0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_fisica36.htmI haven't read it all yet, but this has been pretty interesting so far, It claims that the aether theory was dismissed due to an experiment that has since been found faulty and so the aether theory is back.
I really did not feel I was being rude to you and alan.... I don't recall having ever insulted either of you.
and yet you take your precious time to insult me. That speaks a lot about you.
I would think as bright as you claim to be you would understand this.
I am just being straight forward as to how I felt about your response.
Please don't feel insulted by my disagreeing with your assessment, ...
Then in the future never claim someone is insulting you when, after your request, they criticize your work. Got it? Nuff said.
If it is not a difference in density, and the void it exists within, that is responsible for it's interactions, than what else? ?
Sorry nothing has been said thus far that convinces me that my idea is garbage or crack pot, ...
So, nobody is aware of a device for accurately detecting gravity?
DO NOT let the descriptions "crackpot" and "nonsense" put you off. These are descriptions that are applied to all "ideas" until they are proven.
Relativity was once considered a crackpot notion ...
... and it was only in the 1960's that it really became mainstream. (So I've read).
I cannot understand your idea myself tbh. It is imperative that you refer your notions to experiment and explain where your idea differs to established theoretical physics and where it touches base with "proven" physics.
Well of course, you are stating the obvious!
.. are descriptions that are applied to all "ideas" until they are proven.
However, there cannot be only correct ideas that transpire into working hypothesis.
My point to Dreamian being that to have an idea is not a crime and that to be called a crackpot and have your idea called nonsense is not unusual on these sites. I do agree that he is not defining his idea very well and therefore posted my suggestions based on my experience of trying to express my own idea. I note that you make no comment as to this aspect of my post, but there again it is a symptom of these sites that a poster will only remark in the negative and ignore any positive aspects that they "may" agree with.
I'm just saying to Dreamian not to let what seems like personal insults or personal knock backs upset him and to look beyond this aspect of these sites and take the positive and carry on learning.
Yes I am aware of the history of SR and GR and the atomic bomb. Of course in the world of scientists these theories were in the forefront, especially by 1945, however not all physicists and scientists were that enamoured in the early days of Einstiens theories.
Consequently, by about 1911, most theoretical physicists accepted special relativity.
PMB, that comment about dropping the marble in my room etc., that was not meant to be insulting? Humor?
I have read about the detectors you linked in the next paragraph, I believe they have developed one for detecting shielded weapons on the border.
I just don't think the ones I have read about will work for me though, but I will check out those links and see if I can come up with a design that will. Thanks
( I know what a void is), and that the substance I refer to, having substance,
I think it is highly possible that gravity has everything to do with the void all substance exists within, and the void that exists with no substance.
Not only Ger0, but also Ger that is less dense then itself as it is seen as being a void in comparison to itself. However, as it is easier to fill a void than to create one, the Ger can never be completely pulled into the vast amount of voids that exist in the universe due to the Ger being pulled out in every direction of space as thin as is possible without creating new Ger0 (voids), which as I said, is more difficult than filling a void;
When a body of mass is looked at as a whole, in respect to the Ger that exists in the space that surrounds that body of mass, the mass can be seen,due to the interactions that constantly create, at very high speeds, Ger0 (voids) within that mass, as a void itself, not quite in the same respect as an actual vast void in space, but enough so that it creates a kind of tug-of-war with the Ger that exist between bodies of mass and between bodies of mass and the vast voids that exist in space.To a single body of mass existing alone in space, the pull would be equal in all directions, due to the great endless voids that exist outward from the boundaries of all Ger.
When a body of mass is introduced with another, the pull becomes greater between the 2 bodies of mass than it is in all other directions due to both masses being seen as if they were a void themselves, which is due to the Ger0 created with the interactions of the Ger within the masses. Therefore they create a slightly greater tug-of-war between themselves with the unstable Ger that exists between them, and so naturally they feel impelled to be gently pulled toward one another; or the smaller would be pulled toward a much greater mass, such as a planet due to the larger's massiveness and the forces between masses that won't allow for it to move against the stability that exists within its parameter, that can cover a galaxy and beyond.