0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
after i understood light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms, i am sure there is no photon.
Quote from: jccc on 17/04/2015 10:16:11after i understood light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms, i am sure there is no photon....Sounds interesting. I want to know more about it, please!
Oooooo... Interesting theory! To me it sounds more feasible than photons.
Quote from: Jasper HaydenQuote from: jccc on 17/04/2015 10:16:11after i understood light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms, i am sure there is no photon....Sounds interesting. I want to know more about it, please!Please take note of the fact that you're asking a known crackpot to explain his nonsense with you.
Well turn off all the lights and you will simply float away. What a load of old rubbish. I think you need a fantasy fiction forum. It is so easy to sit in a comfy chair and let your imagination wander. That way you don't need to expend any of that tiresome effort learning anything. You might actually surprise yourself by what you would learn by actually taking criticism as positive. It is a sign of good character.
Quote from: Jasper Hayden on 17/04/2015 11:05:21Oooooo... Interesting theory! To me it sounds more feasible than photons.please tell Pete why you think my theory of light sounds more feasible to you, appreciate.
I know I have been sent to Coventry in a hope I will leave science alone.
I need to confirm this one thing before I declare who's side I'm on and defend my previous statement...to confirm my knowledge on photons I searched around different physics forums and the only answer they had was... That the photon is energy .....
Quote from: Thebox on 18/04/2015 00:38:27I know I have been sent to Coventry in a hope I will leave science alone. No one is sending you to Coventry, it's just that folks have learnt that answering a question from you results in the following:- An accusation that we just quote book learning- A statement that you are fully capable of thinking it out yourself- A nonsensical statement of misused words and phrases.Eventually people get tired of trying
So because I will not accept all science beliefs, you will not discuss science with me, how strange.
i have to give thebox credit for some stuff he posted. things not from text books. rarely find those stuff in a science forum.
i think temperature can be defined as average atom vibrating force/momentum in a system. the hot atoms on sun's surface vibrate to produce gravitational waves outward. that force causes atoms on earth to vibrate to heat up us.rob your hands, fiction force causes atoms vibrate faster, you feel heat.energy is force, force is energy. thoughts? i am thinking new ways to produce force or store force.
force and energy is same thing to me.
i don't think force is momentum at all.
If no one has already, I thought this might be interesting to look up. It is a physics lecture Richard Feynman did called: Photons: Corpuscles of Light. The Sir Douglas Robb Lectures at University of Auckland 1979. You can probably find it on youtube. I don't have the original link, it's an old file I have from when I was in college. No, I'm not that old. . I attended college starting in 2012. I love listening to his lectures, also Leonard Susskind. Just thought it may help in some way. Sometimes it's best to start over at the beginning and just re-think all of it all over again. If you come up with nothing new, no harm done but a better understanding of it will come out of it. enjoy!
The spectrum of light produced by hydrogen and deuterium is essentially identical, despite deuterium having twice the mass of hydrogen.The spectra of 59Fe and 59Co are totally different, despite having nearly identical mass.
The spectrum of light produced by hydrogen and deuterium is essentially identical, despite deuterium having twice the mass of hydrogen.
I also found this while digging around for some other research I was doing.o Gravitational waves are weakly interacting, making them extraordinarily difficult to detect; at the same time, they can travel unhindered through intervening matter of any density or composition. Electromagnetic waves (i.e. light or photons) are strongly interacting with normal matter, making them easy to detect; but they are readily absorbed or scattered by intervening matter. http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/differences.html [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register]I highlighted that one part and italicized it as well, because neutrinos do exactly the same thing. Or, they have the same properties in respect to that aspect between them anyway.
i read it, not agree. i think em force and gravitation force are the same force. if the moon suddenly becomes a proton star, only carries n amount of positive charges, let's see the force between moon and earth. set earth has m protons and m electrons.the attraction between moon proton and earth electron is n x m, the repulsion between earth proton and moon proton is also n x m. it should be no net force. but in reality, induce made the net em forces an attraction which proportional to the product of charges/masses.if the moon becomes an electron star, we get the same amount of em attraction force/gravity.
gravity wave is produced by vibrating mess/charge, how could a star or the earth vibrate at high frequency? only atoms able to vibrate at high frequency to produce detectable waves.
It works on any size that electrostatics works at. This certainly includes the macroscopic scale--for instance if you take an inflated balloon, rub it on your head and use it to pick up small things like feathers or paper slips or stick it on the wall (//www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYLyi7o8zoQ [Links inactive - To make links active and clickable, login or click here to register] The balloon gets a charge, and it is attracted to the wall, even though the wall is neutral.Now, if you put enough charge on the moon that electrostatic force on the Earth was substantial, the moon would probably start "throwing" charged dust off its surface.
well, if the moon were *all* proton, the moon would explode.but, if we imagine that it doesn't somehow, Earth's electrons would ultimately find their way to the moon until the moon and Earth had equal pull on the remaining electrons.If the moon had a major charge imbalance, and were similarly prevented from destroying itself, I would predict the electrons stay on the Earth, but that the Earth would be polarized.