The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Evolution AND Theism?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Evolution AND Theism?

  • 23 Replies
  • 10820 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8971
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 882 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution AND Theism?
« Reply #20 on: 11/01/2015 10:59:18 »
Quote from: alancalverd
were there any societies that worked a 5, 8 or 10 day cycle?
In a frenzy of metrification, an attempt was made to introduce a decimal week following the French Revolution.

It had 1.5 days of rest every 10 days, which made it unpopular with workers (even though 1.5/10=15% and 1/7=14.3%). It also had problems with leap years. It only lasted 12 years before Napoleon reverted to the Gregorian calendar.

I have seen a vintage French clock marked with both decimal and duodecimal hours.

The metric weights & measures for length, mass and volume live on in Europe and in science labs around the world... and many countries now have currency divided into 100 units.
Logged
 



Offline Caleb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 62
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution AND Theism?
« Reply #21 on: 13/01/2015 05:03:37 »
Take a look at Jonathan Haidt who wrote a wonderful book, "The Righteous Mind." He talks about how religion "Blinds Us and Binds Us" and how useful religion--and similar principles are--in getting groups of us to work together.

For example, he says that a single rower  may be able to beat other rowers, but a two-seat rowing scull can beat others, and more and more rowers in a rowing boat can beat lesser numbers of  rowers.

He talks about religion as being inherited in the last 50,000 years or so (something like that, but don't hold me to that number) and increasing our tendency to group together.

This really is a terrific book. The best book I've read in several years regarding the nature of human beings. Other great books are those by Ariely, Kahneman, etc. But this one is very, very insightful.

Yours,

Caleb
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10881
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 632 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution AND Theism?
« Reply #22 on: 14/01/2015 22:20:06 »
And a thousand Christians can beat a hundred Muslims, hence crusades. And a thousand Catholics can torture a few Jews, hence the inquisition. And a million Protestants can disenfranchise  half a million Catholics, hence Northern Ireland. And so it goes on. Religion is the last refuge of perverts and scoundrels.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Caleb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 62
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolution AND Theism?
« Reply #23 on: 15/01/2015 03:46:13 »
"And a thousand Christians can beat a hundred Muslims, hence crusades. And a thousand Catholics can torture a few Jews, hence the inquisition. And a million Protestants can disenfranchise  half a million Catholics, hence Northern Ireland. And so it goes on. Religion is the last refuge of perverts and scoundrels."

Yes, about large groups winning out over smaller groups no matter how correct their ideas are. But evolution doesn't care about the long range correctness of the views, I think. Just what survives in the short term.

Another very interesting observation by Jonathan Haidt is the idea that civilization now rewards people who "appear" to be good -- e.g., honest, knowledgeable, etc. -- in public, and therefore we are as lawyers arguing why our position is the best position as compared to all the others.

Yours,

Caleb
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...

Started by MangalmurtiBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 5
Views: 4628
Last post 03/10/2018 20:03:37
by Bored chemist
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation

Started by nismo1Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 3
Views: 3769
Last post 29/09/2011 15:07:26
by nismo1
The evolution of man "Homo Sapiens" 200 thousand years into the future

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 16416
Last post 18/11/2008 18:57:49
by Alan McDougall
Can DNA evolution switches in transparent animals change electron energy levels?

Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Chemistry

Replies: 1
Views: 2383
Last post 09/07/2016 12:37:49
by puppypower
The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity

Started by paul.frBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 33
Views: 18550
Last post 20/02/2009 01:47:43
by _Stefan_
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.124 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.