You need to distinguish between "closed" and "enclosed". Read Bertrand Russell "Principia Mathematica" for a full explanation(I think it's Chapter 3 or thereabouts, dealing with bounded sets). But I don't see how it is relevant to this thread anyway, which is about an electrostatic discharge.

It is relevant because everything is connected by EMR, an EMR constant that in space has no net charge , only by interaction does a net charge establish, a net charge different to the constant.

Entropy of an object enclosed by light is dependent on light magnitude.

Zero point space, sorry i should explain better. Everything happens at point zero space.

Zero represents 0=t , time,

the point represents 0 dimensions, V=0 , xyz=0, V being volume, xyz being 3 dimensional space.

So if you place your hands 1ft apart then move your hands out of the way, then where your hands were imagine millions of zero point spaces where your hands where joined by the space of millions of zero point spaces.

Then you are on my wavelength of though and can see the complete matrix of the universe, not in a computerised sense though to be clear.

Even a 0 is to big to represent a . , and even a . is to big to represent zero point space.

after the = represents zero point space , =

Lightning starts from a zero point space.

The big bang started from a zero point space.

I and you evolved from a zero point space.

zero point space-

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=black&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=923&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=uFQRVbvgCorkaIrHgMAN&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#imgdii=_&imgrc=lX5ajMOCxxvKaM%253A%3BtZD74d6_-RBo3M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblacklabelsociety.com%252Fhome%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2014%252F01%252Fspacer.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.blacklabelsociety.com%252F%3B960%3B400

[Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register]In the link I do not see a blackness, I see matter everywhere but the matter is so far away and I can not see it, I perceive it as zero point space.

''I know of no science that makes any claims - science is a process, not an agent. Air is certainly buoyant in the presence of liquid water, but sinks in an atmosphere of hydrogen, or even gaseous water.''

A process that explains air wrongly as buoyant.

Air is not buoyant to water it simply can not pass the waters density. The same reason we are always falling but the ground stops us falling.

Air naturally always wants to fall, and always does fall, except when some force stops it falling.

Each and every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

zero point space can never occupied by two particles occupying the same zero point space, any particles recombining in zero point

**spaces **start an isotropic centripetal epoch of recombination,

This is how I see lightning, except positive charge being pressured isotropic and centripetal to the energies core, (micro scale), whilst the energy wants to repel itself and tear itself apart.

The pressure builds then is released to create a rift, (lightning), from where the space is distorted into an positive energy, and the energy is released, the zero point space, the surrounding negative force/pressure collapses forcing the observed pulse until the energy dissipates. A sort of oscillating effect expansion and contraction at the same time.

The negativeness that is collapsing gaining some of the expanding charge, then ''colliding'' at zero point space, to start a chain reaction until the energy is spent at that point and redirected by dispersion.

It could be has few as two positive ions being enclosed by negative ions, the negative ions wanting to crush the positive ions by attractive force and volume .