There is no such thing as positive and negative in magnetism?
I hate being rude but this is getting to be very frustrating. For example, it's now that your asking me about it instead of asking me about it when I first posted it. I could have corrected your confusion a long time ago had you asked when you first saw it. Yet you said nothing. I can promise you that everything that I'm telling you is absolutely true as physicists understand electrodynamics today.

Haven't you ever studied electrodynamics at the college level (i.e. a calculus based course?). If not then see
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics by Randall D. Knight. You can download it from here:
http://bookzz.org/book/509611/8e3f7e

So no. There is no such thing as positive and negative magnetism. There's only a North and South poles on magnets. See the diagrams at: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/elemag.html

Under the Wiki section on magnets at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet
you won't find anything about positive and negative there. And you won't find it in any text on EM either.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
Have a bar magnet,..it has empirical  positive and negative divided equally.
At this point there is no excuse for this misunderstanding. In several previous posts I clearly explained that to you. E.g. I wrote in previous posts
Quote
That's quite untrue in general. It's only true for magnetic monopoles, not electric monopoles.
...
There's no such thing with magnets. There is only North and South poles. There's no such thing as positive and negative magnetic poles.
...
When you wrote: "There is no such thing as monopole: all positive, all negative." the positive/negative has no meaning when applied to magnetism.
...
Do you understand that positive and negative does NOT apply to magnets now? I stressed that in my last post but you don't seem to have understood it. That worries me.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
Here is clarifying completing clue: POINT THE POSITIVE SIDE OF BAR MAGNET...
Again, a bar magnet DOES NOT HAVE a positive side. It ONLY has a North pole and a South pole. Got it yet?

Quote from: bingbisnar19
TO METAL SHEET, IT BINDS; POINT THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF THE BAR MAGNET, IT BINDS, NO REPULSION!!!
So what? Without the bar magnet near a metal sheet there is no magnetic field near the sheet. It only appears when a magnet is placed near it. A sheet of certain kinds of metals, such as steel (what you said won't work with some metals such as copper or nickel - that's why you can't pick up metal coins with a magnet). Steel is what's called a ferromagnetic material. When you place a magnet near it the magnets field induces the magnetic domains to align parallel to the magnets field and add up to produce a strong field which is then attracted to the magnet. Without the magnet there it won't attract anything. And it only works with ferromagnetic metals.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
EARTH'S GRAVITY BINDS NO REPULSION!!!
So what? Just because they have one thing in common it doesn't mean anything. One property of matter in the gravitational field of the earth is that all objects accelerate at the same rate. That's not true of magnetic material in a magnetic field. The acceleration of tiny magnets in a magnetic field is that their acceleration will depend on their mass. Quite unlike gravity.

So again, nothing you've said here has any meaningful. All you did is point out something that every physicist in the world knows, i.e. that a bar magnet will exert a force on ferrous materials and that the gravitational field exerts an attractive force on all bodies. That's as far as the relationship goes. Without the magnet near the metal there will be no magnetic field in the metal. However when you take a body out of a gravitational field its field will still be there. All tiny magnets accelerate in a magnetic field as a function of their mass, unlike bodies in a gravitational field in which all bodies accelerate independent of their mass.

Sorry, but those are the facts.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
 North pole and south pole of magnet?.. are names only. How do we know it is north pole and south pole of magnet? , (a) when two north poles of two magnets are made to contact one another: both repulse (negative), (b)when north pole and south pole are made to contact one another, both bind (positive). jsaldea 11.15.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
North pole and south p;ole of bar magnet?...are names only. How do we know it is north pole and south pole. have two magnet bars, now contact north pole of  the magnet bar to north pole of the other magnet bar. Both repulse (negative). Now contact the north pole of bar magnet to south pole of the other magnet bar, bind (positive). jsaldea 11.14.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
North pole and south pole of magnet?.. are names only.
It is totally improper in physics to use a term in a way that it is not defined. Once people change words to the way they like it people start to loose the ability to communicate properly.

Therefore please use physics terms as they are defined and not as you wish they were defined.

There's a very good reason not to refer to them as positive and negative. Read that text I showed you and you'll learn why. I'm certainly not about to type out an entire textbook in this thread. I wrote a very short summary under my personal page at:
http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/em/laws_of_electrodynamics.htm

Quote from: bingbisnar19
How do we know it is north pole and south pole of magnet?
By definition. Why do you think I gave you a link to that text, for my health? It's so you can properly learn about magnetism instead of having to have each of your claims corrected.

By definition the North magnetic pole of a bar magnet is defined such that the north magnetic pole of the needle in a compass  will point to the North geometric pole of the earth. The South magnetic pole points to the South geometric pole.

If you think about it you'll learn that the North geometric pole is a south magnetic pole and a south geometric pole is a north magnetic pole.

Quote from: bingbisnar19
  , (a) when two north poles of two magnets are made to contact one another: both repulse (negative), (b)when north pole and south pole are made to contact one another, both bind (positive). jsaldea 11.15.14
Tell me something I don't know. :)

Please make sure that you understand that I'm not trying to be a jerk or an a-hole or anything like that. I'm typically a nice guy but I'm very frustrated. Okay? :)
« Last Edit: 14/11/2014 16:15:35 by PmbPhy »

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Tell me something O dont know? I am tellig something you dont know. Try to read between the lines!!! jsaldea 11.14.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
That preceding answer was ok. jsaldea

*

Offline evan_au

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 4246
    • View Profile
Quote from: PmbPhy
By definition the North magnetic pole of a bar magnet is defined such that the north magnetic pole of the needle in a compass  will point to the North geometric pole of the earth.

Some geologists think that the Earth's magnetic field may be in the process of reversing.
If so, the definition may need to be enhanced to refer to the North Pole of the Earth as it was in the year 1900.

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
I am tellig something you dont know.
This is just plain silly. When I said tell me something I don't know I was referring to your comment
Quote
(a) when two north poles of two magnets are made to contact one another: both repulse (negative), (b)when north pole and south pole are made to contact one another, both bind (positive).
which is something every single physicist on earth knows like the back of his hand. It's like trying to tell a mathematician (which I am as well) that 1 + 1 = 2.

But no, you're not telling me anything I don't know. Not at all as a matter of fact. I don't wish to come off as arrogant. I'm going to say this to make something clear for the purpose of this discussion. I've been a professional physicist for two and a half decades now. I've studied electrodynamics at every level that there is from basic Physics course in college, to an undergraduate course in college and as a full course in graduate school. I aced all of these courses as a matter of fact.

That's how I know that everything that I said is correct and that all the corrections I made to your posts and comments are exactly what I said was wrong with them. And merely claiming that you told me something I don't know and saying that I have to read between the lines is the same thing as saying nothing.

re - That preceding answer was ok. - I have no idea what answer you're referring to.

At this time I see that its not worth continuing. I don't see any willingness on your part to pick up a text on electrodynamics and learn it the correct way or read my website and educate yourself that way, .... unless I'm wrong.

Are you willing to learn?

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: evan_au
Some geologists think that the Earth's magnetic field may be in the process of reversing.
If so, the definition may need to be enhanced to refer to the North Pole of the Earth as it was in the year 1900.
Not at all. That's how it was originally defined. Now we use the direction defined using current in a wire. The current creates a magnetic field which forms circles around the wire. We then take tiny compasses and place them around the wire and that's how we define the magnetic field, i.e. by the direction that the compass needle points (of course one has to be careful since the field is three-dimensional. Please see Figure  13 at  http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/em/laws_of_electrodynamics.htm

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: gazza711
Oh yeah.Well gravity cant exist in a vacuum?answer that holmes.
Where on earth did you ever get such an erroneous idea like that? Gravity most certainly does work in a vacuum. How do you think that all of the planets, asteroids and comets orbit the sun if the gravity can't exist in a vacuum? This was clear to Newton and was part of his thinking process. Nobody has ever asserted, demonstrated or proved otherwise.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Earth is rotating, orbiting, the whole earth becomes conductive, capacitive,  that everything on surface, including atmosphere, and extension gravity on outer space,  are being attracted downward toward center of earth,.. like  the conductive, capacitive of IPad that a light finger touch on screen of IPad  binds with the capacitive of  IPad.  . 
jsaldea 11.15.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
Earth is rotating, orbiting, the whole earth becomes conductive, capacitive,  that everything on surface, including atmosphere, and extension gravity on outer space,  are being attracted downward toward center of earth,.. like  the conductive, capacitive of IPad that a light finger touch on screen of IPad  binds with the capacitive of  IPad.  . 
jsaldea 11.15.14
Why would you think that anybody would be interested in your comments. No physicists worth their salt would pay attention to such a word salad unless there was some sort of derivation to establish that what you're claim, is in fact, true. So why would we be any different?

*

Offline gazza711

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 144
    • View Profile
ye.a couple of drinks wrote that statement.dont what I was thinking.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Why would anybody be interested? No comment jsaldea 11.15.16

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Anout the reversal of polarity of earth...shows the behavior of positive and negative, can flip, shows that positive and negative property of the opposite law are one, can swing to one direction, it becomes positive, can swing to the opposite side, it becomes negative but there is always the mandatory dividing middle, dividing north pole and south pole equally. The sun flips almost monthly? as such, nothing happens to earth. In like manner, if and when the polarity of earth flip, nothing serious can happen. jsaldea12 11.15.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
Why would anybody be interested?
That's correct. You think you've written and/or came up with a scientific theory for gravitational attraction but you haven't. What you've done so far is very far from working in within the bounds of the scientific method. Anybody can come in here and make any kind of claim that they want to and then expect everyone else to decipher what they've written and find out for themselves why what they've said to be correct. Well sir. That's just not how science works and time and time again I've been PLEADING with you to download that text I referred to and start reading exactly how physics and physicists work. And you've constantly and very very silently refused to do so and not explain to us why you should be different than every one else that came before you and did it correctly. I ask and I ask and what do you do
? Nothing. That's what you do. You won't answer my questions as to why you refuse to download that text and read it and start to do things the right way rather than the wrong way. And you don't see just how rude that is. And then you act all high and mighty when I ask you "Why would anybody be interested?" by responding with "No comment "  Do you really and truly not understand exactly what an arrogant and ignorant person that you're being "of your own choice" by the way.

To further illustrate what I mean I'm going to once again make an attempt top assist you and then when once again you refuse to take my advice and do it the right way I'll explain what you did wrong.

First we start out by telling you exactly what physics is. First we have to tell you what science is. To do this I'll give you a chapter 1 from a textbook I have called Classical Charged Particles written by a great physicist named Fritz Rohrlich. Chapter 1 is called Philosophy and Logic of Physical Theory It's from his text which is in a PDF file which I've uploaded to my website. It's at

http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ref/philosophy_physics.pdf

If you actually read that then read the article What is Science? which was a statement that was originally drafted by the Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) of the American Physical Society, in an attempt to meet the perceived need for a very short statement that would differentiate science from pseudoscience. Am. J. Phys. 67 (8), August 1999. The article is also online at

http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ref/what_is_science.pdf

From your actions so far I can predict that you won't do anything I've suggested and from that you'll have demonstrated my point that you're just too arrogant to want to learn.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
"That's correct you think you have written come up with scientific theory for gravitational attraction but you have not".

...Please read and digest  again ALL. jsaldea 11.16.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
"That's correct.. You think you've written and/or came up with a scientific theory for gravitational attraction but you haven't."...

THEN TELL ME WHY IS GRAVITY OF EARTH ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD THE CENTER OF EARTH, NO REPULSION? Please answer. jsaldea 11.16.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
That's correct. You think you've written and/or came up with a scientific theory for gravitational attraction but you haven't"

Reiterating,THEN WHY GRAVITY OF EARTH IS ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD THE CENTER OF EARTH,NO REPULSION? Please answer. jsaldea 11.17.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Quoted: "That's correct. You think you've written and/or came up with a scientific theory for gravitational attraction but you haven't."

Then sir, please tell me AHY GRAVITY IS ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD CENTER OF EARTH, NO REPULSION?
josaldea 11.17.14

Please print this.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Quoted "From your actions so far I can predict that you won't do anything I've suggested"

No comment to you,,,just read until you digest the revelation in this article: "Why gravity of earth is all attractioon toward earth, no repulsion" jsaldea 11.17.14

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
No comment jsaldea11.18.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
THEN TELL ME WHY IS GRAVITY OF EARTH ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD THE CENTER OF EARTH, NO REPULSION? Please answer. jsaldea 11.16.14
It's called a Law of Nature, i.e. something that is observed to be true but which can't be explained further or the mechanism is as of yet unknown. When you thought you could answer that question by using electrodynamics (EM) all you did was to shift the problem to EM because the electric field does the same thing, i.e. we don't know why like charges repel and unlike charges attract.

Consider also the following.
Quote
The purpose of Einstein’s new theory has often been misunderstood, and it has been criticized as an attempt to explain gravitation. The theory does not offer any explanation of gravitation; that lies outside its scope, and it does not even hint at a possible mechanism. It is true that we have introduced a definite hypothesis as to the relation between gravitation and a distortion of space; but if that explains anything, it explains not gravitation, but space, i.e. the scaffolding constructed for our measures. - Gravitation and the Principle of Relativity by A.S. Eddington, Nature, March 14, 1918, page 36


Had you actually have read:
http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ref/philosophy_physics.pdf
http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ref/what_is_science.pdf

like I told you to then you'd know why all the bogus responses you posted in the last several posts of yours are all wrong.

Let's face it. You're far to ignorant about how physics works, you've  been unable to fathom what I've explained so far about why it can't be an electric effect, i.e. because the rate of fall would depend on the charge of the body, the magnetic moment of the body and it's mass. Since all bodies which have no charge and/or is unmagnetized fall at the same rate of 9.8 m/s2  your so-called "theory" is totally wrong. Also the force on such bodies for a magnet bar magnet will not vary as 1/r2 but is observed to vary as 1/r3. There are just far too many things to your theory to explain in a thread. I'm not here to teach you physics since that's something you have to do on your own. We only  help people who are stuck with a problem or concept. You simply don't want to learn it.

It's clear to me now that you simply are unable and unwilling to learn physics I refuse to respond to anymore of your posts/comments. You just don't have what it takes and your too arrogant to go out and learn about them by picking up a college level physics text such as the one I showed you by Randal Knight and read it.

Goodbye, forever!
« Last Edit: 18/11/2014 10:44:31 by PmbPhy »

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
ye.a couple of drinks wrote that statement.dont what I was thinking.
Understood.

Please take some advice and ignore this thread altogether. It's rubbish. The OP refuses to listen to advice and ignores all the problems that I've explained that are wrong with it. He's also ignored every single reference to material I suggested to read so that he'd understand how physics works and he merely ignores it. It's a waste of time talking to him.

*

Offline takso

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
    • View Profile

*

Offline takso

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
    • View Profile

*

Offline takso

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
    • View Profile

*

Offline RD

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 8170
    • View Profile
[attachment=19308]

   At an atomic-scale the gravitational-force between atoms is utterly negligible compared with electrostatic-forces between them ...
   
Quote from: Professor Martin Rees
Gravity is a very, very weak force. In a hydrogen molecule it pulls the two protons together with a force about 36 powers of ten weaker  than the electric force between them.
  http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/why-gravity-is-so-weak

Your diagrams are good graphic-design , but that doesn't mean they correspond with reality.

[ BTW a person meditating may be able to have an out-of-body-experience , which is a hallucination , they are not actually levitating ].
« Last Edit: 27/11/2014 01:01:17 by RD »

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: takso
...
Welcome to the forum.

There is no need to post what everyone knows about gravity, especially when nobody asked about it.

With regards to your personal theories of physics, they are not allowed to be posted in this forum. They belong in the forum entitled New Theories.

*

Offline bingbisnar19

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 30
    • View Profile
Quoted:  ”It's called a Law of Nature, i.e. something that is observed to be true but which can't be explained”
 
Response: It can be explained. Please read until digested… science is progressive, not stagnant, thus, have an open mind. Regards. jsaldea12.2.14

*

Offline PmbPhy

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2788
    • View Profile
Quote from: bingbisnar19
Response: It can be explained. Please read until digested… science is progressive, not stagnant, thus, have an open mind. Regards. jsaldea12.2.14
How dare you spout such nonsense when you refuse to address the criticism that's been levied against you? And what's with the comment when I explained to you that I wouldn't speak to you again until you learned more about physics so that you learn what's wrong with your approach, i.e. why you're merely tossing out silly ideas with no merit rather than doing real science.  I haven't see one iota of a proof or a mathematical treatment to show that your claim is true and I've proven that that claims stated without mass are clearly false.

I've already told you, again and again as a matter of fact, not merely that you're wrong but exactly why. I already did read it until it was digested and after I read it, it was still clear to me that it's all wrong. You have this highly erroneous belief that just because you find it logical that it clearly is. There is nothing further than the truth. For each point you made there is a reason why you're wrong and I clearly explained each and every mistake to you. However you're not only so closed minded that you're unable to see your mistakes but you're being so arrogant as to talk down to the people you asked to read it. Shame on you.

I'm a highly trained physicist. I've been so for several decades. I went to graduate school and have the equivalent of a masters degree in physics (I missed a couple credits out of well over a hundred due to family illness). I know the subject matter solid, which is much more than I can say for you. And you don't even understand the principles of science which I'll now explain to you. You should read it at

What is Science Am. J. Phys. 67 (8),
http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ref/what_is_science.pdf
Quote
The following statement was originally drafted by the Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) of the American Physical Society, in an attempt to meet the perceived need for a very short statement that would differentiate science from pseudoscience.
This statement has been endorsed as a proposal to other scientific societies by the Council of the American Physical Society, and was endorsed by the Executive Board of the American Association of Physics Teachers at its meeting
in Atlanta, 20 March 1999.

Science is the systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world and organizing and condensing
that knowledge into testable laws and theories.

The success and credibility of science is anchored in the willingness of scientists to:

1) expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by other scientists; this requires the complete and open exchange of data, procedures and materials;

2) abandon or modify accepted conclusions when confronted with more complete or reliable experimental evidence.

Adherence to these principles provides a mechanism for self-correction that is the foundation of the credibility
of science.
American Association of Physics Teachers
You're not doing almost nothing to meet this. So don't you dare lecture me of something I know so well and you demonstrated that you know so little. Especially when you don't address the criticism that's been levied against you.

And then when I tell you that I won't respond to anything else you say  until you address the criticism that I've posted and proved it to be wrong you have the audacity to post such a childish challenge such as this? Who do you think you're speaking to, High School students or something? Far from it.
« Last Edit: 02/12/2014 04:29:16 by PmbPhy »

*

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 4058
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Quoted:  ”It's called a Law of Nature, i.e. something that is observed to be true but which can't be explained”
 
Response: It can be explained. Please read until digested… science is progressive, not stagnant, thus, have an open mind. Regards. jsaldea12.2.14

OK then present the mathematics that supports your point of view. My guess is you can't because you have not even studied electromagnetism. I am willing to be corrected. So there is your challenge. If you can't then your thread is not worth the waste of time in reading it. Simply saying a magnet attracts at both poles is not enough.